这里附上我刚刚完成的写作,从9点写到现在。真心希望各位大咖能给出表达上的错误或者难理解的地方.
ISSUE governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Outline
This recommendation seems to deduce us into believing that immediate problems are much more crucial than anticipated problems of future.Admittedly it is true that governments,as established to serve to address social problems, should focus on current problems as possible as can.However,sillily simply focusing on current problems while ignoring the anticipated problems would be eventually in jeopardy.Thus I disagree the recommendation above.
Yet I concede that the recommendation stays in a philosophy side of the problem.It is guilty for governments to shirk their vocations,especially devastating and severe emergencies.There are amount of examples where governments have necessarily to deal with urgent emergencies.In retrospect,when we get close to 2008,where a deadly epidemic plagued a large range of southeastern china and are expected to spread further-SARS(a very devastating epidemic by which anyone who was infected would be definitely dead),Chinese government quickly mobilize all possible units and forces to fight fiercely against the enemy and eventually won.And also,when we date back to 2011 of the operation for hunting for Osama Bin Laden,who was the world top dangerous head of terrorists,governments should not hesitate to take any reliable forces possible to eradicate it.As we can see in these cases aforecited to which neither anybody nor any entities are capable of addressing,it is for governments to fulfill its vocations.
Furthermore,for some conditions,it is a catastrophe to turn its back on the current problems.Any current problems should be treated seriously before it evolves into more severe and intricate,or even intractable troubles.This could be clearly seen from the case where a patient of benign tumor gradually exacerbate all the way further to be the one of terminal cancer.Since overlooking the initial phase of cancer, the tumor cells accumulate a little more and eventually deteriorate to be a large detrimental cluster of terminal cancer cells.
Notwithstanding,only sillily focusing on current problems is neither a rational nor a comprehensive approach for government due to aside from these current problems there are more predictable problems.Taking a wide stance,to some extent it is a problem of somewhat paradox to strike to a balance between current problems and anticipated problems,more former means less latter and vice versa.This is particularly evident with the cruel competition between the two largest nations in the world of 1980s. Soviet union,for example,because employed a biased strategy of dedicating to developing heavy industries and military might,by which at the end has left the crippled country where their people are suffering from their poor daily lives.And America has been swamped into the trouble of unprecedented federal budget deficits largely resulted from that government sillily devoted a great number of budget on military might construction,even now,by which American government are still suffering a lot .And ironically,most recently this suffering problem is becoming to be a current problem in spotlight for America government.Therefore sometimes neglecting anticipated problems could turn these problems to be the knotty current problems of future,ironically.
In summary,like mentioned before,current problems and anticipated problems are actually a matter of paradox.Government should be very circumvent to fully consider all the possible consequences while choosing either one of them.In my observation,it is difficult to make a distinct choice in dealing two types of problems,and there is no unrivaled advantages to take exclusively either one of them.Hence,government should take a eclectic approach to strike a balance between focusing on anticipated problems and focusing on current problems.