issue 36 求拍

rainystarwowUID：3157773

To fund which scientific research  is a vital issue to governments. There are widely debates about this question: some people argue that governments should fund researches whose consequences are obvious, while others maintain that governments should subsidize
researches which has underlying accomplishments. Nevertheless, in my view, based on the various circumstances a country must face and handle, the government should make a balance between funding researches whose achievements are obvious and ones whose achievements are blurry.


As science and technology are the most paramount implements in a country's development, which is the fundamental purpose of a nation, governments should fund researches such as engineering science whose consequences are distinct. A country must prefer to satisfying the basic living standard of people rather than satisfying people's spiritual life. Thus government should make sure that providing enough financing for researches which have evident accomplishments. North Korea had yet to solve the fundamental living problems people faced, but the government chose to fund the research to send satellites to the heaven whose achievements are not very clear. As the consequence of the stubborn policy, people in North Korea have lived in dramatically impoverished conditions, a impressive contrast to South Korea.


However, governments should not neglect such unclear researches as mathematics, philosophy, literacy and pedagogy. With the steady development of a country's economy and people's living standard, some researches which have no clear accomplishment become indispensable for a nation.


Mathematics is the foundation of all natural science and several social science. If a country's mathematical level is not as great as its scientific level, then the researches of natural and social science will encounter a obstruction.Countries in the world whose economic development is distinguished have outstanding mathematical level, for instance, America, Russia and France. Thus when a country's economy develops into some extent, it closely relates to the country's mathematical level.


Philosophy, literacy and pedagogy satisfy the spiritual life of people and improve people's literary accomplishment. Philosophy makes people become more rational, and literacy makes people intelligent. Pedagogy illuminate people how to make good education on their students or children. Japan tried its best to improve education level after World War Two, resulting to prompt the development of people's accomplishment and national economy.


Ultimately, after considering both sides of the issue, it must make a conclusion that governments should take various policy on funding researches in order to propel the overall development of the nation according to different circumstances the country faces.For undeveloped and developing countries, governments should prefer to fund researches which have straightforward consequences. But for developed countries, governments should fund both clear researches and blurry researches.

shinian1987UID：2797009

首先感谢LZ花时间整理排版自己的习作。

shinian1987UID：2797009

我想说说LZ的观点以及例证方面的问题。
首先LZ的立场应该是个平衡观点，没有完全倒向一边。论述的时候也是这么做的，但是LZ对unclear的理解可能有所偏差吧。从LZ的举例来看，那些惠民，与民生有关的研究就是clear的，而那些基础学科，关于人类的思想，艺术方面的研究就是unclear的，这貌似有问题。
首先看看题目：
Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
题目的意思大致就是，政府不应该赞助任何结果不清楚的科学研究。

这里的结果不清楚如何理解？而且你举的关于unclear的例子能说是unclear么？
我觉得unclear的research应该是指“双刃剑”般的科学研究吧，比如核工程，基因工程，生物病毒研究一类的。

rainystarwowUID：3157773

3# shinian1987
多谢版主的指点，这篇文章写完之后我看了下别人的提纲，发现和我的理解不同。我就想我的理解是不是有偏差了。。现在经版主的指点看来，真的是理解有偏差了。。离题了!