issue110 (sally)

yangxingUID：2112368

Issue110
"When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers."

1.我们肯定历史学家在考古时肯定有些推测，而且有些时候是必要的。
2.对历史学科有创造性并不是一件坏事，有些事情我们本来就不知道我们有必要进行推测,并切合storyteller有着本质区别。
3.但是，过多的推测会让人对历史的真实性产生怀疑，况且，历史本身就是客观的，我们要认真对待，仔细推敲。
Historian, one of the mystery subjects and abstracts many ambitious youths to contribute lifetime for it. Why the history is so absorbing? In that, it has many stories and legends which the people can't experienced and acknowledged and let them seems like a founder and creator. In the history area, creative is more essential and sometimes it need us to speculate what happened at that time and who has lived here, and give us a little thread and key to the realistic history. Although, creative is needed in the history and found some new, it also request the assumption is based on the fundamental existence.


At first, I concede that, in history maybe it need much more creative than other subjects. However, in certain time the seemingly doubtful perspective is more essential. Let have a hypothesis, suppose that the group which have spend much time on searching a myeaster site, whereas, they have something which can't be interpreted by any therapy of exist in the time, should they lose it and cut the program? Absolutely not, because they have a great stride int the reach and    and have a great progress in the area. By that time, a creative idea is much more desirable and potential. Perhaps, a reasonable sddumption, could slove all the problem that hamper them and even have a milestone which chould solve the homogeneous problems. So that the vital assumption is more important to the reaserch and even advangtage to human being.


Secondly, a unique perspective is more potential for develop the history. We don't know what happened and what they did in that time and we don't have any experience to undergo the events. If we don't have reasonable hypothesis, we will have much hamper and have a hard step in history. The fatal flaw is we don't live in the past and go though the life in that time. However, we should know what happened in the past and have experienced for the pervious persons. In the argument, the reasonable perception is conceded false analyze, the arguer think the historian is a storyteller. Between the storytellers and historians have much  substantial distinction, the storyteller only tell us a story which based any reality, and the historian is based fundamental affairs and try to discover some historian events. Although they have some familiar elements, such as, they absorb many people who have great curiosity about in discovered things.


Admittedly, supposed that the assumptions are more unconvincing and not based what have existed, they must be suspected by majority. To convince numerous persons, the hypothesis must ground in the exist. In addition, history itself is objective, and we must serious about it and have a reasonable perception. We must think about all the factors which could make the hypothesis is weaken.


Above all, to have a unique perceptive is more important to a historian. We approve to have some reasonable hypothesis, whereas, must have great foundation.
写的不爽，没有例子支持好像缺点什么，很不爽。去找例子了。这种是不是就是比较难写的一类了:L:L:L

[ Last edited by yangxing on 2005-12-10 at 18:04 ]

sallyxinduUID：2131253

是的，这是比较难写的一类题目了，我都晕得很，加油，呵呵，还希望考试的时候不要遇到这种题目

Archer1123UID：206148

Issue110
"When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers."

1.我们肯定历史学家在考古时肯定有些推测，而且有些时候是必要的。
2.对历史学科有创造性并不是一件坏事，有些事情我们本来就不知道我们有必要进行推测,感觉和第一点有重复嫌疑 并切合storyteller有着本质区别。
3.但是，过多的推测会让人对历史的真实性产生怀疑，况且，历史本身就是客观的，我们要认真对待，仔细推敲。不太明白这段的主旨使说什么？:L应该多推敲还是不应该有过多推测？如果是客观的，怎么推敲也是客观的啊，不应该有什么变化吧？

Historian History, one of the mystery mysterious subjects and abstracts many ambitious youths to contribute lifetime lifetimes  for to it. Why the 删掉the (好像我自己也忘记学科前不加the了,只有特定的历史前才加the) history is so absorbing? In that, in that 好像不能位于句首 it has many stories and legends which the people can't experienced and acknowledged experience and acknowledge  and let them seems seem  like a founder and creator them 应该对应founders and creators. In the history area, creative  creativity is more essential and sometimes it need us to speculate what happened at that time and who has lived here, and give gives us a little thread and key to the realistic history. Although, creative is needed creativity is necessary  in the history and found some newfound的主语是creativity？好像有点讲不通), it also request requests  that the assumption is based on the fundamental existence.


At first, I concede that, in history maybe it history maybe  need much more creative creativity than other subjects. However, in certain time the seemingly doubtful perspective is more essential. Let have a hypothesis, suppose that the group which have spend much time on searching a myeaster site,这句的主干是suppose that the group,好像不完整  whereas, they have something which can't be interpreted by any therapy of exist in the time, should they lose it and cut the program? Absolutely not, because they have a great stride int the reach and    and have a great progress in the area. 你的意思是have made enormous strides in the research and made great progress in the area? By At that time, a creative idea is much more desirable and potential. Perhaps, a reasonable sddumption, could slove all the problem all problems that hamper them and even have a milestone have ...的主语是 sumption 吗？好像不太合适，而且一般sth is a milestone吧？which chould solve the homogeneous problems. So that the vital assumption is more important to the reaserch and even advangtage to human being. 逻辑上还可以，但是好像语言上还有待加强，长句中比较容易犯语法错误


Secondly, a unique perspective is more potential for develop the developing history. We don't know what happened and what they did in that time and we don't have any experience to undergo the events. If we don't have reasonable hypothesis, we will have much hamper be hampered and have a hard step in history. The fatal flaw is we don't live in the past and go though the life in that time. However, we should know what happened in the past and have experienced for the pervious previous  persons. In the argument, the reasonable perception is conceded 不太理解这个意思 false analyze, the arguer think thinks or considers the historian is a storyteller. Between the storytellers and historians have 个人感觉这个句子用there be句型表达好点 there are ...distinction between ... and ... much  substantial distinction, the storyteller only tell tells us a story whichis based any reality你的意思是讲故事者不是基于事实吗？但是based on any reality的意思好像是基于任何事实吧, and the historian is based fundamental affairs and try to based on fundamental affairs, historians try to discover some historian history or  historic events. Although they have some familiar elements, such as,such as 后面应该是名词性短语，不是句子 they absorb many people who have great curiosity about in discovered things.不明白最后一个句子其什么作用，好像和前面的内容有点脱节哦

Admittedly, supposed that the assumptions are more unconvincing and not based what have existed, they must be suspected by majority. To convince numerous persons, the hypothesis must ground in the existexistence. In addition, history itself is objective, and we must serious about it and have a reasonable perception.reasoanable 好像用了多次，最后换个词比较好 We must think about all the factors which could make the hypothesis is weaken weakened.


Above all, to have a unique perceptive is more important to a historian. We approve to have some reasonable hypothesis, whereas, must have great foundation.

[ Last edited by Archer1123 on 2005-12-10 at 22:40 ]

11yaoyaoUID：177037

看了一下你的作文

都有人帮助你改呀

大家的意见都很好,我楼上的板油改的很仔细

对照着自己要从新再写的,一开始要精写,反复的写几篇文章,不管是什么题,从自己分好的类里挑出来精写.自己改,别人改的意见做参考.主要最好的方法就是看素材,如果时间充足.有类似的文章网上找找读一下.把几篇折磨好了,论证模式有了.与此同时要准备你的例子,积累词汇.

写作的细节,比如语法,拼写,在平时的练习中要注意.争取这个不会被扣分.

鼓励背一点东西,比如自己写的某个句子或者某个写法经常的用到,那么就找找看，类似的说法,有没有更好的说法,就是找类似的文章和句子,然后对比修改,记住.

从第一篇到最近写的几篇,能看出来进步的说,都是从一点一点开始慢慢进步的,表急,1月23日,还有时间呢,记得那会暑假的时候，好多板油都是1个月复习就去考了,更有人两个礼拜就去考的.

一天5个小时,我觉得没有必要把练习做硬性的规定.

比如你每天写一篇I一篇A,然后做个总结,不贴上来修改也成，看看网上以前的优秀习作,自己对比着改,记得会更深,效果也更好,我以为这样的话，自己思考了.如果板油帮忙改了,自己要再动动脑子,想想道理,是自己的好，还是他们的方法好.人和人的思想不一样,不过板油改的好处就是,人多力量大,你会得到新鲜的东西.毕竟优秀习作就那么几篇,思路和语言再用就老了.

表急,自己CALM DOWN,状态好就多练习,状态不好索性休息,记得提纲一定要列,ARG没时间就列一下难题的提纲，具体的讲,难题就是你读完所有题目后,自己觉得难的,自己列,也可以拿来版上讨论.ISSUE原则上最好每类都有几个提纲,不过我的感觉是,多列是没有坏处的,不过也不要贪多,省得记不住.具体数量自己定就成了.每天列一点,最后留出两三个礼拜,复习自己的提纲,再熟悉题库,把自己的习作看看,模考.

加油!

yangxingUID：2112368

太受启发了，明天正式训练，不会让大家失望的。大家和我一起来
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... p;page=8#pid2127384
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... p;page=2#pid2127391
谢谢斑竹