[问答] 36套 exercise 3.2 第四题 [复制链接]

KevinLu_1997
UID: 3688647

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 50
寄托币: 31
注册时间: 2016-1-25
精华: 0
帖子: 9

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2016-1-27 15:16:07 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

In Hardy‘s novels, various impulses were sacrificed to each other inevitably and often. Inevitably, because Hardy did not care in the way that novelists such as
Line Flaubert or James cared, and therefore took paths of least 5 resistance. Thus, one impulse often surrendered to a fresher one and, unfortunately, instead of exacting a
compromise, simply disappeared. A desire to throw over reality a light that never was might give way abruptly to the desire on the part of what we might consider a
10 novelist-scientist to record exactly and concretely the structure and texture of a flower. In this instance, the new impulse was at least an energetic one, and thus its indulgence did not result in a relaxed style. But on other occasions Hardy abandoned a perilous, risky, and highly
15 energizing impulse in favor of what was for him the fatally relaxing impulse to classify and schematize abstractly. When a relaxing impulse was indulged, the style—that sure index of an author‘s literary worth—was certain to become verbose. (167 words)

The passage supplies information to suggest that its author would be most likely to agree with
which of the following statements about the novelists Flaubert and James?
(A) They indulged more impulses in their
novels than did Hardy in his novels. (B) They have elicited a greater degree of
favorable response from most literary
critics than has Hardy.
(C) In the writing of their novels, they often
took pains to effect a compromise among
their various novelistic impulses. (D) Regarding novelistic construction, they
cared more about the opinions of other novelists than about the opinions of ordinary readers.
(E) They wrote novels in which the impulse toward realism and the impulse away from realism were evident in equal measure.
问题问的是 F和J 与作者的不同之处, 首先C 选项是正确的, 但是请帮我看看A 选项, 原文说 Thus, one impulse often surrendered to a fresher one and, unfortunately, instead of exacting a
compromise, simply disappeared. 一个 impulse 向另外一个 impulse surrender 然后 disappear 这不是Impulse 越来越少吗, 这是H 的观点, 取反之后得到 F 和 J 的观点, indulge more impulses 不就是impulse 变多了吗, 谢谢大家

相关帖子 Updated by 2025.04.02

0 0

qwhrp94
UID: 3582413

特级会员

Rank: 6 Rank: 6

声望: 459
寄托币: 4183
注册时间: 2014-12-10
精华: 2
帖子: 646

沙发

发表于 2016-1-28 17:15:32 |只看该作者

在看选项时，我一开始保留的也是A和C.
A选项的错误在于，文章提到了Hardy用fresher one后，就让先前的impulse消失了。然而作者并没有提到Hardy与F，J使用的impulse的总数量，虽然Hardy采用了类似于替代的方法，但是我们并不能因此断定FJ比Hardy使用了更多的impulse.
举个例子来说，Hardy开始时使用了3个impulse,尔后使用新impulse代替旧的，最终仍然是3个impulse。而FJ开始时使用1个impulse，尔后加入另一个impulse，最后总共两个impulse。此时Hardy仍然使用了更多的impulse.
这个选项是一个陷阱，确实比较容易错选。排除的关键在于是否意识到了文中的表述与impulse的总数没有直接的关系。
而C选项是直接取非，相信LZ已经知道怎样选出C选项了。

投票：加拿大女研究生择校滑铁卢eceVS渥太华cs