Issue56 [Chasing For 6 Score小组第二次作业] 猛拍哈

byking1985UID: 2222368

56"Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
分类：当务之急与百年大计
提纲：
1.“远水救不了近火”，政府解决当务之急能取得短期的成效，缓解当前的矛盾，巩固政权，维持社会的稳定和持续发展
2.但是，解决将来预期的问题是避免发生当务之急的根本途径；不考虑长远的问题，将会使政府疲于应付不断发生的当前问题。
3.政府精力有限，应该根据实际情况分配注意力,而不应该草率的下结论。
字数：539                               时间：07－2－3
I agree with the speaker insofar as that government should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today in order to survive in the short term. However, trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future is just as crucial and essential- if not more so- for long-term to avoid or decrease immediate problems from happening.

"The water in a river far away can never put down the near fire", the adage tells us that we should pay more attention to find the solving approach to the critical matters currently, not to extend our minds to the future. When it comes to the government, it shares the same principle. For the sake of calming down the current contradictions, keeping the development of society steadily and persistently, and reaching the short-term effectiveness, government should focus on settling the immediate problems. Take an immediate problem in China for example, the Gini Coefficient-an economic sign-of China had exceeded the international alert line of 0.4. It has increase to 0.47 nowadays, which means that the gap, money owned, between the poor and the rich is broadening. This is really an urgent matter for the government, because the poor are not borned, it must be something not right in the society. So, the poor maybe gather together to protect themselves. In this condition, government surely pays more attention on solving the poor and the rich problem and takes care of each class's benefit to "put down the near fire".

However, trying to resolve the anticipated problem of the future is the fundamental way to avoid or reduce the immediate problems. Moving the example above on, the reason why the poor and the rich problem came out dues to that the government hadn't worked effectively on the maybe future problem-the broadening gap-before the problem was getting worse enough to attract the attention of the government. In short, if government does implement certain policies, such as more reasonable personal income tax, effective transfer pay or better welfare to resolve the future problem, it would not or at a sight probability confront the poor and the rich, immediate, problem. Exactly speaking, current problems will arrive one after one, if government does not take anticipated future problems seriously. So I tend to hold the idea that government should focus more on the future problems.

Above all, I don't mean that on account of trying to resolve the anticipated problems is more essential, government has to focus more on them all the time. It has to coincide with the practice. For example, if the country is in urgency, such as the Asian Financial Crisis broke out in 1997, the Flood of China in 1998, USA Under Attack in 2001 and so on; government of Korea, Japan, Singapore, China or America should accumulate the whole of their focuses on the immediate problems of course and regardless the future ones. Because these problems have been threatening the safety of citizens, exist of government and even the stability of the country. It's no hesitation to concentrate on the present problems at these moments, tomorrow problems have to be suspended. To sum up, although future problems are a bit more important, government can not be of absolutization when distributes its limited attentions.

[ 本帖最后由 byking1985 于 2007-2-4 23:11 编辑 ]

chongxinlaiUID: 2235209

1.“远水救不了近火”，政府解决当务之急能取得短期的成效，缓解当前的矛盾，巩固政权，维持社会的稳定和持续发展
2.但是，解决将来预期的问题是避免发生当务之急的根本途径；不考虑长远的问题，将会使政府疲于应付不断发生的当前问题。
3.政府精力有限，应该根据实际情况分配注意力,而不应该草率的下结论。
字数：539                               时间：07－2－3
I agree with the speaker insofar as that government should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today in order to survive in the short term. huhu，想起了280里面的一篇short term vs long term的However, trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future is just as crucial and essential- if not more so- for long-term to avoid or decrease immediate problems from happening.嗯，更坚定了

"The water in a river far away can never put down the near fire", the adage tells us that we should pay more attention to find the solving approach to和solving感觉有点重复了 the critical matters currently这个currently修饰谁呢？, not to extend our minds to the future.正句看着不舒服，这样说怎样？the same is true for government When it comes to the government, it shares the same principle.For the sake of for就好了吧calming down the current contradictions, keeping the development of society steadily and persistently, and reaching the short-term effectiveness, government should focus on settling the immediate problems. Take an immediate problem in China for example, the Gini Coefficient-an economic sign-of China had exceeded the international alert line of 0.4. It has increase to 0.47 nowadays, which means that the gap, money owned, between the poor and the rich is broadening. This is really an urgent matter for the government, because the poor are not borned, it must be something not right in the society. So, the poor maybe gather together to protect themselves. In this condition, government surely pays more attention on solving the poor and the rich problem and takes care of 其实和pay attention 差不多了，干脆直接and连两个宾语好了each class's benefit to "put down the near fire".

However, tryingtry吧 to resolve the anticipated problem of the future is the fundamental way to avoid or reduce the immediate problems. Moving the example above on, the reason why the poor and the rich problem came out dues to that the government hadn't worked effectively on the maybe future problem-the broadening gap-before the problem was getting worse enough to attract the attention of the government. In short, if government does implement certain policies, such as more reasonable personal income tax, effective transfer pay or better welfare to resolve the future problem, it wouldwill not or at a sight probability confront the poor and the rich, immediate, problem. Exactly speaking,类似接个 current problems will arrive one after one, if government does not take anticipated future problems seriously. So I tend to hold the idea 就是支持或反对嘛，句式复杂哦that government should focus more on the future problems.

Above all, I don't mean that on account of trying to resolve the anticipated problems is more essential, government has to focus more on them all the time. It ？指代has to coincide with the practice. For example, if the country is in urgency, such as the Asian Financial Crisis broke out in 1997, the Flood of China in 1998, USA Under Attack in 2001 and so on; government of Korea, Japan, Singapore, China or America should accumulate the whole of their focuses on the immediate problems of course and regardless no regard for the future ones. Because these problems have been threatening the safety of citizens, existence of government and even the stability of the country. It's no hesitation to concentrate on the present problems at these moments, tomorrow problems have to be是主观的不是have to的吧 suspended. To sum up, although future problems are a bit more important, government can not be of absolutization when distributes its limited attentions.
有不少句子一口气读不懂，难道是偶滴RP问题？
呵呵，组长写的不错哦。GO  ON！
我的Issue 56 ,有空拍哦
http://bbs.gter.ce.cn/bbs/thread-602902-1-1.html

blue_zsqUID: 2293265

56"Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
分类：当务之急与百年大计
提纲：
1.“远水救不了近火”，政府解决当务之急能取得短期的成效，缓解当前的矛盾，巩固政权，维持社会的稳定和持续发展
2.但是，解决将来预期的问题是避免发生当务之急的根本途径；不考虑长远的问题，将会使政府疲于应付不断发生的当前问题。
3.政府精力有限，应该根据实际情况分配注意力,而不应该草率的下结论。
字数：539                               时间：07－2－3
I agree with the speaker insofar as that government should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today in order to survive in the short term. However, trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future is just as crucial and essential- if not more so- for long-term to avoid or decrease immediate problems from happening.

"The water in a river far away can never put down the near fire", the adage tells us that we should pay more attention to find out (the solving) approaches to the (critical)urgent matters currently, not to extend our minds to the future.the adage suggests that sometimes we must put our hands to very urgent issues rather than distract our attention on something that might never happen in the future, and I admit that it is a quite pratical and effective way to solve problems. When it comes to the government, it shares the same principle. For the sake of calming down好像是表示镇定地意思吧 the current contradictions, keeping the development of society steadily and persistently, and reaching the short-term effectiveness, government should focus on settling the immediate problems, especially for something really urgent. Take （an immediate problem）a recent issue in China for example, the Gini Coefficient-an economic sign-of China had exceeded the international alert line of 0.4. It has increased to 0.47 (nowadays) at present now, which means that the gap, money owned, between the poor and the rich is (broadening)broader. This is really an urgent matter for the government, because the poor are not borned, it must be something not (right)equal in the society. So, the poor maybe gather together to protect themselves. In this (condition)case, government surely should pay more attention on solving the rich-and-poor problem and take care of each class's (benefit)interests to "put down the near fire".

However, trying to resolve the anticipated problems of the future is the fundamental way to avoid or reduce the immediate problems. Moving the example above on, the reason why the poor and the rich problem came out dues to that the government hadn't worked effectively on the maybe future problem-the broadening gap-before the problem was getting worse enough to attract the attention of the government. In short, if government (does)did虚拟语气 implement certain policies, such as more reasonable personal income tax, effective transfer pay or better welfare to resolve the future problem, it would not or at a sight probability confront the poor and the rich, immediate, problem. Exactly speaking, current problems will arrive one after (one)用one by one或者one after another, if government does not take anticipated future problems seriously. So I tend to hold the idea that government should focus more on the future problems.

Above all, I don't mean that on account of trying to resolve the anticipated problems is more essential, government has to focus more on them all the time. It has to coincide with the practice. For example, if the country is in urgency, such as the Asian Financial Crisis broke out in 1997, the Flood of China in 1998, USA Under Attack in 2001 and so on; government of Korea, Japan, Singapore, China or America should accumulate the whole of their focuses on the immediate problems of course and regardless太绝对了 the future ones. Because these problems have been threatening the safety of citizens, exist of government and even the stability of the country. It's no hesitation to concentrate on the present problems at these moments, tomorrow problems have to be suspended. To sum up, although future problems are a bit more important, government can not be of absolutization when distributes its limited attentions.这整个一段都需要重新斟酌。

[ 本帖最后由 blue_zsq 于 2007-2-6 20:10 编辑 ]