寄托天下
查看: 2127|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] issue143 [0710G 戴三个表冲刺小组] 第6次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
893
注册时间
2007-4-15
精华
0
帖子
5
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-7-31 11:51:31 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
143 提纲:
     1.观点反对。说法有些Extrem。
     2.Admittedly, 艺术家的思想是一般unique to average people inlude critics,艺术是创造性的工作,需要灵感
       如果一个艺术家只是一味的迎合大众的需要,评论家的批评,他就会丧失灵感,创造性,成为一个普通的
       的创造者,象一个普通的工人一样,做重复的劳动,没有新意,就不会有好作品
     3.However,艺术的作用是服务于大众。如果不能很好,反映生活。如果一个艺术作品只是艺术家心目中发明的,脱离
       了生活,那其价值也会值得怀疑了。
       1>novels, 最好的效果是能是反映人们的生活,feelings,如果reader能感受到自己就是其中的一个charactor的话,
         触动会最大。如果不能反映大众生活,那么就会没有人读了。
       2>Film,将一个小说一样的故事更感性的呈现给audience。其中的一句话,主角的一个眼神都可能成为观众心中永远的记忆。
         如果不能反映大众生活,就会枯燥。
       3>Music,其节奏只有易唱,内容都只有反映大众心声才能被广泛传唱。
      
     4.In sum,要保持自己的思考,同时参考大众和评论家的意见,调整自己作品的方向和内容,接近大众。
     
     TOPIC: ISSUE143 - "Artists should pay little attention to their critics.* Criticism tends to undermine and constrain the artist's creativity."
*those who evaluate works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

WORDS: 608          TIME: 00:45:03          DATE: 2007-7-31 11:36:51

I strongly disgree with author's assertion that it is right for artists to pay little attention to their critics because of the negative influence of criticism. Though in some circumstance criticism may undermine and constrain the artist's creativity, mostly, I still believe artists can benefit from these criticism.

Admitted, the works of the artists fall into the category of creative work, thus it is highly unlikely every one can understand their works and can appriciate them. History replete with such examples, Beethoven's eary listeners, accustomed to the traditional harmonies and melodic, regard his music hurting their ears. And Van Gogh, to of whose live paintings have broken all records in selling for $50 million, but he sold only one of his paintings in entire career. The artists usually have the unique perspective upon the world, and descript the world in the art language which we cannot understand without the specified training or the simlar experiences. The critics always serve as a bridge between the artists and the common people, who help intepret the meanings of arts which are hard to comprehend, and feed back the suggestion of audence and their own  to the artists as criticism. For some reasons, these criticisms do not always serve as helpful function. Fist , the background of critics still diffent from the artists', may be close to the background to the common people because they are from the common people. Second, the jealcy which may prevent the critics presenting the truely useful suggestions rather than the complaint. Thus, the critism from critism will sometimes undermine and contrain the artist's crativeity, serve as negative influence , as the author claimed.

Howere, perhaps the oldes defination of the function of arts is that they provide pleasure, they present pleasure to the people in the sociaty. Art has an effect on the individual and on a particular culture in a society. Psychologically, art enhances life by adding beauty to our surroundings. It is a source of pleasure and relaxation  from the stresses of life. Socially, art plays a number of different roles  by virtue of its capacity to embody symbolic significance to its audience. If the artists  igore the voices from the critics, ignore the suggestions from the audience, it is highly impossible that the arts will fulful their this function well.

Concider novel, which the artists tell the stories of the world, the people, the feelings of people in his papers. The most attractive novel are always those can most closely touch the feelings in the deep heart. The reader may find themselves one character of the story and their mood and feeling will go up and down according to the character's. Suppose a nove is just a fiction from the author's imagination, and disjoint with the real life, it will be hard to accepted by the readers.

And then concider film, which is the most popular form of arts thanks to the great development in technology. The film can provide the aundence a more sensitive, visusl way to learn a story. The same as novel, the audence can always put themselves in the story. Some classic dialog, or even a smile in the film can be impressed in our brain for a long time. A boring film which only tell the story of the artist's and make from vacuum can hardly has this effect.

To sum up, the artists should do their work creatively and not make any compromise blindly to satisfy the need of  the critics if they think it is right and mostly reflect the life of people, and be able to disinguish which critisms are helpful and which are not.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
893
注册时间
2007-4-15
精华
0
帖子
5
沙发
发表于 2007-7-31 12:37:20 |只看该作者
自己先拍拍,大家接着拍。

I strongly disagree with author's assertion that it is right for artists to pay little attention to their critics because of the negative influence of criticism. Though in some circumstance criticism may undermine and constrain the artist's creativity, mostly, I still (still 应该去掉)believe artists can benefit from these criticisms.

Admitted, the works of the artists fall into the category of creative work, thus it is highly unlikely every one can understand their works and can appreciate them. History is replete with such examples, Beethoven's early listeners, accustomed to the traditional harmonies and melodies, regard his music (dismissed his symphony as literally) hurting their ears. And Van Gogh, two of whose live paintings have broken all records in selling for $50 million, but he sold only one of his paintings in entire career. The artists usually have the unique perspective upon the world, and descript the world in the art language which we cannot understand without the specified training or the similar experiences. The critics always serve as a bridge between the artists and the common people, who help interpret the meanings of arts which are hard to comprehend, and feed back the suggestions of audience and their own to the artists as criticism. For some reasons, these criticisms do not always serve as helpful function. Fist, the background of critics still different from the artists', may be close to the background to the common people (audience) because they are from the common people (audience). Second, It is the self tendency which may prevent the critics presenting the truly useful suggestions rather than the complaints. Thus, the criticism from critics will sometimes undermine and constrain the artist's creativity, serve as negative influence , as the author claimed.

However, perhaps the oldest definition of the function of arts is that they provide pleasure. They present pleasure to the people in the society. Art has an effect on the individual and on a particular culture in a society. Psychologically, art enhances life by adding beauty to our surroundings. It is a source of pleasure and relaxation from the stresses of life. Socially, art plays a number of different roles by virtue of its capacity to embody symbolic significance to its audience. If the artists ignore the voices from the critics, ignore the suggestions from the audience, it is highly impossible that the arts will fulfill this function well.

Consider novel, which the artists tell the stories of the world, the people, and the feelings of people in his papers. The most attractive novels are always those can most closely touch the feelings in the deep heart. The reader may find themselves one character of the story and their mood and feeling will go up and down according to those of the characters. Suppose a novel is just a fiction from the author's imagination, and disjoint with the real life, it will be hard to be accepted by the readers.

And then consider film, which is the most popular form of arts thanks to the great development in technology. The film can provide the audience a more sensitive, visual way to learn a story. The same as novel, the audience can always put themselves in the story. Some classic dialog or even a smile in the film can be impressed in our brain for a long time. A boring film which only tell the story of the artist's and make from vacuum can hardly has this effect.

To sum up, the artists should do their work creatively and not make any compromise blindly to satisfy the need of the critics if they think it is right and mostly reflect the life of people, and be able to distinguish which criticism are helpful and which are not. That is to attach enough importance to the criticism while not give up their owns ideas.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
151
注册时间
2007-6-10
精华
0
帖子
6
板凳
发表于 2007-8-1 19:19:01 |只看该作者
自己先拍拍,大家接着拍。

I strongly disagree with author's assertion that it is right for artists to pay little attention to their critics because of the negative influence of criticism. Though in some circumstance criticism may undermine and constrain the artist's creativity, mostly, I still (still 应该去掉)believe artists can benefit from these criticisms.

Admitted, the works of the artists fall into the category of creative work, thus it is highly unlikely every one can understand their works and can appreciate them. History is replete with such examples, Beethoven's early listeners, accustomed to the traditional harmonies and melodies, regard his music (dismissed his symphony as literally) hurting their ears. And Van Gogh, two of whose live paintings have broken all records in selling for $50 million, but he sold only one of his paintings in entire career. The artists usually have the unique perspective upon the world, and descript the world in the art language which we cannot understand without the specified training or the similar experiences. The critics always serve as a bridge between the artists and the common people, who help interpret the meanings of arts which are hard to comprehend, and feed back the suggestions of audience and their own to the artists as criticism. For some reasons, these criticisms do not always serve as helpful function. Fist, the background of critics still different from the artists', may be close to the background to the common people (audience) because they are from the common people (audience). Second, It is the self tendency which may prevent the critics presenting the truly useful suggestions rather than the complaints. Thus, the criticism from critics will sometimes undermine and constrain the artist's creativity, serve as negative influence , as the author claimed.

However, perhaps the oldest definition of the function of arts is that they provide pleasure. They present pleasure to the people in the society. Art has an effect on the individual and on a particular culture in a society. Psychologically, art enhances life by adding beauty to our surroundings. It is a source of pleasure and relaxation from the stresses of life. Socially, art plays a number of different roles by virtue of its capacity to embody symbolic significance to its audience. If the artists ignore the voices from the critics, ignore the suggestions from the audience, it is highly impossible that the arts will fulfill this function well.

Consider novel, which the artists tell the stories of the world, the people, and the feelings of people in his papers. The most attractive novels are always those can most closely touch the feelings in the deep heart. The reader may find themselves one character of the story and their mood and feeling will go up and down according to those of the characters. Suppose a novel is just a fiction from the author's imagination, and disjoint with the real life, it will be hard to be accepted by the readers.

And then consider film, which is the most popular form of arts thanks to the great development in technology. The film can provide the audience a more sensitive, visual way to learn a story. The same as novel, the audience can always put themselves in the story. Some classic dialog or even a smile in the film can be impressed in our brain for a long time. A boring film which only tell the story of the artist's and make from vacuum can hardly has this effect.

To sum up, the artists should do their work creatively and not make any compromise blindly to satisfy the need of the critics if they think it is right and mostly reflect the life of people, and be able to distinguish which criticism are helpful and which are not. That is to attach enough importance to the criticism while not give up their owns ideas.


写的很好啊,破题语言都很棒啊,不过有一点啊公众并不能代表评论家的意见吧.我觉得可以对评论家有个准确定位.像是第一段从新颖性出发就很好,可能还是因为艺术类的例子太少了.不如哪个画魂的原型,在美国取得了巨大成功但是就是不能得到国人的认可,现在却用来作文中国女性立志的典型.文化的差异啊,观念的差异啊都有可能造成评论的影响,不过也正是因为评论的不理解更有可能促使艺术家勇往直前,那个贝多芬是不是可以用这里啊.
还有就是评论家的不好评论也有可能引起人们多作品的关注,比如无极啊,电影很垃圾,不过票房一样好,钱是赚了不少.一个艺术家一个作品的价值不能仅仅依靠评论家的评论来衡量,所以可以是动力也可以是反作用,不过现在越来越关心艺术家的能力,包括创意思想技巧已经传达给人的情感.

不 好意思啊,看到我该改的地方已经有人改了,本人语法具烂只能看看思路了,不一定对还请lz见量

使用道具 举报

RE: issue143 [0710G 戴三个表冲刺小组] 第6次作业 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue143 [0710G 戴三个表冲刺小组] 第6次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-713063-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部