寄托天下
查看: 681|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] ISSUE83 [挑战极限] [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1567
注册时间
2006-7-21
精华
0
帖子
11
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-7-27 21:07:27 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ISSUE83 - "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
WORDS: 412          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2007-7-27

Although the footsteps of humans have already extended to the moon and under the ocean, there always are some areas among the cities and villages where are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people. Dose government have the responsibility to preserve these publicly owned wilderness areas? In most cases, government has the obligation.

Admittedly, in developing countries, many people are suffering hunger and diseases. Deforesting the wilderness areas or hunting the feral animals probably will accelerate the local economic dramatically. In addition, in order to preserve the wilderness areas, government has to take the burden of salaries of the keepers. On balance, if the financial situation is severe of the government, or if the wilderness area is not deserved to preserve, the government could consider to give up the burden to protect the wilderness areas.

However, if the finance permits, protecting the wilderness areas in their natural state will bring many advantages. Take the Yellow River for example. Thousands of years ago, the Yellow River was not yellow. It was as clear as other rivers because the area along the river were full of trees. Nevertheless, In Qing dynasty, in order to build palaces, the emperor ordered to cut down all the trees beside the middle session of the river. From then on, the earth was exposed to the wind and eroded by the river. The proportion of sand and earth of the river increased dramatically, and now it turns out to be "Yellow River". Thus, although it seems that the areas accessible to only a few people are remote to us, the effects brought by the degradation of the environment there are tightly relevant to us.

Furthermore, some areas with little population possess the rare species of the world or other irreplaceable significance.  Amazon tropic forest, for example, is one of the rare complex ecosystem on which many nearly extinct species depend. Besides, it provides large proportions of oxygen to the atmosphere everyday - so-called "the lung of the earth". Destroying the forests means a disaster for all human beings. Another example is the Himalayas Mountain, which is the highest mountain of the world. Although the environment is severe there and nearly no one could live there, the area is significant to human and deserved to be protected.

In sum, although sometimes when the financial situation is severe of the government, the government could consider to give up the burden, in most cases, government has the obligation to preserve these publicly owned wilderness areas.
0 0

举报

RE: ISSUE83 [挑战极限] [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE83 [挑战极限]
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-710756-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
进群抱团
26fall申请群
微信扫码
小程序
寄托留学租房小程序
微信扫码
寄托Offer榜
微信扫码
公众号
寄托天下
微信扫码
服务号
寄托天下服务号
微信扫码
申请遇疑问可联系
寄托院校君
发帖
提问
报Offer
写总结
写面经
发起
投票
回顶部