6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue and demonstrates mastery of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--develops a position on the issue with insightful reasons and/or persuasive examples
--sustains a well-focused, well-organized discussion
--expresses ideas clearly and precisely
--uses language fluently, with varied sentence structure and effective vocabulary
--demonstrates superior facility with the conventions (grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor flaws
5 A 5 paper presents a well-developed analysis of the complexities of the issue and demonstrates a strong control of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--develops a position on the issue with well-chosen reasons and/or examples
--is focused and generally well organized
--expresses ideas clearly and well
--uses varied sentence structure and appropriate vocabulary
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor flaws
6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique of the argument and demonstrates mastery of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
--develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions
--effectively supports the main points of the critique
--demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor flaws
5 A 5 paper presents a well-developed critique of the argument and demonstrates good control of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them in a generally thoughtful way
--develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions
--sensibly supports the main points of the critique
--demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have occasional flaws
--demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor flaws
--sustains a well-focused, well-organized discussion
--develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions
--develops a position on the issue with insightful reasons and/or persuasive examples
--clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
--develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions
--effectively supports the main points of the critique
--develops a position on the issue with insightful reasons
--clearly identifies important features of the argument
原帖由 t5r4a1 于 2007-7-5 19:58 发表
看了一遍,不过瘾,
两遍,也不过瘾
...
终于发现了,以目前水平,不看上N遍是成不了仙地........
| 欢迎光临 寄托家园留学论坛 (https://bbs.gter.net/) | Powered by Discuz! X2 |