- 最后登录
- 2014-4-9
- 在线时间
- 260 小时
- 寄托币
- 1237
- 声望
- 10
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-26
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 11
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1078
- UID
- 2805124
- 声望
- 10
- 寄托币
- 1237
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 11
|
TOPIC: ARGUMENT217 - The following appeared in a brochure promoting the purchase of local franchises for a national chain of gyms.
"Now is the time to invest in a Power-Lift Gym franchise so that you can profit from opening one of our gyms in your town. Consider the current trends: Power-Lift Gyms are already popular among customers in 500 locations, and national surveys indicate increasing concern with weight loss and physical fitness. Furthermore, last year's sales of books and magazines on personal health totaled more than $50 million, and purchases of home exercise equipment almost doubled. Investing now in a Power-Lift Gym franchise will guarantee a quick profit."
WORDS: 480 TIME: 00:45:00 DATE: 2000-7-24 16:59:57
The argument is well present, but not thoroughly reasoned. By citing the popularity of Power-Life Gyms (PLG) and the nationwide increasing concern with physical fitness and personal health, the arguer's suggestion that to invest in PLG franchise is profitable seems logical.
Firstly, the arguer's assumption that those existing PLGs in 500 locations are successful is open to doubt. Although PLG already have customers in 500 locations, in the absence of a concrete finical report, it is impossible to conclude that to invest in PLG franchise is worthwhile. Admittedly, according to the national surveys, people are more and more enthusiastic about weight loss and physical fitness, all of which might explain why PLGs' popularity because businessmen want to grasp this feat by investing in gyms. However, the arguer fails to give a clear market orientation to PLG. Perhaps PLG is aimed at making people more stout instead of slim that is favored by the market. Or perhaps PLG is preferred by athletics rather than common people because its most conspicuous feature is to provide professional guidance of sports. Without giving us a clear market orientation of PLG and a financial analysis about those existing PLGs, the arguer cannot justifiably assume that the exiting PLGs are successful and profitable.
Secondly, last year's skyrocketing sales of publication on personal health and home exercise equipment do not indicate that consumers will also have strong interest in Gym. The cost of attending a Gym is much expensive than buying a book about healthy lives or purchasing a home exercise equipment. In fact, publications on personal health and home exercise equipment are very likely to threat PLG's share of the market.
Finally, the arguer commits a over-generalization. Even we accepted that those existing PLG are profitable and people also have strong desire for Gym, it is presumptuous to suggest that to invest now in local PLG franchise is a wise choice. People's consuming habit may vary considerably from town to town since consuming habit can be determined by many factors, such as the economic environment of a town, the employment rate of a town, and average salary of a town's residents and so forth. The national surveys are not representative of the local people. Perhaps local people prefer home exercise over Gym for convenience. Or perhaps they like to buy publications about healthy lives for economic concern. Besides, without making a analysis over the local potential competitors, it is irresponsible to conclude that to invest in local PLG franchise guarantee profit, not to mention a quick profit as the arguer’s claim.
To sum up, the argument is not as persuasive as it stands. To make it more logically acceptable, the arguer should provide us a comprehensive analysis over the financial condition and market orientation of those PLGs in 500 locations. Moreover, the brochure maybe more engaging if the arguer renders us a local survey and concrete statistics of the amount of money people spent on gyms last year. |
|