A2
The arguer considers that property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase if the residents adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. However, I could not draw the same conclusion as the arguer declaims after I carefully test the evidences. There are several logical flaws in the arguer's argument, as discussed below.
First of all, the Argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that the average property values will increase like Brookville but he does not provide any evidence that the Brookville and Deerhaven Acres are indeed comparable. As we know, the values of a community differ conspicuously. It depends on many conditions such as location, quality of buildings and convenience of communication. The landscapes and adorn of building are subordinate factors. As a result, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville do not establish a warranted analogy. So we cannot safely assume that the auger's opinion is inerrant.
Secondly, the restrictions of Brookville community have been set up for seven years. During these years, it is possible that property values of all other communities nearby Brookville have risen fivefold. Comparing that the property values of Brookville have only tripled in the last seven years, the restrictions about landscape and exteriors' colors might be the reason which affect the property values. Or perhaps the other communities' property values have also tripled as Brookville during seven years. Then, the set of restrictions of Brookville has little use. Without any compared data about other communities nearby, I could not be convinced that it is the restrictions that help to increase property values of Brookville.
Thirdly, even if the set of restrictions of Brookville is helpful, it is possible that there are other methods to increase the average property values of Brookville. Perhaps some rich owners adorned their houses inside using very expensive materials to sharply raise the property of their houses, which increased the average proper of Brookville. Or perhaps a lot of famous companies founded nearby making property of Brookville more expensive, which push the raise of Brookville community's property.
At last, the arguer does not provide any evidence to support that a set of restrictions in Deerhaven Acres on landscaping and housepainting could be accepted by residents. The residents of Deer haven Acres might have customs to adorn their own house, or they like to change their outside landscapes and colors often. Moreover, to keep outside adorn of all the buildings similar lies on some disadvantages to embarrass the restrictions, such as it is difficult for residents to find their own houses.
In summary, the arguer should provide more evidences to support his suggestion. Unless he gives more detailed information comparing Brookville with Deerville Acres, I am not sure that the property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase after the residents adopt their own set of restriction on landscaping and housepainting.
The arguer considers that property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase if the residents adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. However, I could not draw the same conclusion as the arguer declaims after I carefully test the evidences. There are several logical flaws in the arguer's(有点重复 可以不要) argument, as discussed below.
First of all, the Argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that the average property values will increase like Brookville but he does not provide any evidence that the Brookville and Deerhaven Acres are indeed comparable. As we know, the values of a community differ conspicuously. It depends on many conditions such as location, quality of buildings and convenience of communication.(更交流有什么关系 what about the traffics nearby) The landscapes and adorn of building are subordinate factors. As a result, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville do not establish a warranted analogy. So we cannot safely assume that the auger's opinion is inerrant.
Secondly, the restrictions of Brookville community have been set up for seven years. During these years, it is possible that property values of all other communities nearby Brookville have risen fivefold. Comparing that the property values of Brookville have only tripled in the last seven years, the restrictions about landscape and exteriors' colors might be the reason which affect the property values. Or perhaps the other communities' property values have also tripled as Brookville during seven years. Then, the set of restrictions of Brookville has little use. Without any compared data about other communities nearby, I could not be convinced that it is the restrictions that help to increase property values of Brookville.
Thirdly, even if the set of restrictions of Brookville is helpful, it is possible that there are other methods to increase the average property values of Brookville. Perhaps some rich owners adorned their houses inside using very expensive materials to sharply raise the property of their houses, which increased the average proper of Brookville. Or perhaps a lot of famous companies founded nearby making property of Brookville more expensive, which push the raise of Brookville community's property.
At last, the arguer does not provide any evidence to support that a set of restrictions in Deerhaven Acres on landscaping and housepainting could be accepted by residents. The residents of Deer haven Acres might have customs to adorn their own house, or they like to change their outside landscapes and colors often. Moreover, to keep outside adorn of all the buildings similar lies on some disadvantages to embarrass the restrictions, such as it is difficult for residents to find their own houses.
In summary, the arguer should provide more evidences to support his suggestion. Unless he gives more detailed information comparing Brookville with Deerville Acres, I am not sure that the property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase after the residents adopt their own set of restriction on landscaping and housepainting.
总体来说错误都写到了,但是每个错误还可以展开来些 论证比较泛 可以尝试深入些
A2
The arguer considers that property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase if the residents adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. However, I could not draw the same conclusion as the arguer declaims after I carefully test the evidences. There are several logical flaws in the arguer's argument, as discussed below.(开头偶喜欢)
First of all, the Argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that the average property values will increase like Brookville but he does not provide any evidence that the Brookville and Deerhaven Acres are indeed comparable. As we know, the values of a community differ conspicuously. It depends on many conditions such as location, quality of buildings and convenience of communication. The landscapes and adorn of building are subordinate factors. (还要具体点,加上句 if .B的房子是山区,而A的房子是豪华商业区什么的, 最后要得到结论那么即使像在A一样措施执行了,在B地还是得不到效果--一定要推出这个结论)As a result, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville do not establish a warranted analogy. So we cannot safely assume that the auger's opinion is inerrant.
Secondly, the restrictions of Brookville community have been set up for seven years. During these years, it is possible that property values of all other communities nearby Brookville have risen fivefold. Comparing that the property values of Brookville have only tripled in the last seven years, the restrictions about landscape and exteriors' colors might be the reason which affect the property values. Or perhaps the other communities' property values have also tripled as Brookville during seven years. Then, the set of restrictions of Brookville has little use. Without any compared data about other communities nearby, I could not be convinced that it is the restrictions that help to increase property values of Brookville.
Thirdly, even if the set of restrictions of Brookville is helpful, it is possible that there are other methods to increase the average property values of Brookville. Perhaps some rich owners adorned their houses inside using very expensive materials to sharply raise the property of their houses, which increased the average proper of Brookville. Or perhaps a lot of famous companies founded nearby making property of Brookville more expensive, which push the raise of Brookville community's property.
At last, the arguer does not provide any evidence to support that a set of restrictions in Deerhaven Acres on landscaping and housepainting could be accepted by residents. The residents of Deer haven Acres might have customs to adorn their own house, or they like to change their outside landscapes and colors often. (但是在有restriction的时候,会怎么样呢? 不买帐? 最后房价涨不起来?(一定要得到相反的结论))Moreover, to keep outside adorn of all the buildings similar lies on some disadvantages to embarrass the restrictions, such as it is difficult for residents to find their own houses.
In summary, the arguer should provide more evidences to support his suggestion. Unless he gives more detailed information comparing Brookville with Deerville Acres, I am not sure that the property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase after the residents adopt their own set of restriction on landscaping and housepainting.