issue47 社会类-重视智力？超高频题哟，第一次用PP3限时成功，好激动~

flyxwUID: 106489

B2中第一次尝试用了下定义的方法，不知道用得合不合适，大家拍吧~

Society does not place enough emphasis on the intellect—that is, on reasoning and other cognitive skills.


Whether the society paid enough emphasis on the intellect, including the capabilities of reasoning and other cognitions, as the speaker assert? I fundamentally agree with the speaker's assertion.

To begin with, the emphasis paid on reasoning is too limited. Although we have learned and trained such capability from the day we came into a high school, actually, the occasions we use it in our daily life are very very rare. Take people's attitude to the so-called authorities in certain field for example. People usually regard the words and opinions of the authorities as something absolutely correct and will never fail. Few people will question the authors. Even when they have learned the capability of reasoning, which can make people to analyze and question, people who use the reasoning capability in their lives are very rare. Not only in the attitude towards the authority, but also in the attitude to the various so-called facts and the superficial phenomena of the world, people show little emphasis on reasoning. Take the large amount of appealing advertises in all kinds of media nowadays for example, few people can completely keep a cool brain and use the reasoning capability to analyze them. Most of the commons, unfortunately, can realize the truth masked under the appealing surface. For these reason, I assert that reasoning capability in fact call little attention to our society, although we actually has this capability.

While the reasoning has learned by most people, I find our society place even lower emphasis on the capability of cognitions. In my article, I define it in the field of emotion, such as the capability of cognizing beauty, the consciousness and judgement to the good and evil. In fact, most of us, including the professional educators place little attention to the cognition. From the time we grow up, our parents and educators emphasize much on the learning of knowledge such as math, languages, kinds of sciences, or specified technologies, which can help us finding a good job in the future. However, rarely we are told to learn the capabilities of cognition to the goods and evils. This also is a reason that why nowadays, many highly refined people, including the political leaders, the sports players, the singers, cannot escape from evils minds--some of them reduce to the lawbreakers, the murders, or the druggers. In fact, only with the proper judgement and consciousness can we become the true independent people. Unfortunately, the society in fact has paid little emphasis on them.

To conclude, I fundamentally agree with the speaker in that the emphasis placed on the capability of reasoning and the cognition by our society is so limited and far away from enough.

hattyUID: 141246

flyxw，看到你的jj了，不管怎么说，考过了，以前的种种都别想了。。。就要开始新的复习阶段了，come on~~

对了，22晚上特意还上来看一趟，想着怕你对那文章有讨论什么的。。。结果正好看你还在线呢~~又看你没有回文章，我心里还琢磨呢~~~这次你一定准备的挺好了 ：）

flyxwUID: 106489

倒！lake你，你，点偶的死穴了哈，偶。。这个，汗。。。虚拟。。。。。给我改过作文的XDJW最清楚。。。

lakeqianUID: 157560

if没有你们的帮助，我did not有今天
请用虚拟语气。呵呵。 :D
以后继续加油哦！！

hattyUID: 141246

发了帖子才发现是22号了。。。

快上考场了哈，我改的有点rigid了，希望不要介意~~

重要的是：补一个祝福~~~ ：）

hattyUID: 141246

Society does not place enough emphasis on the intellect—that is, on reasoning and other cognitive skills.


Whether the society paid enough emphasis on the intellect, including the capabilities of reasoning and other cognitions, as the speaker assert? I fundamentally agree with the speaker's assertion.

To begin with, the emphasis paid on reasoning is too limited. Although we have learned and trained such capability from the day we came into a high school, actually, the occasion s we use it in our daily life are very very rare. Take people's attitude to the so-called authorities in certain field for example. People usually regard the words and opinions of the authorities as something absolutely correct and will never fail. Few people will question the authors个人感觉这个用法容易有歧义，换一个，person in power什么的都可以，感觉有的词不一定非要大，非要难才好，用好了常用词很关键的。。。扯远了，flyxw用词很严谨了，尤其是限时了，很羡慕的说。。。一直没有挑出毛病来，这里就多说点了，呵呵. Even when they have learned the capability of reasoning, which can make people to 去掉to吧analyze and question, people who use the reasoning capability in their lives are very rare. 先说occasions…非常少，现在又说people非常少，但是似乎其他用语都一样，显得重复了，而且好象再说一个意思Not only in the attitude towards the authority刚才用了复数，这里最好也加上s, but also in the attitude有点多了 to the various so-called facts and the superficial phenomena of the world, people show little emphasis on reasoning.这句语法好象有问题，至少不正式 Take the large amount of appealing advertises这个不是名词形式 in all kinds of media nowadays for example, few people can completely keep a cool brain and use the reasoning capability to analyze them. Most of the commons这个词组对么？我不确定。。。天都开始亮了，有点困了, unfortunately,句子缺主语 can realize the truth masked under the appealing surface. For these reasons，复数, I assert that reasoning capability in fact calls，主谓一致 little attention to our society, although we actually has主谓一致 this capability.

While the reasoning has learned by most people, I find our society place加s，主谓一致 even lower emphasis on the capability of cognitions. In my article, I define it in the field of emotion, such as the capability of cognizing beauty, the consciousness and judgement to the good and evil. 这个我不好评论，自己不太懂得这种用法怎么样，不过，看起来很好In fact, most of us, including the professional educators place little attention to the cognition. From the time we grow这个地方要不要用过去时呢？讨论 up, our parents and educators emphasize还有这里 much on the learning of knowledge such as math加s是对的, languages, kinds of sciences, or specified technologies, which can help us finding a good job in the future. However, rarely we arewe are rarely told 似乎更好点 told to learn the capabilities of cognition to介词用to？我翻字典没有查到 the goods and evils. This also isthis is also a reason that去掉，否则是错误的 why nowadays, many highly refined people, including the political leaders, the sports players,and the singers, cannot escape from evils minds--some of them reduce to the lawbreakers, the murders, or the druggers. In fact, only with the proper judgement and consciousness can we become the true independent people. Unfortunately, the society in fact has paid little emphasis on them.

To conclude, I fundamentally agree with the speaker in that the emphasis placed on the capability of reasoning and the cognition by our society is so limited and far away from enough.

内容我没有研究过，本来想先思考一下的，无奈怕文章改不完。。。偶改文章一向是太细太慢的，一晚上不睡觉改一篇算了快的了，所以，内容和结构包括组织语言上，没有太多的发言权，flyxw见谅吧，我今昨天晚上才到作文版，看见的太晚了。。。

又想着你马上要考了，就重点改语言了，包括一些小语法和typo什么的，提个醒，多注意些，可能对考前比较有用吧，我也只能做这些了

正好楼上的几个都说的偶不懂的东东，呵呵

天已经大亮了， 全是夜里改的，头脑可能不是很清醒，说的不对的地方，欢迎讨论

hattyUID: 141246

今天晚上接的第一个 ：）

先占座，顺便up一个~~马上就考了，大家也先看看 :)

lakeqianUID: 157560

to cleonlx
capability of receiving knowledge, the capability of searching information, the capability of memorizing
这些应该都算cognitive skill认知能力。（搜索信息也是认知范畴内）

the skill of reasoning is failed to be noted in nowadays society
从结果说明社会不重视？

Failed to concern on the reasoning, we are now losing our ability of doing right judgment,
这个想法和我一样。不过我是支持的。认为人们有判断力--〉能reasoning

lakeqianUID: 157560

To begin with, the emphasis paid on reasoning is too limited.是说现在的情况吗？ assert that reasoning capability in fact call little attention to our society, although we actually has this capability.
call little attention to our society与社会重视问题是一回事吗？还有下一段开头While the reasoning has learned by most people。不太懂。似乎不扣题啊？？

This also is a reason that why nowadays, many highly refined people, including the political leaders, the sports players, the singers, cannot escape from evils minds--some of them reduce to the lawbreakers, the murders, or the druggers.你这句话的陈述使得这句话不太扣题。应该说：这些社会问题反映出我们对XXX重视不够。而不是说重视不够导致XXXX。语序不同表示意思不同。
每句话都要为论证服务。

另外，注意美国教育和中国相反。不填鸭，而是不重视数学等理科的具体能内容，重视推理等能力（所以gre的数学才会XXX）所以搬上我国现状一定要说明这是有中国特色的。

越来越rigid....

cleonlxUID: 172606

Enron Gate就是安然吧。
intellect我是自己编的……没查字典，也不知道对否，不过应该是包含这些的吧。
无意识的…………我也说不上来，只是针对MW对cognitive的定义，看出应该还有一个词代表cognitive的相对面，也就是无意识的intellect，自己推断，被动的接受能力，潜意识的记忆，应该是算无意识的？
能够judgment good and evil是因为你有价值观（不管正确与否）， 价值观是基于理性思维建立起来的，不属于情感的范畴。

仔细考虑你的建议ing。好像很有道理。准备改写。

flyxwUID: 106489

谢谢大家！那个judgment 原来我有一贯上的错误认识:)
另外to cleonlx:
emphasis ->emphasize
问：the happening of Enron Gate是什么丑闻哪？另外我觉得Iraq war牵涉到政治动机，不一定就是没有reasoning啊，你的B3是不是这个意思，也许我理解错了。其实我觉得你在B2可以说明没有reasoning会怎么样，因为题目讨论的是否enough？而不是有没有重视？试体会一下，如果reasoning没有用，即使不重视也没有错，也不存在enough了。所以我觉得B3加上去可以显得更好一些，不一定对，你再斟酌一下
总的来说不错的，特别对intellect的分析很有力，是查了字典的吧？羡慕ing,偶对好多词的理解可能还有问题呢，没有时间了。另外请教一下，其实我对intellect的介定不是很了解，你说包括有意识和无意识的？有意识的无非就是reasoning,memorizing等等了，但无意是的是什么呢
在我的B2中所说的judgment to goods and evils是有意识还是无意识的呢？你说的那是理性判断不属于emotion我好象不太懂。对cognition,我只查了一下浪文，cognition是consciousness and judgment to things...大概之类的吧，我记不得了，现在怎么觉得我定义的道德观念（是非感）好象不是intellect呢？讨论一下~


到底那些属于理性上的

cleonlxUID: 172606

to cleonlx: 几号考呢？

8.27上外

CHERRYlbyUID: 170649

我看了一下，基本上觉得不错．限时成功值得庆祝！
语言也没什么大毛病，不过好象有几个地方比如第一段的the speaker assert ,还有judgment 这个词．
不过我要是写这个题目的话可能会把emotion 这个因素也考虑进来．

祝你好运！：）

flyxwUID: 106489

to Jonsoncao ：不惨不惨，总之在考试之前写完了
to cleonlx: 几号考呢？

JonsoncaoUID: 161915

我比楼主更惨，明天考试，昨天issue才限时成功…………