issue38 大家元宵节快乐：）（K站队2.11）

paopaofynUID: 2124302

ISSUE 38 - "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."
WORDS：483      TIME：0:45:00        DATE：2006-2-12


读书和看电视，到底哪个可以学到更多有用的东西？
disagree

1、你可以带书到你想去的任何地方，想什么时候看就可以看的，旅途中，例在火车上，飞机上
2、读书是主动的，而看电视是一个被动接受的过程。
书虽然没有像television，有图像，而正是因为这样。它可以加强一个人的想象力，你的思维可以天马行。
类比：例如记住一个公式，如果你被直接告知推导过程的话，你可能当好似记住了，但是后来可能就会忘记。但是如果你自己推倒的话，就会很难忘记。
3.书的历史悠久，面宽而电视毕竟只有短短的历史，能教给人的时有限的


I don not degree with the speaker's assertion that people can learn more by reading books than by watching television. By reading books, a person can learn far more than watching television，for its special functions which the television can never take the place of.

Firstly, you can take a book to anywhere you want without too much trouble than a television. You can take it to every corner of your room. When you want to have a coffee in your kitchen, then you cannot take your television to there from your living room. As for a book, the case will be totally different. When you are during a travel, you can take a book without too much consideration, for its small bulk and lightweight. As for a television, no matter how small and light it is, you would choose leave it in you home at the end, avoiding too much trouble it may take during your travel. So you can take a book to anywhere you want, and, hence learn at any moment you want from it.

Secondly, instead of a passive process of watching television, the reading is an active process which between the writer and the reader. Although a book cannot provide readers images of a place, an image, or an activity as vivid as a television, it can make a person give full play of his or her imagination. It is true that television can provide vivid image, which a book cannot. But just because of this, it leaves a completely open and broad space for the readers to imagine. When the television shows some place you had never seen, what watchers get is just the same image. There is just one choice for them-----they cannot make a decision. But in a book, which describes a place, you can draw a picture of that in your mind, and it changes according to the readers. Different readers have different pictures, and it can hardly the same. This is just a reading process, which a television cannot provide. Besides the information of that place, through this process, a reader can also get an active study which can strengthen his or her imagination—this is just a learning progress. In short, one can get far more during reading than just from a passive receive process from the television. Maybe you can remember a mathematics formula very quickly, when you are told the process of how to get it than through your own effort. But you can hardly forget it if you choose the later one.

Thirdly, the book can provide you a far broader range of knowledge to meet the needs of the readers, compared with the television to the watchers. The books have a much longer history than the television. You can get almost everything from the books in a library, from the past to the present, from the astrology to the geography, and from the science to the management, while the television can just provide you limited knowledge. Though ii has developed very quickly, the television is still limited in some areas. Books are well developed, compared with television. Imagine it, a normal mature adult and a still immature child, who has more knowledge? The answer is definitely the former one. The case is the same when it comes to the book and the television.

In sum, as a tool of learn I will choose books rather than televisions, for not only its convenience but also its active reading progress helps me learning which the televisions cannot offer.

I strongly believe that in the age of television, people can learn more by reading books than watching television, for its convenience to be taken and be read, having a long history, and developing a person's imagination through a active reading progress which the televisions can hardly offer.

[ 本帖最后由 paopaofyn 于 2006-2-13 10:06 编辑 ]

thumitUID: 2131186

WORDS：483      TIME：0:45:00        DATE：2006-2-12
赞，已经在限时啦，我现在还是需要60Min左右，要加油了

读书和看电视，到底哪个可以学到更多有用的东西？

disagree

1、你可以带书到你想去的任何地方，想什么时候看就可以看的，旅途中，例在火车上，飞机上
2、读书是主动的，而看电视是一个被动接受的过程。
书虽然没有像television，有图像，而正是因为这样。它可以加强一个人的想象力，你的思维可以天马行。
类比：例如记住一个公式，如果你被直接告知推导过程的话，你可能当好似记住了，但是后来可能就会忘记。但是如果你自己推倒的话，就会很难忘记。
这个比较好，比我论证的深入，要好好学习：）
3.书的历史悠久，面宽而电视毕竟只有短短的历史，能教给人的时有限的


I don not degree agree with the speaker's assertion that people can learn more 题目中是说as much as 吧by reading books than by watching television. By reading books, a person can learn far more than watching television，for its special functions which the television can never take the place of.

Firstly, you can take a book to anywhere是副词，前面应该可以不用to了anywhere you want without too much trouble than既然有than了，比较体现在哪个词上呢 a television. You can take it to every corner of your room. When you want to have a coffee in your kitchen, then you cannot take your television to there from your living room. As for a book, the case will be totally different. When you are during a travel, you can take a book without too much consideration, for its small bulk and lightweight. As for a television, no matter how small and light it is, you would choose choose改成have to或者prefer to leave it in you your home at the end, at the end可能有点多余avoiding too much trouble it may take during your travel. So you can take a book to to去掉anywhere you want, and, hence learn at any moment you want from it.

Secondly, instead of a passive process of watching television, the the其实可以不用，这个还是很泛的一个情况reading is an active process which is between the writer and the reader.同样the的问题 Although a book cannot provide readers images of a place,这个其实也是可以提供的吧，比如图册 an image, or an activity as vivid as a television,其实这个可以接在前面，中间不用用逗号的 it can make a person give full play of his or her imagination. It is true that television can provide vivid image, which a book cannot. But just because of this, it leaves a completely open and broad space for the readers to imagine. When the television shows some place you had never seen, what watchers get is just the same image. There is just one choice for them-----they cannot make a decision. But in a book, which describes a place, you can draw a picture of that in your mind, and it changes according to the readers. Different readers have different pictures, and it can be hardly the same. This is just a reading process, which a television cannot provide. Besides the information of that place, through this process, a reader can also get an active study which can strengthen his or her imagination—this is just a learning progress. In short, one can get far more during reading than just from a passive receive receive是动词 process from the television. Maybe you can remember a mathematics formula very quickly, when you are told the process of how to get it than through your own effort. But you can hardly forget it if you choose the later one.

Thirdly, the book can provide you a far broader range of knowledge to meet the needs of the readers, compared with the television to the watchers.还是the太多了 The books have a much longer history than the television. You can get almost everything from the books in a library, from the past to the present, from the astrology to the geography, and from the science to the management,太多the啦 while the television can just provide you limited knowledge. Though ii it has developed is developing 是不是好点very quickly, the television is still limited in some areas. Books are well developed, compared with television. Imagine it, a normal mature adult and a still immature child, who has more knowledge? The answer is definitely the former one.这个类比我觉得可能不太合适，其实你还不如举点例子说一下book能涉及的而television不能涉及的，这样更有说服力一些  The case is the same when it comes to the book and the television.

In sum, as a tool of learn learning I will choose books rather than televisions, 是从一个客观的角度看问题，所以说我会选择books来学习可能没有什么意义，因为他说的是一个比较普遍的情况。而且好像有前辈说过文章中少用I，you的 for not only its convenience but also its active reading progress helps me my learning which the televisions cannot offer.这段话其实主要还是重复上面两段的内容

I strongly believe that in the age of television, people can learn more by reading books than watching television, for its convenience 换成it is convenient大概更好to be taken and be read, having a long history, and developing a person's imagination through a an active reading progress which the televisions can hardly offer.

文章的结构还是很清晰的。
几点问题：
1、In sum那一段感觉可以和最后一段合起来说，没有必要另外辟出一段来
2、有的地方的拼写还是要注意的：）
3、能不用the的地方还是尽量不要用了吧
4、书的历史悠久那一段感觉论述不是很深入
5、论述的第一和第二段感觉意思有点说的过多，就是有些地方重复说了。比如第二段secondly，第二句：书比电视好；第三、四句：基本和第二句重复；后面：更详细的论述第二句。

个人意见：）

欢迎去拍我的文章啊，在第一页的第6楼

[ 本帖最后由 thumit 于 2006-2-13 11:40 编辑 ]

paopaofynUID: 2124302

谢谢你哈，很有收获，其实自己都觉得自己写得很烂，共勉:)
还有就是那个电视不具备书所具备的，例子实在想不出来,以后想出来了就填上去


I don not agree with the speaker's assertion that people can learn as much by reading books as by watching television. By reading books, a person can learn far more than watching television，for its special functions which the television can never take the place of.

Firstly, you can take a book anywhere you want without too much trouble compared with a television. You can take it to every corner of your room. When you want to have a coffee in your kitchen, then you cannot take your television to there from your living room. As for a book, the case will be totally different. When you are going to have a travel, you can take a book without too much consideration for its small bulk and light weight. While a television, no matter how small and light your television is, you would have to leave it in your home at the end, avoiding too much trouble it may take during your travel. So you can take a book anywhere you want, and, hence learn at any moment you want from it.

Secondly, instead of a passive process of watching television, reading is an active process which is between writer and reader. It is true that television can provide vivid images of a place or an activity, which a book cannot. But just because of this, it leaves a completely open and broad space for the readers to give a full play of her or his imagination. When the television shows some place you had never seen, what watchers get is just the same image. There is just one choice for them-----they cannot make a decision. But in a book, which describes a place, reader can draw a picture of that in his or her mind, and it changes according to different readers. Different readers have different pictures--it can hardly be the same. This is just a reading process, which a television cannot provide. Besides the information of that place, through this process, a reader can also get an active study, which can strengthen his or her imagination—this is just a learning progress. Leaning a mathematics formula, for instance, maybe you can remember it very quickly when you are told the process of how to get it than through your own effort. But you can hardly forget it if you choose the later one because of your leaning progress. In short, one can get far more during reading than just from a passive receiving process from the television.

Thirdly, the book can provide you a far broader range of knowledge to meet the needs of the readers, compared with the television to the watchers. Books have a much longer history than the television. You can get almost everything from the books in a library, from the past to the present, from astrology to geography, and from science to management, while the television can just provide you limited knowledge. Though it is developing very quickly, the television is still limited in some areas. Books are well developed, compared with television. Imagine it, a normal mature adult and a still immature child, who has more knowledge? The answer is definitely the former one. The case is the same when it comes to the book and the television.

In sum，I strongly believe that in the age of television, people can learn far more by reading books than watching television, for not only its convenience but also its active reading progress which helps readers learning which the televisions cannot offer

所获　
should not abuse “and”
spelling: agree, disagee,
anywhere is a adv; receive是动词
which is between
应从一个客观的角度看问题，所以说我会选择books来学习可能没有什么意义，因为他说的是一个比较普遍的情况。而且好像有前辈说过文章中少用I，you的
结构上，要深入论证