看范文以后对ISSUE25的思考。

naningooUID: 2594658

ISSUE25 - "Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction-in other words, to make things as simple as possible."

central issue:Whether anyone can make things bigger and more complex.
                  Whether anyone can make things as simple as possible.
                  Whether making things as simple as possible requires real effort and courage.
                  How can one person use Real effort and courage to make things simpler?
               我认为这题是没有讲到重要性的问题的，只是讲到如何去做。。不知道大家的意见，我的互改的同学就是讲了A。高科技让生活复杂  ，B。让事情复杂化要COURAGE&EFFORTS 。C。简化对社会有好处。。
我自己是觉得有些偏题，但是我自己写的也有点偏哦，就是写得太长，我懒得改。。T-T
我的是：A。在没有某个领域的知识和经验时，人们容易让事情复杂化
B。要让事情变得简单，是需要勇气和努力的
C.。但是光有这两点不够。努力能给你有限的知识，勇气能让你接受变化，可是人类的知识是有限的，你还会把事情complex，只有lifelong learning才能让你在迷茫中再次找到出路。
D。那么一味追求简化可以吗？我认为不行，没有踩着石头过河的经验就不知道哪颗石头该踩，所以我认为让事情复杂化是学习过程中不可避免的阶段，正如量变是质变的必要前提，只有这样我们才能找到简化的办法。
因为我的角度就是lifelong learning,这个我再开头和结尾都有说。
然后告诉大家我自己的心得，开头要写什么，我觉得就是claim your position and provide the context in which you are going to talk about the issue.
再就是，同志们，帮我们看看是不是走题了。。。=_=

下面是intro里面对于范文brainstorming的指导
Sample Issue Topic
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly overrated. We need more generalists—people who can
provide broad perspectives."
Strategies for this Topic
This claim raises several related questions: What does it mean to be a generalist or a specialist, and what
value do they have for society? Does society actually need more generalists, and are specialists, in fact,
“highly overrated?”
There are several basic positions you could take on this issue: Yes, society needs more generalists and
places too high a value on specialists. No, the opposite is true. Or, it depends on various factors. Or, both
groups are important in today’s culture; neither is overvalued. Your analysis might draw examples from a
particular society or country, from one or more areas of society, or from various situations. It might focus
on the role of generalists and specialists in relation to communications, transportation, politics, information,
or technology. Any of these approaches is valid, so long as you use relevant reasons and examples to
support your position.我还是不敢全文只写一个方面或者行业哦。。大家斟酌吧
Before you stake out a position, take a few moments to reread the claim. To analyze it, consider questions
such as these:
• What are the main differences between specialists and generalists? What are the strong points of
each?
• Do these differences always hold in various professions or situations? Could there be some
specialists, for example, who also need to have very broad knowledge and general abilities to
perform their work well?
• How do generalists and specialists function in your field?
• What value do you think society places on specialists and generalists? Are specialists overvalued
in some situations, and not in others?
• Does society really need more generalists than it has? If so, what needs would they serve?
Now you can organize your thoughts into two groups:
• Reasons and examples to support the claim
• Reasons and examples to support an opposing point of view
重要，每个题目写完以后或者动笔之前，总之就是想出点思路以后，都可以回来参照这个，看看自己有没离central issue太远
If you find one view clearly more persuasive than the other, consider developing an argument from that
perspective. As you build your argument, keep in mind the other points, which you could argue against.
If both groups have compelling points, consider developing a position supporting, not the stated claim, but
a more limited or more complex claim. Then you can use reasons and examples from both sides to justify
your position.

欢迎讨论！

naningooUID: 2594658

我早上又回想了一下，觉得如果你想从定义某个词的范围或者含义来说，可以对这题目多问及个what，然后吧anyone和real那里做下文章。如果你想从某些领域某些情况来说的话，也可以。我的貌似也没走:lol

desmond_LUID: 2592840

说个我的思路：

客观上是复杂了，目的上是求简单。但要在熟练的基础，主观上不要畏难，简单化，但做起事来要深入考虑，让事情看起来简单有主题，脉络清楚，才叫本事。

1.客观世界是复杂了，同时，复杂化也不是任何人都可以做得。

2.但是，部分过程上的复杂化是为了功能，目的上的简单化，让人类生活便捷轻松。

2.虽然是这样，也并不是任何人都可以成功地简单化。beginner不能抱着简答的态度对待世界，应该 real effort and courage 的系统，深入，全面的看问题，成熟deep understanding后，才有资格 make things as simple as possible，

4. 所以真正有水平的，不是anyone可以的单纯的复杂化和简单化，是有二元的头脑，作为一种专家的方法论，分析全面，脉络清楚，使系统功能强大（复杂化），实现便利人精神生活，物质生活的终极目的（简单化）。

starter_123UID: 2576008

ls 的好提纲啊，一看就知道你是具有二元头脑的人（听起来像贬义，但偶在夸你），

starter_123UID: 2576008

为什么这么说呢？因为你的思路和我撞车了！只不过我只写了3段。

一木菩提UID: 2390164

这题可以归到比较级的思路里面。 简单化和复杂化谁更费力气？ 这是本文到底重点。

提纲中单纯的说他们的本质属性，比如简单化能怎么样，复杂化能怎么样没有真正切题；要落实到某个时刻或者某个情况下简单化比复杂化更需要费功夫 （或反过来）才有意义。