V6战队日用贴（停止接受新人）

zehuaUID：199246

站队最重要目标：作文互改，互相提高。
规则：每天最少写1篇。发在论坛上后将链接贴在这里，由小组其他成员进行修改。
小组成员每天上线后首先看这个贴，从中间找到没有被修改过的文章进行修改，然后在此贴中回复，贴出今日修改的文章链接，说明已经修改。
自己提交1篇，就要帮别人修改1篇。否则如果大家都等着别人的帮助，那这个小组就没有意义了。
最后提醒一句：贵在坚持！:victory::victory:

荣誉队长：
zehua
mkb57288

荣誉队员：
翦瞳
xiaowenzi118
Gladysry
dr_green
nickaaronlee
mreal
dingzj
hustzwj
fanfanzozo
kolu_ren
dinddind2003
11yvette
kobestrong
wshunsur
ttzoe
冰阳
iceoolong
wineyre

注：1。正式队员非生病等意外情况3天不参加写作和互改，希望自动申请退出。
时间所剩不多，大家努力啊！:victory:
2。强烈建议:
大家在把自己的作品链接上来前,先看看楼上是否讨论过,然后对比自己的,如果有相似的问题,就不要上了;若有,就要详细指出不同之处,这样大家互改可以更高效,不知各位意见如何?
3。人不在多在于精。大家都要努力挑战5－6分。不要混4分的人。:lol
4.新写的文章格式按issue46 V6站队 8.15 来发，不要在日用贴贴当日发文链接。用论坛搜索“V6站队”找队友文章。
时间不多了！加油！:victory:

[ Last edited by zehua on 2005-9-8 at 19:33 ]

mkb57288UID：2105771

不知道是不是该封帖了，呵呵

哥哥家有二师兄UID：2124390

还有多少人没考？加油！

mkb57288UID：2105771

最后顶一下这个帖子，算是告别了
很多记忆
而且正好是第616个帖子，也比较吉利，嘿嘿

mkb57288UID：2105771

------题目------
Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Otherwise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
------正文------
Although a society cannot develop quickly without certain experts or talents, I strongly disagree with the speaker on the assertion that children have special talents should be identified and trained to ensure they can excel in given fields. Because by doing so, we actually strive to shape a society admiring elitism at the expense of equality.

In the ever-developing ear, it seems tempting to agree with the speaker that we should cultivate talented children to help our society develop more quickly. After all, these children are so distinguished in given fields that they can accomplish the same achievement with considerable less effort than ordinary ones. In this case, it will be definitely redeemable loss that leaving such talents unexploited. However, I cast doubt on the speaker's assertion that training them at an early age will bring about a better world, by which I mean more equal, more balanced and more harmonious.

One threshold problem with the assertion is that we cannot choose fair criteria to determine which talents and abilities are more worthy cultivating. For better or not, in the society lionizing pragmatism, it is highly possible that talents associated with economic success get preferred. For instance, a children talented in mathematics or physics is usually be given extraordinary attention and training, because his talents are likely to bring about certain direct breakthrough in information technology that can create a mint of money as a result. On the other hand, children talented in folklore study tends to flag into oblivion, for their success seems to be obsolete and can hardly result in any economic success. In fact, by streaming children to two groups separately labeled talented and ordinary, we seem to be encouraging certain elitism. In my observation, the stream can not justify itself by allocating educational resources unequally even at the very beginning of one's life. However, all the children are equal citizens in the future; therefore they should not be excluded from some privileges intended to a handful of people, which will deprive them of the opportunity for self-development.

Furthermore, it seems presumptuous for the speaker to assert that the well-trained children can eventually excel in their areas and benefit our society as a result. In my observation, such training designed for so-called talented is usually featured by intensive inculcation of knowledge, which, too often, take up so much time that prevent the children from enjoying their childhood. Due to such psychological defect, these children are likely to take study as a boring and unfruitful process that brings about little happiness. After all, individuals, who are absent of interest, can hardly work effectively in given fields. Moreover, it is also possible that our educators underscore intellect and so-called talent nurture at the expense of skill in socialization, a valuable characteristic demanded by modern society. Without proper communication and coordination with others, any individual, no matter how talented he is, can never contribute significantly to our society.

In the concern whether the ethic maturity can keep pace with that of intellect, lies another reason why I take exception to the speaker's claim. If the well-trained children can only excel in given technical field while show little maturity in ethics, our society is likely to suffer from the effort of nurturing such talents. Consider the increasingly rampant criminals over Internet. Many of those attribute to some teenagers, who excel at information technology but lack certain maturity or wisdom to discern right from wrong. In this case, nurturing such talents before ethic mature accomplishes little to the well-being of our society and even serves as a backfire.

In final analysis, before fully accepting the author's assertion, we are obliged to make sure that the children are ethically qualified for the training. Moreover, we should also avoid elitism to prevent our society devolving into an unequal one.

mkb57288UID：2105771

对啊，到处贴一下，怕人看不到
在把下午的一篇Issue贴上来

wineyreUID：2106739

这一篇和综合版的那篇一样......

mkb57288UID：2105771

------题目------
The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
'Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment.'
------正文------
Before accepting the prescribed antibiotic for all patients suffering from muscle strain, it is necessary to examine the reliability carefully. In my observation, the well-organized by poorly-reasoned argument suffers from several logic fallacies: first, the study, upon which author's conclusion established, is absent of details, then probably dubious; secondly,  many other factors influencing the healing of muscle strain are overlooked; finally, the author seems to generalize imprudently. Now, I will analyze these one by one.

To begin with, to be reliable evidence, mentioned study must be strictly controlled. In other words, the anticipating patients must be identical in all related aspects. The author, however, fails to do so. It is highly possible that people in the first group are much stronger than those in the second group, and their healthy physique helps to reduce the time for convalescence. It is equally possible that patients in the first group are much younger than their counterparts in the control group, which may also accelerate the process of healing. The author even fails to consider influence imposed on the study result by different sexes, for it is highly possible that male can enjoy a quicker healing than female. Furthermore no evidence is provided about the number of samples in each group. If the number is too small, then the conclusion's representativeness of the overall pool will surely be weakened. As a result, the author cannot claim it is suitable for every patient with muscle strain to take antibiotics.

Another problem with the argument is that the author overlooks other factors that may influence the result of study. Even from the description of author's, we can notice one conspicuously different factor--that is different physicians. It is might the case that doctor specializing in sports medicine helps in reducing the time spent on convalescence, for he or she is much more capable than the general physician in treating muscle strain, which is a manifestation of sport injury. Or perhaps, patients in the first group receive more intensive care from nurses or some extra treatment, say kneading on the strained muscle. In short, before ruling out other possible factors that influence the time spent on healing, the author fails to convince me it is antibiotic rather than other factors that accelerate the process of convalescence.

Last but not least, even if secondary infections keep some patients from healing quick after 'severe' muscle strain, what about the patients with ordinary or minor muscle strain? No evidence shows that there is a good chance for these patients to get secondary infection. Therefore, antibiotics may be not necessary at all. Moreover, as we know, antibiotics is often of some side-effect, and not suitable for every. That is to say, following the generalization of the author, we actually take potential risk of undermining the health of patients.

To sum up, the mentioned fallacies severely weaken the reliability of the argument. To better support his or her conclusion, the author must substantiate that the study is strictly controlled and all factors that may influence the result are precluded. Meanwhile, to get a sounder conclusion, the author also tries hard to avoid any imprudent generalization as he does at the end of the argument.

wineyreUID：2106739

你的这个问题估计ETS也答不上来~~晕的~~
所谓的random其实也有很多种的,不过应该不是independent random,可能是pseudo random什么的~~

mkb57288UID：2105771

不知道大家认为argument有没有一些高频的参考价值
看了更新到2/9机井，发现零频还是有70道
现在在主攻总频率在5以上的题目--116道
以前看过一遍全部的题库，不知道现在要是不看剩下的一半题目会不会风险很大

mkb57288UID：2105771

附件打不开，能压缩一下再发么

wineyreUID：2106739

剩下的几位队员一定要加油~~
虽然可能ttzoe看不到,可是还是要说,其实走过了,回头去看没有那么难的,无论什么时候都不要轻言放弃~~

wineyreUID：2106739

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=330765
我最后两天用的资料~~大家有兴趣可以看看~~

wineyreUID：2106739

最后几天因为不能上网,所以一直在看以前下的太傻的东西,有一部分的一休题纲很是不错,对开拓思路很有帮助的~~
呵呵,我晚点发上来~~

wineyreUID：2106739

不好意思,考完了~~
机经:I150,A71
还有一题I很眼熟的~~不记得是什么了~~