[i习作temp] issue87 【G流勇进小组作业】羽 [复制链接]

peger
UID：2236982

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 148
注册时间: 2006-8-1
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2007-3-20 22:25:06 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

TOPIC: ISSUE87 - "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
WORDS: 314 - 536       TIME: 0:45:00 +30       DATE: 2007-3-20
AWP限时失败，

新人更有求知欲。不过的专业训练有时会磨灭我们的激情。举了莎士比亚是学徒，诺贝尔文学奖很多是非专业人士。
新人没什么负担，可以冒险。举了爱迪生为了自己的私利而不采用交流电的例子，反面。
专家也可以保持自己的创新性，例子是现代艺术大师马塞尔杜尚，一生标签无数，游走于各个领域，老而弥“新”
结尾，能否有新的发现不在于身份上是新人还是旧人，而在于自己面对事物的态度。

According to the experience and foundation possessed, the experts should be more likely to be the leading discoverer in his or her own realm. Nevertheless, the reality is fairly in the contrary. To analyze the pros and the cons of the two groups, may I conclude a convincing reason.

The very purpose for us to acquire knowledge is to know what you desire to. One's interests will be aroused tremendously if he meets something fresh and interesting. If researchers try to state the times we ask question, he will find it plummet since we become, if there is, mature. Being indifferent is not a good deed for inquiring. My friend, who is studying in the department of literature, told me sadly that, even her department is the top one in its own realm, few of the graduates had become preeminent writers but influential critics or journalists. On accountant of years of study in the language, the ambition is melted, one only focuses in the grammar, which is sophisticated and trivial.  In fact, Shakespeare was once a apprenticed and a butcher before he worked in theatre, and the Nobel prize winners in literature are mainly not professional educated. Things they have in common are that they all observe the life carefully, consider the events insightfully and express them enthusiastically.

Even the purpose to advance still exists in the expert's mind, the achievement he have already acquired may fail him with the rookie as well. The starters are eager to establish his own fame, and he will try any way, regardless it is risky, hence he has few to lose.  We are familiar with the silicon valley stories, in which some nobody starts his career from the garage or dormitory to multinational cooperation, but few have we heard a fonder from a millionaire family. Needless to say the great inventor Thomas Edison, whose foundation even become the obstacle and misguide his judgement.  Due to the direct current distribution system he has set up, Edison was prone to adopt direct current instead of alternating current, regardless the merit of AC that it makes possible the economical transmission of electric power over long distance.

Still, experts could and ought to lead the way if they refrain to be arbitrary or conservative. A good point in case is Marcel Duchamp, an French-born American artist, even he denied being called so however, who has major impact to the direction of 20-century's art. Looking in his biography, he introduced the art movement of cubism and dada to United States, and was influential in surrealism. Moreover, his identity was once connected with installation art and conceptual art. A quotation from Duchamp can well explain the reason" Art may be good, bad, indifferent, but, whatever adjective is used, we must call it art." Duchamp kept his mind open and never took his fame seriously. Thus, he was never fazed by the critics, and consequently reformed the method to express and refreshed people's image of art.

In sum, whether a man can continually discover is not depend on the identity. Let alone he is an expert or a beginner, one can cruise to a new world and embrace outstanding discoveries if he keep his mind open.