Scientific American 60 Second Science听抄（有音频文件）

lintelleUID：2297267

Broadway has a new production of heir the wind(没听出来) based on the 1925 scope’s monkey trial. And the American museum of natural history has a new whole of human argens(不知道是哪个词). A short item on Monday’s New York Times editorial page about the play and exhibit finished by reminding us that chimp DNA is almost 99% identical to human DNA. The item then says, perhaps jokingly, that creationists can take hearteningly different 1% as a 1% chance that evolution did not happen. Well, joke or not people may take this seriously. After all, it is on the editorial page of the New York Times. So let’s straighten this out, in fact the approximately 1% difference in the DNA sequences of human’s and chimp’s is living documentation of the random genetic mutations that has been selected in the 60 million years or so, since we and chimps broke away from the common ancestor. That 1% difference in DNA does represent small chance that evolution did not happen. It is the record of evolution that did happen. We are all the monkeys’ uncle.

听成这样很不错了。继续加油。

[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2007-4-25 18:51 编辑 ]

lintelleUID：2297267

的确是hexanoic & octanoic
it even lays its eggs there
more researches rely on
最后一句first steps toward a new species

lintelleUID：2297267

3、4都是对滴~
1、2是他对。
鉴定完毕~;d:
欢迎你回来呵~给你加分~

lintelleUID：2297267

两个人真是虎将啊~一搭一档标准范文都给你们听出来了……
偶来给你们跑龙套，哦吼吼~:loveliness:
三个都是自己看着爽的。这次也不敢说确定了~
1. smell in
2. suckle
3. coconut
第三个真的听得没头没脑的。还好明天有课，我去帮你们问老师呵~:rolleyes:

lintelleUID：2297267

Tina也来了~:) :hug: :handshake

lintelleUID：2297267

visual digust
as according
没弄清楚是不是to appear，听着像，但语法好像有问题……
point out that the
even closer
赞woodman:)

lintelleUID：2297267

SciAm上没有文本。确定很多次了~

lintelleUID：2297267

in
associate of

Apr 30, 2007
问过老师了，三个地方依次是
1. smell in
2. honeysuckle
3. coconut

最后的单词是low-tide，给大家一种鱼腥味的意象。

May 1, 2007
to appear
SciAm是本杂志，有时候podcast里的内容会出版在下期杂志中。这个to是将来时的用法。

[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2007-5-2 17:11 编辑 ]

lintelleUID：2297267

The coming punch-drunk is not just a risk for professional boxers,there's a risk of brain damage for amateurs too, despite their use of head protection. As according to research being presented today at the American Academy of Neurology Meeting in Boston, doctors from S hospital in Sweden perform spinal tabs on boxers within ten days of a fight. They found that cerebral spinal fluid had four times level of protein called neurofilament light which is associated with nerve damage, compared with levels found in non-applets (根据谐音写的,不知道什么东西。). Some boxers who took more than 15 hits to their head in one bout had brain damage equivalent to that of minor stroke. Evenwearing headgear boxer's brain smack against the skull with each blow, stretching blood vessels and damaging cells.

Some good news, though, the levels of markers for cell damage return to normal after a three-month hyita(没有听出来，根据谐音写的)from boxing. Doctor James Kelley, an brain injury expert in the University of Colorado said that there might be the hope for some recovery for partially injured cells.


其他的等开学了去帮你问老师。
真是牛人啊~叹息~

lintelleUID：2297267

woodman如今越来越强了，呵呵~
两个都是对的，强人。也不用去找老师了:victory:

spinal tab是生物名词，脊椎上的啥？？？偶不知道中文呵。:o 自己查字典吧。

lintelleUID：2297267

If you like go(no "go") online shopping, and you love a good scam, then we found a contest for you. Scientists in the University of Rhode Island are offering a thousand dollars to the person or persons who can most wildly manipulate a set of online ratings. Many websites encourage consumers to rate the items they purchased. Shoppers then use this information to help decide what to buy.Unfortunately, such systems are easy prey for shows looking to make certain products seem more attractive. For example, an unscrupulous author could get all his family and friends to give his book 5 stars. The Rhode Island researchers have worked up an algorithm for identifying such flowage in ratings. Now they are putting their program to the test, which is where the contest comes in. To participate, go to www.etanlab.com/rating, and download the data set, then start manipulating. The individuals who introduce the largest bias will take home the prize. And will show the scientists how they can make the fraud busting program even better. It’s fun for the whole family.I give it 4 thumbs up. Oh, what the hack, 8 thumbs up.


woodman又长进了。加油~^^


[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2007-5-4 11:45 编辑 ]

lintelleUID：2297267

what the heck
和 what the hell 相同意思。

lintelleUID：2297267

真是考试比这个清晰，速度比这个慢。但是考试时的听力段子很长，而且你紧张状态下不知道听力会打几成折扣。所以有时间还是对自己挑战挑战。

lintelleUID：2297267

抓住~
楼上的也过来和我们一起听！:o :mad ;d:

lintelleUID：2297267

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/thread-661675-1-1.html