issue51 [076g--背水一战小组]duduhaha,求拍！

duduhahaUID: 2273118

======================Issue 51======================
【题目】”Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.”

提纲：
1. 承认兴趣对于个人和社会的重要性，但指出我们的教育不可能为每个人的兴趣设计。

2.指出兴趣的重要性。

3.从两个角度指出我们的教育不能为每个人设计。
    a).一般人不知道自己的真正兴趣，而且兴趣是经常变化的。
    b).社会没那么多资源来按每个人的兴趣设计教育。

4.指出我们可以通过开选修课，设计灵活的课时来尽量满足学生的兴趣。

5.总结。

The speaker would prefer a kind of education which meet the individual needs and interests of each student. I agree insofar as the interest of students should be fully developed in the school. However, education couldn't be interests-oriented and satisfy everyone's needs because of many socioeconomic limits. To concentrate much on the individual interest but ignore the society needs would probably diminish the efficiency of education.

Admittedly, interest is the best teacher and can serve as a powerful impetus for one's learning. An education system that can take into account the special interests of each student will help them to fully develop their distinct potential and talent. In such an open system, students, feeling centered and appreciated, will be more motivated to study and have confidence and determination to overcome difficulties.

On the other hand , there are two compelling argument against the speaker's assertion when it comes to the needs of individuals. Firstly, most students have no capability to realize their inherent interests or tastes  clearly. Today's young students are fashion-seekers and they're inclined to change their interests quickly and don’t consider the consequences. It's very common for them to be keen to become a media star just after  watching a hot star's performance; to become a sportsman  when they see the final competition of a soccer match or even just a shoot. Also they are likely to major in courses easier to learn or helpful for job-hunting. So education needn't to pander to  the interests which are susceptible to change.

The second point has to do with the insufficient teaching resource. In fact, students with different personal penchant would need a great deal of resource--including classroom , schoolbooks and so on. In addition, the teachers' knowledge is supposed to be lifted in order to accord with the need of the students. Or government should employ more teachers to satisfy students with distinct interests. These would  place an enormous burden on finite federal financial budget. After all , government is obliged to spend their budget on the most necessary  public utility. It is unjustifiable for educators to invest more money in the interests-oriented education when some poor students have no chance to go to  school.

Although complete liberty in designing education is not available to all individual students, schools can try their best to offer more compulsory education to
satisfy students' various interests. Also a flexible school timetable could afford the students more free time to do what they like.

In sum, a successful education should not only give much thought to the interests of the students, but also take into account the needs of the society. A neglect of each side will only result in inefficiency.

flaflagogoUID: 2280642

The speaker would prefer a kind of education which meet the individual needs and interests of each student. I agree insofar as the interest of students should be fully developed in the school. However, education couldn't be interests-oriented and satisfy everyone's needs because of many socioeconomic limits. To concentrate much on the individual interest but ignore the society needs would probably diminish the efficiency of education.

Admittedly, interest is the best teacher and can serve as a powerful impetus for one's learning. An education system that can take into account the special interests of each student will help them to fully develop their distinct potential and talent. In such an open system, students, feeling centered and appreciated, will be more motivated to study and have confidence and determination to overcome difficulties.

On the other hand, there are two compelling argument(s) against the speaker's assertion when it comes to the needs of individuals. Firstly, most students have no capability to realize their inherent interests or tastes clearly. Today's young students are fashion-seekers and they're inclined to change their interests quickly and don’t consider the consequences. It's very common for them to be keen to become a media star just after watching a hot star's performance; to become a sportsman when they see the final competition of a soccer match or even just a shoot. Also they are likely to major in courses easier to learn or helpful for job-hunting. So education needn't to pander to the interests which are susceptible to change.

The second point has to do with the insufficient teaching resource. In fact, students with different personal penchant would need a great deal of resource--including classroom, schoolbooks and so on. In addition, the teachers' knowledge is supposed to be lifted in order to accord with the need of the students. Or government should employ more teachers to satisfy students with distinct interests. These would place an enormous burden on finite federal financial budget. After all, government is obliged to spend their budget on the most necessary public utility. It is unjustifiable for educators to invest more money in the interests-oriented education when some poor students have no chance to go to school.

Although complete liberty in designing education is not available to all individual students, schools can try their best to offer more compulsory education to satisfy students' various interests. Also a flexible school timetable could afford the students more free time to do what they like.

In sum, a successful education should not only give much thought to the interests of the students, but also take into account the needs of the society. A neglect of each side will only result in inefficiency.

同样很赞！你的文章逻辑非常的好，而且看问题的角度也把握的很到位。把语言组织好了就没什么问题了：）不错不错~

tongwawawUID: 2176887

The speaker would prefer a kind of education which meets the individual needs and interests of each student. I agree insofar as the interest of students should be fully developed in the school. However, education couldn't be interests-oriented and satisfy everyone's needs because of many socioeconomic limits. To concentrate much on the individual interest but ignore the society needs would probably diminish the efficiency of education.

Admittedly, interest is the best teacher and can serve as a powerful impetus for one's learning. An education system that can take into account the special interests of each student will help them to fully develop their distinct potential and talent. In such an open system, students, feeling centered and appreciated, will (+always) be more motivated to study and have confidence and determination to overcome difficulties.

On the other hand , there are two compelling arguments against the speaker's assertion when it comes to the needs of individuals. Firstly, most students have no capability to realize their inherent interests or tastes  clearly. Today's young students are fashion-seekers and they're inclined to change their interests quickly and don’t consider the consequences. It's very common for them to be keen to become a media star just after  watching a hot star's performance; to become a sportsman  when they see the final competition of a soccer match or even just a shoot. Also they are likely to major in courses easier to learn or helpful for job-hunting. So education needn't to pander to  the interests which are susceptible to change.

The second point has to do with the insufficient teaching resource. In fact, students with different personal(总觉得有些多余) penchant would need a great deal of resources--including classrooms , schoolbooks and so on. In addition, the teachers' knowledge is supposed to be lifted in order to accord with the need of the students. Or government should employ more teachers to satisfy students with distinct interests. These would  place an enormous burden on finite federal financial budget. After all , government is obliged to spend their budget on the most necessary  public utility. It is unjustifiable for educators to invest more money in the interests-oriented education when some poor students have no chance to go to  school.

Although complete liberty in designing education(没看懂呢) is not available to all individual students, schools can try their best to offer more compulsory education to
satisfy students' various interests. Also a flexible school timetable could afford the students more free time to do what they like.

In sum, a successful education should not only give much thought to the interests of the students, but also take into account the needs of the society. A neglect of each side will only result in inefficiency.
不错啊,思路结构把握的都很好,但是个别地方表达不是很地道,但是我也说不上来怎么改
还要说一个问题啊:我不知道GRE作文有没有这样的要求, 反正在托福作文中是不允许有couldn't 这样的缩写的, 这样显得很不正规,打起来也很麻烦呢,呵呵