寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托语言类备考版 › TOEFL考试(IBT)讨论版 › 楊光的作文貼

返回列表

查看: 1948|回复: 13

[活动] 楊光的作文貼 [复制链接]

zjlkg2005
UID：2825578

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 2
寄托币: 225
注册时间: 2010-6-2
精华: 0
帖子: 3

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2010-8-31 22:45:08 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

8月31日

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Younger school children (ages five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math, science, history and language.

Art, Music, Math, Science, History and Language——all of these subjects are so crucial knowledge about human experience that I strongly advice every child between five and ten age should know at least the most basic principle about them. But teachers and parents should teach children at the promise that requiring these knowledge is not just for exam or competition with others but for beauty and life. So the point is to discriminate between the two situations first——for competition or for life?

Knowledge has the potential power to fulfill our life, but nowadays knowledge almost has become a license to compete or to earn money. One of my relative has a 9 aged child. At 6 years old, her parents sent her to learn violin, because they thought a girl should have some artistry so that she can show herself in social intercourse when she grow up. But the girl had a lot of school assignments everyday, and she had to learn mathematics at every weekend, so there was not enough time to learn violin. Besides, the girl had showed little interest about it. Their parents gave up this plan, but one year later they let their girl to take a calligraphy course, just because it will help their child to have a beautiful handwriting in the examination. You can imagine the result—the girl cried and refused to take the course because it was so boring and the teacher was a irascible old man always carrying a bundle of twigs to punish students…

In the case of my relative, the best result to the girl is that her will learn nothing, and the worst result is, which is terrible, she will lost the interest to knowledge. So the essential thing that parents should do first is to show the beauty of the knowledge to their child and to cultivate his/her curiosity, imagination, and creativity. You will never know what talent your child have if you are not sensitive enough to explore it. Maybe he/she will become a genius painter or he/she is so talented that can master Greek or Latin at small age. But if you just teach your child for utilitarian purpose, all these talent will be in vain.

有學文學的嗎歡迎認識！

回应
0

使用道具举报

185726666
UID：2686686

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 175
注册时间: 2009-8-21
精华: 0
帖子: 5

沙发

发表于 2010-9-2 18:06:08 |只看该作者

1# zjlkg2005 记住
托福的格式有些体系
就像八股
最好5段
首尾各占一段
中间三段是三个支撑你文章的论点
通俗点说
就是原因啊
而你通篇实际明显的就只有1个原因呢
是不够的哈

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

Don't worry Be happy

使用道具举报

zjlkg2005
UID：2825578

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 2
寄托币: 225
注册时间: 2010-6-2
精华: 0
帖子: 3

板凳

发表于 2010-9-2 23:26:14 |只看该作者

9.2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students should not take part-time jobs while they are studying in universities.

I don't think students should take part-time jobs if their parents can afford school fees, although nowadays the advocacy that every student should have contact with society earlier is so popular.

First, there are a lot of students who go out to take part-time jobs not because they need money to pay the school fees but just want to earn more money to satisfy their extravagance. I have some friends who always take some part time jobs. They told me sometimes they earned money just for experiencing the feeling of becoming rich. It's ridiculous, because when they put their focus on money, they will forget their purpose and responsibility as a student. Of course if a student really can not afford the fees to study and live, he can take a part-time, but I rather advice him to grant a loan.

Second, the time studying in university is short and precious in one's life. One should use this period to develop their interests to knowledge, improve their intellectual and try to find what is his potential talent so that he can explore and accumulate his energy for his future career. So I do not think one would have spare time to earn money. After all, students will spent most of their lifetime to earn money after they graduate, so they needn't be so hurry.

There is also another advocacy that students should take part-time jobs, because they can't contact society in university, and that means they can not develop the capacity to adapt to the competitive world. I strongly oppose this view. Maybe students who spent most of their time in university can not develop their ability to adapt the competitive world, but they will improve their other capacity which is more important, like wisdom, foresight and ability to learn and think matters deeply and wildly. Maybe they can't adapt to social environment quickly after they graduate, but it dose not matter, because they have acquire the ability to study.

The popular hypothesis that students can not have a good expectation if they have not contact society earlier in university indicates utilitarianism is so welcome. I don't think that is a good phenomenon. After all, university is to cultivate student's intellectual rather than to teach them to earn money.

有學文學的嗎歡迎認識！

使用道具举报

185726666
UID：2686686

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 175
注册时间: 2009-8-21
精华: 0
帖子: 5

地板

发表于 2010-9-3 10:03:46 |只看该作者

真的哦要5段的 I'M SERIOUS

Don't worry Be happy

使用道具举报

小囧字
UID：2752429

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 151
注册时间: 2010-1-21
精华: 0
帖子: 3

5楼

发表于 2010-9-4 20:29:02 |只看该作者

3# zjlkg2005
根本很完美啊~！！没有什么要改的啊~！！！楼主太厉害了~！
帮我也改下吧~

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

蜀道难，难于上青天。

使用道具举报

lizhengjiang
UID：2619543

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 1
寄托币: 476
注册时间: 2009-3-22
精华: 0
帖子: 16

6楼

发表于 2010-9-4 20:37:01 |只看该作者

实在不好意思现在才看。。
在外面用电脑，也不让我粘贴，就这样了。。呵呵
Art, Music, Math, Science, History and Language——all of these subjects are so crucial knowledge about human experience that I strongly advice every child between five and ten age should know at least the most basic principle about them. But teachers and parents should teach children at the promise that requiring these knowledge is not just for exam or competition with others but for beauty and life. So the point is to discriminate between the two situations first——for competition or for life? （只是这个开头中有些词，crucial knowledge,, human experience, basic principle, beauty and life用的很空，就是感觉）
. f7 ?8 l6 {9 K/ r( g( ]7 e7 Z- J. v0 Y- `

) E2 M' m7 I2 Knowledge has the potential power to fulfill our life, but nowadays knowledge almost has become a license to compete or to earn money. One of my relative（s） has a 9 aged child. At 6 years old, her parents sent her to learn violin, because they thought a girl should have some artistry so that she can show herself in social intercourse when she grow up. But the girl had a lot of school assignments everyday, and she had to learn mathematics at every weekend, so there was not enough time to learn violin. Besides, the girl had showed little interest about it. Their parents gave up this plan, but one year later they let their girl to take a calligraphy course, just because it will help their child to have a beautiful handwriting in the examination. You can imagine the result—the girl cried and refused to take the course because it was so boring and the teacher was an irascible old man always carrying a bundle of twigs to punish students…!X% o& b- W3 k. f
这个举例是用来证明观点吗？至少看一遍的感觉没有。。这样，如果是阅卷老师的话，就比较壮烈了。表达也有点不简练
% h: Y/ t' l: L: J0 e# V
, j/ A ?2 F6 Y2 M9 h6 X3 x d4 T& J5 G4 T/ l* {& D& ?+ s- K0 eIn the case of my relative, the best result to the girl is that her will learn nothing, and the worst result is, which is terrible, she will lost the interest to knowledge. So the essential thing that parents should do first is to show the beauty of the knowledge to their child and to cultivate his/her curiosity, imagination, and creativity. You will never know what talent your child has if you are not sensitive enough to explore it. Maybe he/she will become a genius painter or he/she is so talented that can master Greek or Latin at small age. But if you just teach your child for utilitarian purpose, all these talent will be in vain.

没有结论？？

整篇的感觉就是没有和topic 的直接关系，反倒感觉是在谈论家长教育失误？
加油吧
1# zjlkg2005

使用道具举报

liuxzz
UID：2611311

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 337
注册时间: 2009-3-5
精华: 0
帖子: 7

7楼

发表于 2010-9-4 23:25:16 |只看该作者

3# zjlkg2005

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

but sometimes there appears so deep a craving

使用道具举报

zjlkg2005
UID：2825578

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 2
寄托币: 225
注册时间: 2010-6-2
精华: 0
帖子: 3

8楼

发表于 2010-9-4 23:40:08 |只看该作者

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life。

It's a crucial capacity to express yourself appropriately and efficiently nowadays, but what I care about first and foremost is what strengths and accomplishments do you really have rather than how do you express them. To
comprehend this idea fully, we should find out what is your purpose of life. So the matter is what dose "getting successful in life" mean?

To a employee, working hard and having the skill to get along properly with your employer mean you likely gain appreciation from your employer so that you will get a chance to rise you salary or have a better position in your company, and that is your advantage unarguably. But in some occasions the result is not so ideal. For instance, sometimes although one has not considerable accomplishments as other distinguished employees have, but if he is so skillful at fawning on his superior witch is called "adulation", maybe he will get a better position than others. It is immoral and disagreeable.

Come back to the question-what is "getting successful in life" at all? Does it mean having a better salary, or having a better position either in company or in society, or satisfying one's desire even immorally? Maybe different people have the different definition. Andre Gide, a great French writer, said:"people stride for success, but I for eternity." So what matters is if one is so much talented or controversial that almost no one can understand even the "influential people", whether he should make sure other people know about his strengths and accomplishments? So many people vilified Gide when he was alive, but he never care about adulating some "influential people". Finally he gained the Nobel Prize for literature.

So, if you cannot make sure influential people or your employers know about your talent or your accomplishments, it does not mean you will fail in your life. All the matter depends on what accomplishments you take and what purpose you have.

這篇寫得比較認真。。。

有學文學的嗎歡迎認識！

使用道具举报

lynn27
UID：2774627

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 17
寄托币: 1096
注册时间: 2010-3-5
精华: 0
帖子: 34

9楼

发表于 2010-9-5 23:59:52 |只看该作者

发word哈，不然等下字体效果看不见。

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1186734-1-1.html

使用道具举报

yangduotong
UID：2793236

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 135
注册时间: 2010-4-5
精华: 0
帖子: 0

10楼

发表于 2010-9-6 14:54:54 |只看该作者

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life。& ?$ Z' i) q( s6 h, c
1 d$ K, S/ q' }( s

1 R: s) _8 T" y U H" rIt's (不能用简写) a crucial capacity to express yourself appropriately and efficiently nowadays, but what I care about first and foremost is what strengths and accomplishments do（去掉） you really have rather than how do you express them. To ' p3 ^- v" h4 i9 R6 N' Mcomprehend this idea fully, we should find out what is your purpose of life. So the matter is what dose "getting successful in life" mean?. n, X L- ^# E7 w
6 u5 C0 k) O6 f$ f9 ]
To a（Concerning the employee） employee, working hard and having the skill to get along properly with your (不能用第二人称必须用第三人称叙述) employer mean you likely gain appreciation from your employer so that you will get a chance to rise you salary or have a better position in your company, and that is your advantage unarguably（删掉）. But in some occasions the result is not so ideal. For instance, sometimes although one has not considerable accomplishments as other distinguished employees have, but if he is so skillful at fawning on his superior witch is called "adulation"（语法有问题）, maybe he will get a better position than others. It is immoral and disagreeable. 7 A. s! Y! j# z& u- O5 i! K
% Z" ?' N1 _4 E/ l% m) x; x6 e
Come back（最好写take account at） to the question-what is "getting successful in life" at all? Does it mean having a better salary, or having a better position either in company or in society, or satisfying one's desire even immorally? Maybe different people have the different definition. Andre Gide, a great French writer, said:"people stride for success, but I for eternity." So what matters is if one is so much talented or controversial that almost no one can understand even the "influential people", whether he should make sure other people know about his strengths and accomplishments? So many people vilified Gide when he was alive, but he never care about adulating some "influential people". Finally he gained the Nobel Prize for literature.
4 n" }1 U9 m+ D# {0 Y* ]% W1 Q8 h* g4 \: X
So, if you cannot make sure influential people or your employers know about your talent or your accomplishments, it does not mean you will fail in your life. All the matter depends on what accomplishments you take and what purpose you have.

使用道具举报

zjlkg2005
UID：2825578

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 2
寄托币: 225
注册时间: 2010-6-2
精华: 0
帖子: 3

11楼

发表于 2010-9-8 13:03:20 |只看该作者

2009.8.7
parents help determined the future of their children or children
allow to make their own choices.

Although nowadays our culture emphasizes individuality and personality more and more, I do not think most of young adult have developed their ability to choose their future efficiently and correctly. At least, a hippy in 1960s' America had more independence than today's young adult. Though we have higher material civilization to insure our comfortable life, we have lost our nature of adventure and the capacity to mature our spirit life. However it does not means we should depend on our parents to determ
ine our future, in contrast, the first and foremost thing we should do is to develop our own independence.

In our time, most young adult have lost ideal. If parents have high positions in society, depending them can give children chances to get good jobs easily. But if all the purpose of life is just to have higher salary or have a car or big house, this world will become dull, boring and terrible. So as a young adult, in my opinion, the most important thing is not to earn money quickly but to experience his life efficiently. Maybe parents can give their children jobs, but they can never give them the ability of independence.

Moreover, parents may be familiar with the habits of their children in life, but they always be puzzled by their children's value and fashion, that is to say, maybe parents cannot find the job which is suitable to their children. In some extreme cases, for example, some artist like Van Gogh, poet Baudelaire, even Einstein, if their future had been determined by their parents, they would never have their accomplishments, because their parents, like other people in their time, could not understand fully what talent their children had.

Of course, choosing our future independently does not mean we should neglect our parents' advise indifferently. On the contrary, not only we should take our parents' experience, but also absorb other persons' advices as possible as we can. But there is a paradox. I have a friend who depends on her parents closely so that if other's opinion is opposed to her parents' she always stands at the side of her parents blindly. All in all, we should accept people's advices and experience deliberately if they are helpful to our future no matter whether they are our relatives.

In conclusion, if you want to have a great expectation in your life, independence is more important capacity rather than the help from your parents.

有學文學的嗎歡迎認識！

使用道具举报