arguement7 [冲刺 小组] 第五次作业

MryanUID: 2281579

In this letter the editor of the Clearview(C) newspaper board recommends people should vote for Ann Green (G) in stead of Frank Braun (B). To support this recommendation the editor points out that because of the council where B worked causes the factories have doubled, air pollution levels have increased and the hospital have treated more patients with respiratory illnesses, and G will solve  these problems because he is a member of the Good Earth Coalition(GEC). However, close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little support for the recommendation.

To begin with, the editor fails to prove that the increased factories lead to the pollution. Because we do not know how many factories in C before the pollution, may be there are only one factory, so two factory may not have very strong power to influence the environment; or may be the new factories are all fit the standard that can not bring any bad effect to the C city.

Even there are 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses, the author can not recognize that the new factories’ pollution cause it. May be more and more cars that caused the pollution or may be it is spring now, and the pollen caused the respiratory illness, so without any explanation, the editor can not acclaim that the increased factories should take charge for the respiratory illness.
Even these factories caused the pollution, the editor provides no evidence that it is related with F, may be F is also attach importance to protect the environment but he is not importance in the council, however, should G is the environmentalist just because he worked for GEC？ May be during he worked in GEC, he have no attribution to the environment protection but prepared for the mayoral election. If my assumption is true, F’s lose in the election would be the largest pity for the C’s people.

In sum, the editor can not convince me that people should elect G. To bolster the recommendation the author must provide more information about the increased factories, such as the number and the equipment, the author also should prove that F do not pay attention to the quality of the environment and G have ideas to deal with the pollution.

提纲：
1 有问题
2 不知道工厂基数，可能以前就一家，两倍以后两家工厂不会对环境造成太大的影响，而且不知道这些工厂的环保措施如何
3 没有证据表明是新建的厂子造成人类呼吸疾病，可能是越来越多的汽车尾气，也可能是春天的花粉。
4 就算是新建的厂子造成污染，也没有理由是F起的左右，可能他在市政里边说话的分量并不重即便他很有环保意识，而就因为G的工作单位就判定他是环保人士吗？
5 总结

chenhaozUID: 2525010

In this letter the editor of the Clearview(C) newspaper board recommends people should vote for Ann Green (G) in stead of Frank Braun (B). To support this comment the editor points out that the council where B worked caused the factories doubled, air pollution levels increased and the hospital treated more patients with respiratory illnesses, and that G will solve these problems because he is a member of the Good Earth Coalition(GEC). However, close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little support for the recommendation.

To begin with, the editor fails to prove that the increased factories lead to the pollution. Because we do not know how many factories in C before the pollution. Maybe there were only one factory, so one more factory may not have very strong power to influence the environment. The new factories may be all fit the standard that can not bring any bad effect to the C city.

Even there are 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses, the author can not recognize that the new factories’ pollution causes it. Maybe more and more cars caused the pollution or it is spring when the pollen might cause the respiratory illness. So without any explanation, the editor can not acclaim that the increased factories should be responsible for the respiratory illness.

Even these factories caused the pollution, the editor provides no evidence that it is related with F. Maybe F is also to protect the environment but he does not have a say in the council. However, should G be a environmentalist just because he worked for GEC？ Maybe in GEC, he had no attribute to the environment protection but his preparationa for the mayoral election. If true, F’s lose in the election would be the largest pity for the C’s people.

In sum, the editor can not convince me that people should elect G. To bolster the recommendation the author must provide more information about the increased factories, such as the number and the equipment, and also should prove that F does not pay attention to the quality of the environment while G does.