- 最后登录
- 2015-11-29
- 在线时间
- 318 小时
- 寄托币
- 2309
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-7-25
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 15
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1738
- UID
- 171368
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2309
- 注册时间
- 2004-7-25
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 15
|
看好了~^_^
---题目——
Issure [Issue]17
There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.
[再罗嗦,段与段之间空一行;每段的单词顶格写!]
——正文——
As [a] matter of fact, [空格]I think the statement is twofold. [空格]one is [that] the laws could be cactorized [factorized] into two: the just or the unjust. The other is what we should is to obey the just ones and disobey the unjust ones, [空格]which is more important to the society. As for me, I tend to disaagree [disagree] with the first one fundamentally, but as for the second one, the validity should be determined on a case-by-case basis.
The primary reason why I tend to be against the first one is [based] on the history of the law. As we know, in the ancient Babylon a famous law was promulgated, which was considered as the basis of the modern laws. But this law was edited in a slavery country, [空格]so [这里都没有因果关系,把so改成and] the content is designed to serve the upper level. To many slaves, it's unjust, which robed them of the freedom, families and so forth. In fact, in the oppressed societies, the just laws seem to be incredible. [空格]Let us turn to the free society, take now [把now改成laws in modern society] as the example. When we make laws [Making the new law], the legislation administration would absorb represantative [representative] from all the classes in the society. [空格]The administration should make sure [that] the law promulguated [promulgated] is just to everyone. [空格]Sometimes only justness is not enough, even the law is demanded to make people can get profit from it. So from the sense, there can't be unjust law around us. [空格]Even the law is partial, [空格]and it will be amended soon, [空格]because we in the free society, we can freely express our ideas, [空格]also the elected government should respect what we care about.
[这段的例子编的有些出格吧。。。想想,就算现在的society是如何的free,可是上述的情况确实吹嘘得过头了吧。。。。还有,所谓的free society 改成用democratic society]
Another reason I tend to disagree with it is based on the definition of the laws. [空格]In our society everyone has his own freedom, we are object with the freedom with no constraints. [空格]Because others' freedom may mean dangourous [dangerous] to us. So a law is a balance that comes from different interests. It preserves us privilege which might be violated. So from some point [to some extent], [空格]the law is a compromising result. Unjustness doesn't exist. Of course, to the criminals, the above discussion is invalid. I think it is the exception.
[law对于criminal能用不公平来说吗?。。。。有待深究]
Admittedly, [空格]sometimes in the oppresed [oppressed] society [把这个oppressed society 改成autarchy吧], [空格]we can't resort to the legal process to alter unjustness. Because the whole justifiable thing is controled [controlled] by the ruling class. Albeit the law is unjust, we can't solve it in peace. [空格]For example, in the feudalistic society in China, Many peasants burdened heavy tax from the lord ,to the governer [governor], then to the empire. They were exploited for year by year. [空格]So the real freedom is luxury to them because no just laws existed. If they want to change the status quo, they should disobeyed [disobey] and resisted [resist] with the goverment [government]. TO them a free, democratic society is the basis for their [its] deserve right. China history is replete with such aptly exemples [examples]. [空格]Only through violence can we have the equal society.
However, we are in a democratic, equal cites. [空格]It is precious to everyone for preserving the stable society. From the above, there is no such unjust law around us. [空格]If the society does has ,we should resort to the leagal [legal] process, [空格]some forms of non violence activity are permitted. [空格]But we mustn't disobey or resisit [resist] them. [空格]These violence may cause calamity to some one else. [空格]It's entierly [entirely] that this behaviour [behavior] would threaten others' freedom. [空格]If Martin Luther King appealed to violence to solve the gap between the White. [空格]The US may fall into turmoil, [空格]the stability is to be broken. Everyone 's right got threatened. [空格]And If this violence winned, I don't think the inequality would disappear at least, even deteriorate. [空格]So I disagree with violence way to solve the unjustness. Peaceful way should be our only choice when face such unjust laws, [空格]for example, protest legally, or conduct legal process.
In sum, around us there are no such unjust laws, If only, it suggested to break such unjustness peacefully considering others' interest and the stable society[.]
[嗯,琢磨了一下作者的思路,有些明白;不过作者没能把很多想说的话表达出来;我也是为这表达的弱而苦恼啊。。然后就是例子的问题,我想就算瞎编也不要太过分了吧。。。。]
这是给你改的第二篇了,发现上一次说到的格式问题,依然不更正。。。
今晚累得要趴下了;肚子突然又痛。。。没发再细说了。。
|
|