返回列表

查看: 14475|回复: 6

[问答] 一道阅读题 [复制链接]

小天一诶
UID: 3283403

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 75
寄托币: 180
注册时间: 2012-3-29
精华: 0
帖子: 21

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2015-11-5 16:30:19 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

A divide between aesthetic and technical considerations has played a crucial role in mapmaking and cartographic scholarship. Since nineteenth century cartographers, for instance, understood themselves as technicians who did not care about visual effects, while others saw themselves as landscape painters. That dichotomy structured the discipline of the history of cartography. Until the 1980s, in what Blakemore and Harley called “the Old is Beautiful Paradigm,” scholars largely focused on maps made before 1800, marveling at their beauty and sometimes regretting the decline of the pre-technical age. Early mapmaking was considered art while modern cartography was located within the realm of engineering utility. Alpers, however, has argued that this boundary would have puzzled mapmakers in the seventeenth century, because they considered themselves to be visual engineers.

2. It can be inferred from the passage that, beginning in the 1980s, historians of cartography
　　A. placed greater emphasis on the beauty of maps made after 1800
　　B. expanded their range of study to include more material created after 1800
　　C. grew more sensitive to the way mapmakers prior to 1800 conceived of their work
　　D. came to see the visual details of maps as aesthetic objects rather than practical cartographic aids
　　E. reduced the attention they paid to the technical aspects of mapmaking

为什么选B啊救命。。。。。。求点拨！谢谢

相关帖子 Updated by 2025.01.04

回应
1

使用道具举报

小天一诶
UID: 3283403

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 75
寄托币: 180
注册时间: 2012-3-29
精华: 0
帖子: 21

沙发

发表于 2015-11-5 17:42:11 |只看该作者

有人吗:dizzy:

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报

辰南
UID: 3613235

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 226
寄托币: 1623
注册时间: 2015-4-22
精华: 1
帖子: 459

板凳

发表于 2015-11-5 18:11:26 |只看该作者

Until the 1980s, in what Blakemore and Harley called “the Old is Beautiful Paradigm,” scholars largely focused on maps made before 1800, marveling at their beauty and sometimes regretting the decline of the pre-technical age

在1980s 前主要看早于1800的maps 然后你取个反

使用道具举报

小天一诶
UID: 3283403

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 75
寄托币: 180
注册时间: 2012-3-29
精华: 0
帖子: 21

地板

发表于 2015-11-5 20:46:15 |只看该作者

辰南发表于 2015-11-5 18:11
Until the 1980s, in what Blakemore and Harley called “the Old is Beautiful Paradigm,” scholars lar ...

噢，我知道我哪里搞错了，谢谢！

使用道具举报

yo_guss
UID: 3770182

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 50
寄托币: 3
注册时间: 2016-11-29
精华: 0
帖子: 2

5楼

发表于 2016-11-29 08:29:42 来自手机 |只看该作者

求解第一题为什么选A

使用道具举报

yo_guss
UID: 3770182

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 50
寄托币: 3
注册时间: 2016-11-29
精华: 0
帖子: 2

6楼

发表于 2016-11-29 08:30:38 来自手机 |只看该作者

According to the passage, Alpers would say that the assumptions underlying the “paradigm” were

　　A. inconsistent with the way some mapmakers prior to 1800 understand their own work

　　B. dependent on a seventeenth-century conception of mapmaking visual engineering

　　C. unconcerned with the difference between the aesthetic and technical questions of mapmaking

　　D. insensitive to divisions among cartographers working in the period after 1800

　　E. supported by the demonstrable technical superiority of mapmaking made after 1800

使用道具举报