: _! l, P, |' A( @# W( Z: DThe reading passage raises the issue about the function of Chaco Canyon, which is a settlement in the twelfth century A.D.' ^% f1 Q. J$ d. X W5 X
And it gives three possibilities. However, the statement is strongly weakened by the lecture which provides drastically different ideas and argues that all these theories should not be true.
1 x& M- `; [- t" i( Z1 T0 z6 B! `% e) A3 V2 J
The professor begins by point out that although it looks like the apartment building outside, its inside disprove this theory. Actually, there is not enough fireplaces and insufficient rooms for over one hundred people inside the Chaco Canyon. This declaration disagrees with the standpoint that the Chaco was used for resident, as demonstrated in the reading passage.( W$ t+ S8 r" Z3 V6 R4 ~' c3 W% h
0 D+ b I. \/ Y3 i/ a: UThen the professor goes on to maintain that the Chaco could not be used for food supplies since there were no more big containers and spilled maize 3 o0 u( Z9 {4 ton the floor. According to the reading passage, contrarily (contrary就是副词), the houses were used for supplying food. Therefore, the lecture goes against what is presented in the reading.
# Q: b) t' [: y" M' e% Q: K" s U/ l2 j6 D' j. \' d3 F
Finally, the professor states that there should be more evidence to declare that the Chaco houses acted as ceremonial centers. The excavation of the mound might just be the trash heap like contain constructional material and the broken pot should be something that were not used up by the construct workers. This point of view also casts doubt on the reading passage, which considers the houses were used for holding ceremonies., S/ l0 @0 N* R1
写得不错,听力里的东西基本都全了。紫色是我学习的好词,然后我不知道是不是需要在前面写reading里的内容,请指教~ |