ISSUE4 [奋战10G winner小组]第三次作业 [复制链接]

jin2005feng
UID：2216928

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 266
注册时间: 2006-5-23
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2007-8-6 18:47:40 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

The author claims that any field study can advance significantly only when outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. Views regarding this problem differ from person to person, which is determined by the intrinsic complexity of the problem. From a personal perspective, subject, be it plausible in some aspects, suffer from several flaws when some branches of science development is concerned.

On the one hand, some branches of science can go forward without the knowledge and experience of outsiders. There are many such examples to verify this point. A case in point is the development of physics in the early 20th century. Einstein, one of the greatest physicists in his time, proposed the famous principle in the field of microcosmic particles- the special and general relativism. This theory provided people a powerful tool to research atom. After that, he creatively put forward the new theory- photoelectric effect. As a physicist, he made a great contribution to the development of physics without involving any outside knowledge. At present, it is often seen that many papers which have great influence are developed by insiders.

On the other hand, with the rapid development of science and technology, people try to find new methods from other fields for advancement other than putting efforts on their own fields. In fact, it is verified to be an effective method. Through learning from different fields might they broaden vision and enrich their knowledge range. Through communication with scientists from outside fields, scientists might find new inspiration. For example, when some physicist introduced some theories into chemistry, a new subject-chemical physics- came into being: when chemist introduced some elemental theories into biology, the biochemistry generates. New discovery and invention might be easier to occur when different subjects crossed. Another example in point is aeronautics which origin from combination of electronic, computer, mathematics, mechanics.

In sum, the author’s contention that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study is too absolute. Learning from other fields is only one means to bring breakthrough. We should make good use of our intelligence to propel the science.

回应
0

使用道具举报

迷失的自恋者
UID：2374122

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 268
注册时间: 2007-8-2
精华: 0
帖子: 0

沙发

发表于 2007-8-6 22:41:50 |只看该作者

The author claims that any field study can advance significantly only when outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. Views regarding this problem differ from person to person, which is determined by the intrinsic complexity of the problem. From a personal perspective, subject, be it plausible in some aspects,（没看懂＝＝） suffer from several flaws when some branches of science development is concerned.

On the one hand, some branches of science can go forward without the knowledge and experience of outsiders. There are many such examples to verify this point. A case in point is the development of physics in the early 20th century. Einstein, one of the greatest physicists in his time, proposed the famous principle in the field of microcosmic particles- the special and general relativism. This theory provided people a powerful tool to research atom. After that, he creatively put forward the new theory- photoelectric effect. As a physicist, he made a great contribution to the development of physics without involving any outside knowledge. At present, it is often seen that many papers which have great influence are developed by insiders. （爱因斯坦为了相对论大学数学知识啊。。。）
相关信息：如果说，提出狭义相对论，爱因斯坦的知识还算够用的话，到广义相对论，爱因斯坦则捉襟见肘。他不得不求助于他的同学格罗斯曼。从黎曼开始发展的黎曼几何和张量分析仿佛是为广义相对论定做的工具，格罗斯曼正好是这方面的专家。
http://post.baidu.com/f?kz=70531150

On the other hand, with the rapid development of science and technology, people try to find new methods from other fields for advancement other than putting efforts on their own fields. In fact, it is verified to be an effective method. Through learning from different fields might they broaden vision and enrich their knowledge range. Through communication with scientists from outside fields, scientists might find new inspiration. For example, when some physicist introduced some theories into chemistry, a new subject-chemical physics- came into being: when chemist introduced some elemental theories into biology, the biochemistry generates. New discovery and invention might be easier to occur when different subjects crossed. Another example in point is aeronautics which origin from combination of electronic, computer, mathematics, mechanics. （这段论述真好！）

In sum, the author’s contention that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study is too absolute. Learning from other fields is only one means to bring breakthrough. We should make good use of our intelligence to propel the science.

语言论述都挺好的～就是感觉第一段最后一句比较拗口，应该是表达作者观点统领全文的吧，只是我没看懂。。。爱因斯坦的例子感觉有点绝对了。。。第二段是反对the author的，第三段是赞成的，如果把这两个段落位置换一下是不是更好。。。？个人意见～请多指教～

使用道具举报

jin2005feng
UID：2216928

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 266
注册时间: 2006-5-23
精华: 0
帖子: 0

板凳

发表于 2007-8-7 19:27:09 |只看该作者

致谢

多谢迷失的自恋者精辟的点评！

使用道具举报

sunshi
UID：2374946

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 60
注册时间: 2007-8-3
精华: 0
帖子: 2

地板

发表于 2007-8-7 19:47:13 |只看该作者

I wanner give you a suggestion.
after reaing your essay, i feel it is more like a argument.
maybe you can change your writting style a little bit.
anyway, best wishes for you!

使用道具举报