issue83

lestouUID: 2260126

WORDS: 515          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2007-11-26 12:25:31
1.     区分WILDNESS和USELESS环保的重要性要明确，科学，环境，生态等多重意义。
2.     不去碰它还不够，需要指定出专门的保护方案来保护。不然在当今这样的环境下还是会。。。
Many people argue that government should keep the wildness areas in their natural state from being arbitrarily destroyed by human. I strongly agree with this assertion.

First, we should discriminate between wildness and useless which are always confused lots of people. Wildness mounts to the places, such as desert, ocean, plateau, and so forth, where most people can hardly access. However these “wildness” places are far from useless. By this we mean those remote area always possess marvelous amount of natural resource with scientific, ecological, environmental meaning, which is also indispensable to the development of our society in the future. What's useless seems today may become most precious treasure in the future, and that is the golden rule for our mundane people to follow. A case in point is in Western Australia, where there is an isolated land without any living things located. People in Australia doesn't pay any attention to this wild and "useless" place, however, years later scientists found that there are many coral reefs and other precious species around the sea area of the island which can play a significant role not only in the biology study but also in oceanography study. In this point, what we should do is not only regard the earth as our own, but also our children and grand-children, as well as other animals and creatures.

On the other hand, if we just leave these remote areas alone, we also can not bear an assumed outcome in this profit driven society. Though these remote area are only accessible to a few people, but that doesn't mean it can avoid being destructed, sometimes even few people can bring disaster to this dedicate, balanced ecological circumstance. For instance, on the Tibetan plateau whose rigidity and barren keep most of people away from it, however the number of Oryx still sharply decreased due to the illegal hunting by a few groups of people. Another example in case is the protection of panda which live in natural preservation of China. Once local officials in authority advocate that government should not interfere with the activity of the mountain area, they alleged that an optimal living environment for panda can obtained automatically. What the result turns out, however, is not a boom of the panda number but a destruction of the forest and environment. Without rigid protection regulations and measures species are easily to be extinct by the killing of profit driven people, and such a scenario is expected by none of us.

What's more, to say "preserve wildness in their natural state", I would insist, can hardly carry out and probable can't achieve. Any places where exist some people living, will be influenced by peoples' behavior more or less, and can not ultimately keep in its original state. So at least drastic measures and regulations should be set up to make sure people and all kinds of species living there can co-habitant there, and hopefully on the basis of doing that both of them can enjoy a harmonious life, though paradox always exist.

In summary, we can never emphasis the protection of the wildness   too much since it will significantly benefit our human beings of myriad of aspects in the future.

兰子UID: 2404184

Many people argue that government should keep the wildness areas in their natural state from being arbitrarily destroyed by human. I strongly agree with this assertion.

First, we should discriminate between wildness and useless which are always confused (写的不对,后面要加一个to,)lots of people. Wildness mounts to the places, such as desert, ocean, plateau, and so forth, where most people can hardly access(字典上access做动词的意思是获取,用在这里不适宜). However these “wildness” places are far from useless. By this we mean those remote area always possess marvelous amount of natural resource with scientific, ecological, environmental meaning, which is also indispensable to the development of our society in the future. What's useless seems today may become most precious treasure in the future, and that is the golden rule for our mundane people to follow. A case in point is in Western Australia, where there is an isolated land without any living things located. People in Australia doesn't pay any attention to this wild and "useless" place, however, years later scientists found that there are many coral reefs and other precious species around the sea area of the island which can play a significant role not only in the biology study but also in oceanography study. In this point, what we should do is not only regard the earth as our own, but also our children and grand-children, as well as other animals and creatures.

On the other hand, if we just leave these remote areas alone, we also can not bear an assumed outcome in this profit driven society. Though these remote area are only accessible to a few people, but that doesn't mean it can avoid being destructed, sometimes even few people can bring disaster to this dedicate, balanced ecological circumstance. For instance, on the Tibetan plateau whose rigidity and barren keep most of people away from it, however the number of Oryx still sharply decreased due to the illegal hunting by a few groups of people. Another example in case is the protection of panda which live in natural preservation of China. Once local officials in authority advocate that government should not interfere with the activity of the mountain area, they alleged that an optimal living environment for panda can obtained automatically. What the result turns out, however, is not a boom of the panda number but a destruction of the forest and environment. Without rigid protection regulations and measures species are easily to be extinct by the killing of profit driven people, and such a scenario is expected by none of us.

What's more, to say "preserve wildness in their natural state", I would insist, can hardly carry out and probable can't achieve. Any places where exist some people living, will be influenced by peoples' behavior more or less, and can not ultimately keep in its original state. So at least drastic measures and regulations should be set up to make sure people and all kinds of species living there can co-habitant there, and hopefully on the basis of （用by应该好一些）doing that both of them can enjoy a harmonious life, though paradox always exist.

In summary, we can never emphasis the protection of the wildness   too much since it will significantly benefit our human beings of myriad of aspects in the future.

决的第一段不是很切题，我觉得题目的重点是在说要保护一些偏远的地区，即使这些地区很少有人去，但这并不意味着他们不会被污染，被破坏！
第2段，我觉得列举的例子很好，很有说服力，但是，我不清楚，ets的老师再改作文时，对中国的例子会很熟悉吗？我们是不是应该多举一些世界都通用的例子？

lestouUID: 2260126

区分WILDNESS和USELESS环保的重要性要明确，科学，环境，生态等多重意义
我认为是有必要介绍下的,因为感觉题目里面包含有这样的意思:GOVERNMENT的介入
既然是WILDNESS AREA, 是不是就不用管理了呢?是不是就没有价值了呢?