1. 写作文前没有认真读题,根本没搞清楚题目里涉及的issue是什么,就凭感觉写。
比如这道题 https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1778799
10) Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
这里讲的很清楚是讨论要不要立法preserve wilderness,但是互改中的同学想当然的写环保问题,这样不认真审题,写出来的文章自然不可能切题。
2. 误信某些参考书所提倡的正反正的写法,没有提出整合的观点,也没有按照题目的具体要求来写作。
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
比如这个要求讲明是讨论实施这个政策的后果,也就是整篇文章都要围绕着各种后果来写。
Scores 3 and 2.5: Displays some competence in analytical writing, although the writing is flawed in at least one of the following ways: limited analysis or development; weak organization; weak control of sentence structure or language usage, with errors that often result in vagueness or lack of clarity.