寄托天下
查看: 14258|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] pp2 test2-hard-archaeological sites in China's Yangtze river [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
12
寄托币
534
注册时间
2011-8-31
精华
0
帖子
207

2013offer达人

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-9 09:57:12 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 小硕鼠 于 2014-8-10 14:14 编辑

这篇文章三道题感觉每一道题是清楚的。好受伤啊,本来阅读就差,打算看看机经也没看懂。。求高手指教!  第一题:看了答案之后才觉得C可能是对的,但是自己想就根本确定不了啊。谁能跟我说说这个思路是什么吗?多谢!
第二题:我选的是A,我觉得没有时间上的证据证明那个更早,这应该挺合理的吧。然后看了正确答案是B,也觉得B也有道理
第三题:选D,这个我是看了答案也不知道为什么。
求讲解!任何一个都可以,多谢多谢!
贴文章题目如下:




Since the 1970s, archaeological sites in China's Yangtze River region have yielded
evidence of sophisticated rice-farming societies that predate signs of rice cultivation elsewhere
in East Asia by a thousand years. Before this evidence was discovered, it had generally been
assumed that rice farming began farther to the south. This scenario was based both on the
geographic range of wild or free-living rice, which was not thought to extend as far north as the
Yangtze, and on archaeological records of very early domestic rice from Southeast Asia and
India (now known to be not so old as first reported). Proponents of the southern-origin theory
point out that early rice-farming societies along the Yangtze were already highly developed and
that evidence for the first stage of rice cultivation is missing. They argue that the first
hunter-gatherers to develop rice agriculture must have done so in this southern zone, within
the apparent present-day geographic range of wild rice.

Yet while most stands of wild rice reported in a 1984 survey were concentrated to the
south of the Yangtze drainage, two northern outlier populations were also discovered in
provinces along the middle and lower Yangtze, evidence that the Yangtze wetlands may fall
within both the present-day and the historical geographic ranges of rice's wild ancestor.



2.1. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the conclusion that the
author makes based on the 1984 survey?

A. Areas south of the Yangtze basin currently have less wild-rice habitat than they once did.

B. Surveys since 1984 have shown wild rice populations along the upper Yangtze as well as
along the middle and lower Yangtze.
C. The populations of wild rice along the Yangtze represent strains of wild rice that migrated to
the north relatively recently.
D. Early rice-farming societies along the Yangtze were not as highly developed as
archaeologists once thought.
E. In East Asia, the historical geographic range of wild rice was more extensive than the
present-day geographic range is.





2.2. Based on the passage, skeptics of the idea that rice cultivation began in the Yangtze River
region can point to which of the following for support?
A. Lack of evidence supporting the existence of rice-farming societies along the Yangtze at an
early date
B. Lack of evidence regarding the initial stages of rice cultivation in the Yangtze region
C. Recent discoveries pertaining to the historical geographic range of rice's wild ancestor
D. New information regarding the dates of very early domestic rice from Southeast Asia
E. New theories pertaining to how hunter-gatherers first developed rice agriculture in East Asia





2. 3. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the “southern-origin
theory”?
A. The theory is based on an unconventional understanding of how hunter-gatherers first
developed rice agriculture.
B. The theory fails to take into account the apparent fact that evidence for the first stage of rice
cultivation in the north is missing.
C. The theory was developed primarily in response to a 1984 survey of wild rice's geographic
range.
D. Reassessment of the dates of some archaeological evidence has undermined support for the
theory.
E. Evidence of sophisticated rice-farming societies in the Yangtze region provides support for
the theory.

答案:CBD
回应
1

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
390
注册时间
2012-5-16
精华
0
帖子
125
沙发
发表于 2012-10-9 11:31:49 |只看该作者
楼主没有看懂文章,这篇文章是讨论古代大米种植到底有没有到扬子江那么北面,因为大米通常被认为在南方生长~~~
那个第二段支持southern-origin theory的人指出了一些证据证明扬子江(不是长江哈)那么北面的地方是不可能在古代产大米的,论据有二,第一是说扬子江区域在古代已经有了高度发达的农业;第二是说扬子江地区缺乏first stage的大米种植证据。他们又说因此由狩猎到大米种植农业的演进应该发生在南方,由于很明显的present-day的证据。
第三段我个人理解是与第二段present-day证据相对应的指出了一些historical的证据,1984年的survey说明了虽然大部分大米种植发生在扬子江流域的南部,但曾经出现过两个northern outlier的特例发生在扬子江流域,这证明了古代扬子江地区是有大米种植的证据的。
因此文章结尾一句说这个种植既有present也有historical的证据~

楼主再自己体会下哈,我是这样理解的

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
390
注册时间
2012-5-16
精华
0
帖子
125
板凳
发表于 2012-10-9 11:35:43 |只看该作者
啊。。。我错了,刚查了下真的是长江。。。:L
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
茶思 + 1 赞一个,Yangtze 就是扬子江,属于长江的一.

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
180
寄托币
1699
注册时间
2012-7-17
精华
0
帖子
340
地板
发表于 2012-10-9 13:54:40 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 saber恩叶 于 2012-10-9 13:57 编辑

2.1
1984survey说的是这个水稻发源长江南边也有,北边也有那么一两种。C选项说北边的水稻是最近才移植过去的,而不是本来就在北边的,削弱了那个survey的结论。

2.2
Proponents of the southern-origin theory point out that early rice-farming societies along the Yangtze were already highly developed and that evidence for the first stage of rice cultivation is missing.
B选项原文重复。【不管其他选项长的你觉得有多么合理,原文重复的那个一定是正确答案。

2.3
这一题先前我看过去的时候觉得一个都不对。。。然后用排除法做的
A.unconventional没提,而且base也不对,错
B.这个是southern-origin theory跟north没关系,错
C.1984survey已经再将另一个方面了,错
E.第一句里说了sophisticated rice-farming什么的是一个evidence的结果,后面一句说了before this evidence 是southern-origin theory,错

D.This scenario was based both on the geographic range of wild or free-living rice, which was not thought to extend as far north as the Yangtze, and on archaeological records of very early domestic rice from Southeast Asia and India (now known to be not so old as first reported).
所以Reassessment of the dates of some archaeological evidence has undermined support for the theory~

话说这个文章一下长江南啊北的,一下长江地区南北上中下游的,还有wild rice和domestic rice什么的,看着真晕@@...
已有 2 人评分声望 收起 理由
gkso + 1 弓虽!
Ninalala3333 + 2 精华!

总评分: 声望 + 3   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
390
注册时间
2012-5-16
精华
0
帖子
125
5
发表于 2012-10-9 14:27:16 |只看该作者
saber恩叶 发表于 2012-10-9 13:54
2.1
1984survey说的是这个水稻发源长江南边也有,北边也有那么一两种。C选项说北边的水稻是最近才移植过去 ...

我还是想问问2.3那个E项,就是在原文proponents那句里不是point out这点了么,为什么是错的呢?是不是说这个sophisticated rice-farming出现在了长江但是由于缺少first stage的证据这两个部分合起来才是支持发源南方的理论?
我个人的理解是南方发源理论的支持者说长江是有精耕细作的大米社会出现的证据呀,但是却没有大米养殖最初阶段的证据,潜台词是说明你长江的大米是从南方培育后带过去的,不知道对不对。。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
12
寄托币
534
注册时间
2011-8-31
精华
0
帖子
207

2013offer达人

6
发表于 2012-10-9 14:32:07 |只看该作者
avrilcongcong 发表于 2012-10-9 11:31
楼主没有看懂文章,这篇文章是讨论古代大米种植到底有没有到扬子江那么北面,因为大米通常被认为在南方生长 ...

谢谢!其实什么江都是个名字,哈哈。看懂文章才是硬道理。多谢啦!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
12
寄托币
534
注册时间
2011-8-31
精华
0
帖子
207

2013offer达人

7
发表于 2012-10-9 14:32:46 |只看该作者
saber恩叶 发表于 2012-10-9 13:54
2.1
1984survey说的是这个水稻发源长江南边也有,北边也有那么一两种。C选项说北边的水稻是最近才移植过去 ...

懂了!多谢!请问机经真的有用吗?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
180
寄托币
1699
注册时间
2012-7-17
精华
0
帖子
340
8
发表于 2012-10-10 16:42:47 |只看该作者
dsnadja 发表于 2012-10-9 14:32
懂了!多谢!请问机经真的有用吗?

可以考前看看,反正什么文章都是读,但是想靠机经押题就不建议了

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
180
寄托币
1699
注册时间
2012-7-17
精华
0
帖子
340
9
发表于 2012-10-10 16:54:34 |只看该作者
avrilcongcong 发表于 2012-10-9 14:27
我还是想问问2.3那个E项,就是在原文proponents那句里不是point out这点了么,为什么是错的呢?是不是说这 ...

我对那个proponent的话也是这样理解的,但是sophisticated rice-farming是为了说明predate signs of rice cultivation elsewhere  in East Asia by a thousand years,用来支持的是Yangze River region是种植水稻的发源这一个观点,和southern-origin  theory要表达的不是同一个意思。
细节部分sophisticated rice-farming确实很容易和already highly developed搞混,但是从出现的位置和文章结构来看就比较清晰了:sophisticated rice-farming在第一句话,第一句话支持的是Yangze River region的观点;紧接着出现Before,后面跟着一个generally assumed的观点;再往后看发现这个观点就是southern-origin  theory,也就是题干问的。所以说sophisticated rice-farming并不是支持southern-origin  theory的。
估计在考场上我也绕不了这么多,真遇到了就随缘吧。。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
390
注册时间
2012-5-16
精华
0
帖子
125
10
发表于 2012-10-10 17:26:27 |只看该作者
saber恩叶 发表于 2012-10-10 16:54
我对那个proponent的话也是这样理解的,但是sophisticated rice-farming是为了说明predate signs of rice ...

恩,我明白了,就暂且这么理解吧~明天就考了爱咋地咋地了哈哈

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
180
寄托币
1699
注册时间
2012-7-17
精华
0
帖子
340
11
发表于 2012-10-10 18:03:52 |只看该作者
avrilcongcong 发表于 2012-10-10 17:26
恩,我明白了,就暂且这么理解吧~明天就考了爱咋地咋地了哈哈

加油~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
50
寄托币
15
注册时间
2014-8-17
精华
0
帖子
10
12
发表于 2014-8-17 02:25:04 |只看该作者
扬子江:长江下游河段的旧称扬子江,原来国际上讲Yangtze River就是长江呀

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
52
寄托币
83
注册时间
2014-5-28
精华
0
帖子
54
13
发表于 2014-8-17 10:47:32 |只看该作者
Got it!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
52
寄托币
83
注册时间
2014-5-28
精华
0
帖子
54
14
发表于 2014-8-17 10:47:43 |只看该作者
Got it!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
52
寄托币
83
注册时间
2014-5-28
精华
0
帖子
54
15
发表于 2014-8-17 10:49:55 |只看该作者
Got it!

使用道具 举报

RE: pp2 test2-hard-archaeological sites in China's Yangtze river [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
pp2 test2-hard-archaeological sites in China's Yangtze river
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1455802-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
关闭

站长推荐

【招生宣讲】香港科技大学(广州) 科技与政策理学硕士项目
今晚19:00直播!感兴趣的小伙伴搬起小板凳前排占座啦!

查看 »

报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部