Popsywriter2
34.Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There has been much disagreement over whether entire-life employment is benifical for businesses and working staff. Personally, I would suggest that it is a bad idea and will do harm to both sides of employment eventually. (这样的开头简洁,明了,虽然没有什么闪光点,但也是好开头的一种形式。)
As we all know, the orientation of a business is to maximize its profit . To achieve this goal, a company has to improve its products and service constantly to make it stands out in the competing market . Only when employees devote their intellegence and hard work into their jobs, the company could expect an advancement in their products and services. The company should develop a good personnel system to motivate emplyees to work wholeheartly, which is to promote the hardworking staff and dismissal those lazybones. If all workers are garenteed a life-long contract and their qualifications and attitudes do make any difference in their careers, they will stop improving themselves and pay little attention to their work. This could lead the company to a bankruption and then nobody will have a job. That means both the employer and employees are harmed by this unreasonable system. So, in a long-term run, a company should adopt a way to motivate its staff, which includes promotion and deposition.
(As it is known to all, business is based on the concept of maximum profit at lowest cost. In the light of this statement, it is of first-rate importance for a company to upgrade its product quality and customer-service. Hard working assures the success of a company, especially when it comes to producing advancement and daily service. Consequently, employees need training, in order to adapt to the marketing competition. In this sense, to sign a life-long contract is by no means a wise choice. With the guarantee of a life long contract, workers could easily become lazybones since they have been free from financial troubles. Before long the situation may go to extreme extent that the enterprise may be at the risk of bankruption. 你的这个body 段落很纠结,其实这很正常,因为一开始你并不知道你该写什么,更别说怎么写了。所以很多人写下来的效果都这样,很多还没你写得好呢!!你可以试着在写的时候多加一些逻辑性词语,如 thus, hence, therefore, because, in this sense, in that sense, consequently, accordingly等等,这样,你就会觉得:我写这句话是在为上句话作结论,或者是提出一个新的看法,新的现象,心里自然不会乱了。你可以看看我重写的段落,或许你会有所启发。)
Furthemore, like a man needs fresh air, a company needs renovation. Some new thoughts will lead the company into advancement and give it advantages in market competition, which are majorly brought from new employees. If a company stops recuirting new staff, due to its entire-life policy with current employees, it would prevent itself from getting new ideas through a siganificant channel. Also, for employees, who has been working with same collegues for a long time, it is quite possible that they have influenced each other too much to spark any inspiration. Without renovation and inspiration, we can not imagine a company could go far in such a rapidly changing market nowadays.
(In addition, in my view, what renovation to a company is what water to a man. It is indispensable for a company to adopt new employees to manage financial affairs. Necessary as the traditional thoughts are, new office workers can bring new thoughts to prosper the company system, making further success of company possible. Moreover, in terms of social psychology, new employees will influence their colleagues unconsciously, which results in renovation of the entire company. Since we are living under such a changing world, renovation is critical to a certain extent. From this standpoint, not hiring employees for their whole life but bring in new employees constantly is by all means a better choice. 这是body 段的第二部分,我重写之后的感觉是比前面你所写的段落清晰许多。但比较一下潜词造句方面,我并没有你那么用心。我觉得这就是中英文写作的差异之所在:在英文里面,好的文章要高效,而不是华丽。这与中文的观点南辕北辙。而高效在于:副词的使用+ 经典短语和句型的使用+ 逻辑词的使用。但凡做到这几点,作文就不会差!)
Finally, another factor we should take into account is that entrie-life empolyment policy will put fresh candidates in disavantages. Just think about this, if a company has to garentee to hire every worker for his/her a life-long time, how huge is the decision making of hiring ? In this condition, the employer woule pick the most exprienced worker they can get. Since it is not convenient to fire people, the employer will not be willing to make any adventure with those fresh graduates. If that, it would be a pity for those brillant young people and the companys that didn’t give they a chance.
(这里的Body段你可以采取取非式,即谈谈你不支持的那方面的好处,然后有说its disadvantages outweigh its advantages, 一句话又将它否定。)
Thus, I don’t agree with the idea of entire-life hiring. What we need is a resonable pesonnel system that motivate people to work hard, to bring in renovative thoughts and to give young people a chance.
(改完这篇文章花了40分钟,好辛苦啊!我10.17 考,我猜你应该是10.28考吧?都是10月考,还算有缘啦!在此留下我的QQ:260993250,加不加随便你,有写好的作文尽量贴上来,我改!告诉你,其实改作文是个提高作文很好的方法。我有个朋友从高中英语水平一跃到托福作文28分,就是改了2个月的作文。不过,刚开始还是以积累为主,就是学习别人给你改的东西,然后你再去改别人的,自然作文就顺手了。) |