argument2 勇往直前小组第四天

zhangjing106UID：2157010

A2
The arguer considers that property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase if the residents adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. However, I could not draw the same conclusion as the arguer declaims after I carefully test the evidences. There are several logical flaws in the arguer's argument, as discussed below.

First of all, the Argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that the average property values will increase like Brookville but he does not provide any evidence that the Brookville and Deerhaven Acres are indeed comparable. As we know, the values of a community differ conspicuously. It depends on many conditions such as location, quality of buildings and convenience of communication. The landscapes and adorn of building are subordinate factors. As a result, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville do not establish a warranted analogy. So we cannot safely assume that the auger's opinion is inerrant.

Secondly, the restrictions of Brookville community have been set up for seven years. During these years, it is possible that property values of all other communities nearby Brookville have risen fivefold. Comparing that the property values of Brookville have only tripled in the last seven years, the restrictions about landscape and exteriors' colors might be the reason which affect the property values. Or perhaps the other communities' property values have also tripled as Brookville during seven years. Then, the set of restrictions of Brookville has little use. Without any compared data about other communities nearby, I could not be convinced that it is the restrictions that help to increase property values of Brookville.

Thirdly, even if the set of restrictions of Brookville is helpful, it is possible that there are other methods to increase the average property values of Brookville. Perhaps some rich owners adorned their houses inside using very expensive materials to sharply raise the property of their houses, which increased the average proper of Brookville. Or perhaps a lot of famous companies founded nearby making property of Brookville more expensive, which push the raise of Brookville community's property.

At last, the arguer does not provide any evidence to support that a set of restrictions in Deerhaven Acres on landscaping and housepainting could be accepted by residents. The residents of Deer haven Acres might have customs to adorn their own house, or they like to change their outside landscapes and colors often. Moreover, to keep outside adorn of all the buildings similar lies on some disadvantages to embarrass the restrictions, such as it is difficult for residents to find their own houses.

In summary, the arguer should provide more evidences to support his suggestion. Unless he gives more detailed information comparing Brookville with Deerville Acres, I am not sure that the property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase after the residents adopt their own set of restriction on landscaping and housepainting.

178.
1、牙刷是否能够计件来算工资？计件的方法很难实施，例如在流水线上
2、有可能质量得不到保障。工人追求数量忽视质量。给工厂造成损失。
3、没证据证明能留住更好的工人。做的快不一定做的好。

161．
1、调查的可信度。调查设计的问题里面可能没有神话小说这个选项，并不是被访者错误的表达了习惯。
2、调查的人不是经常去图书馆。因为喜欢古典文学的人经常会收藏书籍反复阅读，而不会去图书馆看。还有其他的场所提供给人们看古典文学。也有可能图书馆内古典文学的收藏书籍较少。
3．有些古典小说也是神话小说。

202．
1、人类不用和动物接触也能造成动物的灭绝。
2、大型哺乳动物的骨头可能已经在这么多年的自然作用中消失了，也可能是人类把骨头用于其他用途。
3、就算不是人类的行为造成大型哺乳动物的灭绝。没有证明是气候的原因或者是环境因素造成物种的灭绝，可能自相残杀和优胜劣汰造成物种的灭绝。

133．
1、没证据证明A高中的学生会喜欢课外计算机科技课程。
2、没证据证明T高中和A高中可以比较。可能T校的学生理科的多，喜欢计算机的多。而A校可能文科的学生多，如果改成计算机课程，可能学的人更少。
3、没有关于学生的调查，不知道学生是怎么想的。

[ 本帖最后由 zhangjing106 于 2007-7-23 23:33 编辑 ]

sweetbettyUID：2359460

The arguer considers that property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase if the residents adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. However, I could not draw the same conclusion as the arguer declaims after I carefully test the evidences. There are several logical flaws in the arguer's（有点重复 可以不要） argument, as discussed below.

First of all, the Argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that the average property values will increase like Brookville but he does not provide any evidence that the Brookville and Deerhaven Acres are indeed comparable. As we know, the values of a community differ conspicuously. It depends on many conditions such as location, quality of buildings and convenience of communication.（更交流有什么关系 what about the traffics nearby） The landscapes and adorn of building are subordinate factors. As a result, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville do not establish a warranted analogy. So we cannot safely assume that the auger's opinion is inerrant.

Secondly, the restrictions of Brookville community have been set up for seven years. During these years, it is possible that property values of all other communities nearby Brookville have risen fivefold. Comparing that the property values of Brookville have only tripled in the last seven years, the restrictions about landscape and exteriors' colors might be the reason which affect the property values. Or perhaps the other communities' property values have also tripled as Brookville during seven years. Then, the set of restrictions of Brookville has little use. Without any compared data about other communities nearby, I could not be convinced that it is the restrictions that help to increase property values of Brookville.

Thirdly, even if the set of restrictions of Brookville is helpful, it is possible that there are other methods to increase the average property values of Brookville. Perhaps some rich owners adorned their houses inside using very expensive materials to sharply raise the property of their houses, which increased the average proper of Brookville. Or perhaps a lot of famous companies founded nearby making property of Brookville more expensive, which push the raise of Brookville community's property.

At last, the arguer does not provide any evidence to support that a set of restrictions in Deerhaven Acres on landscaping and housepainting could be accepted by residents. The residents of Deer haven Acres might have customs to adorn their own house, or they like to change their outside landscapes and colors often. Moreover, to keep outside adorn of all the buildings similar lies on some disadvantages to embarrass the restrictions, such as it is difficult for residents to find their own houses.

In summary, the arguer should provide more evidences to support his suggestion. Unless he gives more detailed information comparing Brookville with Deerville Acres, I am not sure that the property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase after the residents adopt their own set of restriction on landscaping and housepainting.
总体来说错误都写到了，但是每个错误还可以展开来些 论证比较泛 可以尝试深入些

nornsUID：2325187

A2
The arguer considers that property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase if the residents adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. However, I could not draw the same conclusion as the arguer declaims after I carefully test the evidences. There are several logical flaws in the arguer's argument, as discussed below.(开头偶喜欢)

First of all, the Argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that the average property values will increase like Brookville but he does not provide any evidence that the Brookville and Deerhaven Acres are indeed comparable. As we know, the values of a community differ conspicuously. It depends on many conditions such as location, quality of buildings and convenience of communication. The landscapes and adorn of building are subordinate factors. （还要具体点，加上句 if .B的房子是山区，而A的房子是豪华商业区什么的， 最后要得到结论那么即使像在A一样措施执行了，在B地还是得不到效果－－一定要推出这个结论）As a result, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville do not establish a warranted analogy. So we cannot safely assume that the auger's opinion is inerrant.

Secondly, the restrictions of Brookville community have been set up for seven years. During these years, it is possible that property values of all other communities nearby Brookville have risen fivefold. Comparing that the property values of Brookville have only tripled in the last seven years, the restrictions about landscape and exteriors' colors might be the reason which affect the property values. Or perhaps the other communities' property values have also tripled as Brookville during seven years. Then, the set of restrictions of Brookville has little use. Without any compared data about other communities nearby, I could not be convinced that it is the restrictions that help to increase property values of Brookville.

Thirdly, even if the set of restrictions of Brookville is helpful, it is possible that there are other methods to increase the average property values of Brookville. Perhaps some rich owners adorned their houses inside using very expensive materials to sharply raise the property of their houses, which increased the average proper of Brookville. Or perhaps a lot of famous companies founded nearby making property of Brookville more expensive, which push the raise of Brookville community's property.

At last, the arguer does not provide any evidence to support that a set of restrictions in Deerhaven Acres on landscaping and housepainting could be accepted by residents. The residents of Deer haven Acres might have customs to adorn their own house, or they like to change their outside landscapes and colors often. （但是在有restriction的时候，会怎么样呢？ 不买帐？ 最后房价涨不起来？（一定要得到相反的结论））Moreover, to keep outside adorn of all the buildings similar lies on some disadvantages to embarrass the restrictions, such as it is difficult for residents to find their own houses.

In summary, the arguer should provide more evidences to support his suggestion. Unless he gives more detailed information comparing Brookville with Deerville Acres, I am not sure that the property values in Deerhaven Acres will increase after the residents adopt their own set of restriction on landscaping and housepainting.


这几天一直在看前辈关于阿狗的分析。有所感触，今天就找了两处地方，作为例子分析了下。  这是我对于段内展开的看法 反例，一定要反动到底， 推出最后的反面结果来证明其论断是错的；有时候确实你觉得推一步就能推出来得东西没必要写，但是写出来意义上就完整了，也不费事，对吧？－－不见得是对的， 欢迎讨论^_^

zhangjing106UID：2157010

偶像的意见让人茅塞顿开啊，呵呵