issue47 考虑对intellect的理解

sniper613UID：147372

Issue 47
Society does not place enough emphasis on the intellect—that is, on reasoning and other cognitive skills.
社会没有给予智力培养方面足够的重视，比如人的推理和其他认知能力。

先说你的syllabus:
总论点：同意
分论点：（智力培养的重要性----产生原因----解决方法）
1、intellect的重要性，有利于成功，Bill Gates(Bill哥的成功很大程度上不是intellect而是emotional factors)
2、因为学校教育的一些不合理，导致了缺少智力培养。考试、追求高分、高分低能现象的产生。(例子完全错误，正是学校教育追求智力培养才重视考试，而忽略了其他方面，如情商，morality,马加爵是一个典型吧，intellect很高，但是都干了些什么？)
3、解决办法，社会应该加强对这一问题的重视程度。一些公司招聘的时候重视除分数外的许多因素，加强对员工的培训等。更多的企业、学校应该学习这些成功经验。
我觉得你把intellect理解错了，intellect很大意义上是我们通常说的智商，就是逻辑思考能力。基本上是与情商相对应。所以我觉得我对这个题目会持反对立场。我把我的syllabus说一下吧：
1．        与作者说的正好相反，现在的学校很强调intellect education.
2．        但是学校忽落了Emotion education.
3．        对于morality也是很重要的一个教育方面。



As we all know, intellect, including reasoning and other cognitive skills, is an important factor in the process of individual success and social development. However, society does not pay enough attention on it, especially the somewhat unreasonable educational system.

Intellect, defined as the capacity for rational or intelligent thought, includes reasoning ability, capabilities of analyzing and solving problems, etc. It is a crucial factor in the process of not only individual success, but also the development of society. Take Bill Gates, the founder of one famous corporation in the world, as an example. If he had not owned high intellect, Microsoft under his control, would have had no opportunity to develop advanced computer operating systems and dominate the PC market triumphantly.（如上所说，Bill 开创Microsoft 是很大的勇气和很高的情商，他手下的那些编程的伙计，intellect也很高，怎么还是给Bill打工，而没有自己开公司呢？） Therefore, intellect has an important influence on the individual success. As for the development of a society, the function of intellect also could not be neglected. Social development depends on exploring more unknown fields, other than fields being existed. Discovering the unknown areas rests on the ability of reasoning, a factor included in intellect and an impetus for social development.（我反而觉得这个才能支持你的论点，But to my disappointment没有详细论述） As a result, intellect is a basic factor promoting individual success and social development.

The phenomenon that society does not place enough emphasis on the training of intellect is produced by the defect of existing educational system to some extent, such as overemphasizing on scores.（分数与智力？） Grades, standards to measure how much knowledge in textbooks being mastered by students, have many defects. For example, the capability trained in the test is the repeating of what the book says, while others, such as creative thinking and reasoning, could not be improved from this process. A consequence of these standard tests is the fact that some students, owning high scores in the school, have difficulties to fit for the job requiring them to use their cognitive skills, other tan repeating. Only if educational systems could pay more attention on the training of the development of students' whole abilities, jobs requiring more cognitive skills are easier to be taken on than ever. Then, the improvement of educational systems will bring advantages to society.（难以信服！举个例子，高等数学，几乎每个大学生都学吧，高数的考试也很多吧，分数不重要吗？但是高数显然能培养人的思考和逻辑能力吧）

The approach of solving this problem is that not only educational systems, but also whole society should begin to attach importance to the training of intellect, as doing in some successful companies and universities nowadays. Some successful companies and universities adopt many measures to overcome defects in existing school education. For example, Microsoft has a strict procedure of enrolling employees, including an elaborate designed test which could scientific evaluate various intellect levels of job-finders. Employees in this company will receive a systematic training to improve their comprehensive intellect not only reasoning, but also other cognitive skills. There is another instance about the successful pushing an approach which reduces the pressure of pursuing high scores in Chinese elementary school recent years. As a result, a survey taken by an authoritative organization shows that the general abilities have obviously increasing after carrying out the approach, and recommends other schools to adopt this approach. From these examples, we could draw a conclusion that some good ways to solve the problem of ignoring intellect could be used as references by both educational systems and the whole society.（我举一个很反动的例子，以前美国黑人选举投票之前都要通过intellect test， 通过才可以选举，你能说这是society不重视吗？）

To sum up, society should pay more attention on intellect by adopting some effective approaches immediately, since it is too important to be neglected. （557 words）

sniper613UID：147372

我觉得这个题目说的不是IQ和EQ的问题，而是说是否除了IQ外，应注重其他素质的培养，但是不一定就是EQ的

我是说IQ和EQ相对，IQ包含人的智力因数，而EQ则是非智力因数，EQ包含了你所说的其他素质的培养。

你说的考试的问题我恰恰觉得是社会学校过于重视智力教育的后果。中国高考时最典型的例子了吧

如果他没有高智商，怎么会抓住那种好的机遇呢？

Bill Gate 在八十年代创办Microsoft Company,当时他是没读完大学的，他的intellect与那些Havard的毕业生相比，谁强？但是Bill他善于把握和创造机会，可以这么说这与他的智商完全没有关系。并且你抛开其他原因就谈智商，是很难让人信服的。另外一个例子，中国很多的民营企业家，很大部分仅有小学文化，人家还不是资产上亿。如果你硬要找一个intellect的例子，我建议用科学家的例子，Einstein，堪称人类中的最高智商，成绩非凡。

sniper613UID：147372

我怎么听说爱因斯坦同学的智商比一般人高100啊

sniper613UID：147372

晕了，再想想回答你

sniper613UID：147372

题目说：社会没有给予智力培养方面足够的重视，比如人的推理和其他认知能力。我的立论是：同意题目观点，没有给予足够重视。
然后围绕这一点进行阐述，逻辑脉络就是：为什么说智力重要----为什么说社会重视不够----如何去加强重视。

至于你们所说的EQ问题，题目根本没有涉及啊？
题目就是问你，你是否认为现在社会给予IQ足够的重视
所以，我认为，如果再牵扯进来EQ的话，可能偏离的有点远。

我的观点是只要和题目里面关键词可以联系的内容都可以写啊
一般意义上讲，IQ基本上是和EQ相对的。题目说没有对IQ重视，但是也没问你如何加强重视啊？
我记得issue里面有些题是关于竞争是否有利,但是我们仍然可以联系到合作阿。
所以我觉得这道题完全可以联系到EQ上面去。
另外：我写了一篇立论和你完全相反的，不是抬杠啊，呵呵~~~~，你看看，好吗？