- 最后登录
- 2007-12-25
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 415
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-11-12
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 384
- UID
- 2157010
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 415
- 注册时间
- 2005-11-12
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
When television gradually becomes an indispensable part of our life, can we simply assert that the function of books will be replaced by the television? I tend to hold a negative view. Although televised program benefits us a lot, when it comes to learning, it cannot simply be the substitution of books.Admittedly, as a means of imparting knowledge, television has its priority when it comes to certain respects of learning.Its innate feature enables it conveying more vivid information while illustrating, which makes the learning of respects such as art, geography far more efficient than the traditional means. For example, no matter how skillful a journalist is, it may be beyond his ability to give his readers a exact impression on a painting; however, a child who've managed using video camera can easily display the same painting on TV set-even with little difficulty. What's more, since the world is becoming a more eventful place; it could be an onerous job for us to record all the news in the written form. Undoubtedly, in these respects, televised program does provided(provide) us an energy-saving alternative and facilitates the progress of learning. However, the books are far- more good than television when it comes to learning. There're mainly three reasons that makes me state so. Firstly, considering the inherent nature of the two kinds, televised program has its inefficiency. As a means of learning and entertainment, the passive nature of television has raised a series of problems, among which the most serious one is the so-called TV addiction. Just like drugs and alcohol can give people great 'relief', by sitting before the television and turning on the switch, one has to do nothing but enjoy the mental relax, during which time all the worries and anxieties about the reality have been diluted. Such a process can severely resist a person from any endeavors. If televised program have majored our means of learning, then we are justifiable to worry that, to what extent will its disadvantages affect us? On the contrary, a book can never be involved in such worries. More likely, it serves as an active job when it comes to learning, which effective thinking is highly required. Even in the course of reading a novel, one has to keep his mind active to imagine the scene described by the author, not to mention reading some abstruse works by great scientist(scientists). If we compare the function of television to riding in a car, which you needn't to do anything but expecting the destination, learning from books is more likely riding a bicycle-you can choose the path to get to the destination; you can control the speed; what's more, your body will be benefited from such a course.(这一段写得好精彩咧,特别是最后的两个比喻) Secondly, from the historic view, the books cannot be easily substituted by television programmes. In ancient times, it is through books that the merits of our ancestor passed down from generation to generation(another). The mainstream of the cultural heritage that containing ancestors' wisdom are in the written form(forms). For instance, in China, the Analects of the Confucius. is carried down in the written form. The uniqueness lying in such a process decides the mainstream of learning materials should be books. Any attempt to adapt such written form into another kinds of media, televised program for example, will undoubtedly ruin some original information carried in the books. Thus the historic function of books keeps written form the mainstream of learning.(这一段的意思我没看的太明白,我底子差,抱歉哈,呵呵)Furthermore, if we pay more attention to the structures of our pyramids of knowledge, you'll find the decisive and the fundamental parts-our scientific knowledge, or our documents are all in written forms. For instance, in scientific area, thousand of papers and thesis are in written form; in the area of laws, the regulations and the code of each country are preserved in form of books. The information from all these domains constructs a huge data base. Even if we ignore the difficulties that translate all these written forms into televised programs; can you imagine how onerous and consuming the job is to get all these information in televised programs? Unless this task is completed, television can never take the place of study when it comes to study.(这一段的事实例证方法也很好。) In sum, whether from the nature of the two kinds, the perspective of history, or the constitution of the building of knowledge, books are functioning as the mainstream when it comes to learning, which can hardly be replaced by television.
1、 写得好好!我好羡慕的
2、 在例证方面和语言组织方面毫无问题,例子用的很好,特别是比喻
3、 唯一就是Secondly这一段我没看太明白,不过字数也够多了,删去这一段也行
写的很好的,加油! |
|