寄托天下
查看: 682|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 096G 4 月机考组 argument 38 by kek [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
66
注册时间
2009-1-21
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-2-24 21:10:22 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
In this argument above, the writer recommends that a daily use of Ichthaid will prevent colds and reduce absenteeism based on a report that people in East Meria seldom visit the doctor for because of eating a amount of fish. It seems that  his argument is  logic at  first  sight . Under a careful examination, however we  will reveal how groundless it is.

In  the first place, the writer is failing in building  a logical causal relationship whether high consumption of fish is the  reason for seldom coming down with cold of people in East Meria.

There are many possible alternatives for the lowing ratio of cold. Such alternatives may be the factor of healthy of people in East Meria are in good condition, which make them not easy to be  illsuch as people have taken measure to prevent before cold is coming. It is probable that the transportation in East Meria is not very well-situated hospitals are far away, which  make  it  difficult  for people to  see doctor In addition, people in East Meria treat cold as a  trivial So, there isno  need  to drive along to see a  doctor.

secondly
even if high consumption of fish is  associated with lowing radio of cold in East Meria, could automatically works effective in every area. The writer ignores an important possibility that city of East Meria is the vicinity of a lake or sea, so people in there could eat fish every day. However, it is  far from sea, or no sea or lake around them, we could image how people in that places gain plentiful fish to prevent cold? the writer have failed in  considering  the true reason behind absences from school and work. Perhaps that some student do not like go to school, they want stay home to play computer game. Or that people have things need to deal in  short time. From this  respect ,  claiming cold as a subterfuge will be a good way for not going to school or work.

In  short
, the writer has not provided us  with enough evidence to support the advice,. To strengthen the argument, the writer should consider all possible alternatives To better evaluate the memo, we need more information  of  the proportion of fish oil in Ichthaid.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: 096G 4 月机考组 argument 38 by kek [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
096G 4 月机考组 argument 38 by kek
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-920649-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部