- 最后登录
- 2018-10-4
- 在线时间
- 382 小时
- 寄托币
- 646
- 声望
- 134
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-20
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 151
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 488
- UID
- 3603995
- 声望
- 134
- 寄托币
- 646
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-20
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 151
|
本帖最后由 tesolchina 于 2015-4-9 00:03 编辑
tesolchina 发表于 2015-4-7 20:24
你试下按这几个问题自评一下
主旨句是否充分回应题目?
老师好。。。以下是我的理解,理解不当的地方请见谅
With the globalization of education, there are increasing number of people suggest that colleges and universities should require their students to study aboard for at least one year, because they hold the view that students who study aboard will become more competitive in today’s world. (While it is true that requiring students to spend time on studying aboard could have many benefits, I believe that studying aboard sometimes will also bring some problems for a student. After elaborating these two points, I would address the argument that schools should encourage students to study aboard just depend on their personal situation.)
加括号的这一句是我想写的主旨句,模仿老师的1+3模型,题目说college should require their students at least one semester studying in a foreign country, 所以我在主旨句里面提到了应该要求和不应该求的两个方面,后来说到了学校应该以情况而定,这应该算一个复杂的观点了吧我觉得...我当时在写的时候还在想需不需要注意one year这个地方...后来觉得这里还是不好处理,就省掉了...这样做知道不太好,但一时想不出别的方法...
你这个主旨句别人看了还是不知道你想说什么 你可以考虑具体说明有什么好处和问题
而且你这样写还是会存在前后矛盾的问题 建议你看看我的分情况讨论的思路 博客51楼
这道题我之前和其他同学讨论过的 2楼有目录可以查到
To begin with, (studying aboard has many benefits.)
[这是第一段的主题句,意在回应主旨句中第一个部分,对应主题的话就是要求学生出国学习好,我想问下这里是不是直接点透应该会更好一些?就是说要求学生出国会怎么怎么样... 就是改成requiring students study aboard at least one year has many benefits.....]
On the one hand, it will enable students to know different culture in the world, which can’t be experienced in their own countries. On the other hand, it will broaden student’s eyes and enrich their knowledge, which is beneficial for their academic skills. To illustrate, Chinese college student who studies the European art will have a precious chance to fully experience it, if he or she could spend time on studying a European country. Because in China, European art major students can’t have as many chances as students in Europe to see the real masterpieces of some European artists, which makes their study more abstract.
[上面这句是解释例子如何有利的,因为中国没有太多机会领略到杰作,所以出去好]
(Consequently, requiring students study aboard will bring facilities to their learning and have positive effects on their personal development.)[以上这是我对例子的评价,说要求学生出去学习对发展和学习都有好处,好处也是支撑了Tp中的观点了吧,]
Further, requiring students study aboard will also bring many problems to both students and colleges. [第二个Tp,回应了主旨句的第二点,感觉还是应该直接说不应该require才对。。。]
First and foremost, not all students could afford the fee when they choose to study aboard. For instance, not to mention studying aboard, in China, many students even couldn’t afford their fees of studying in domestic universities even if government has already put much effort to solve their financial problems. Moreover, different countries have varieties of culture, religious beliefs and life styles, which may make students difficult to adapt to their lives. And students can’t pay attention to their studies if they can’t adapt in foreign country’s life. What’s more, if the country that student choose to study in is suffering war or natural disaster, it will be difficult for colleges to ensure their country. In such situations the disadvantages outweigh the benefits for both students and schools.[上面都是不好的例子,都在说送出去学不好的地方] For students, they can’t learn much knowledge because their personal safety can’t be ensured; for schools, sending students study outside without letting them study enough knowledge may do harm to the school’s reputations. Hence, students shouldn’t be required to study aboard from this perspective. [解释了一下为什么送出去会给学生和学校带来负面影响,因为他们不能让学生学到东西,而且不能保证学生安全,对于学校来说会对学校名誉造成损害]
Finally, it seems to me that universities should encourage students to study aboard when they could solve their financial problems and have enough social experience.[这是第三个tp,讲不应该要求,应该等情况合适了再鼓励出去] Plus, in order to let college students get better education, universities or colleges could hire famous scholars, experts from other countries as their teacher to teach students, which enable more students to have good classes at the same time. [在这里举了一个相反的例子来折中,说学校的一种替代方案]On the one hand, requiring students to have such classes not only save their money to study aboard, but also help them become well prepared for the future study life aboard. On the other hand, colleges and universities will benefit for having such famous professors in school, which will greatly enhance the school’s reputation.[通过引述例子来说明折中方案是可以的] Obviously, it’s an win-win strategy.
To sum up, while requiring students to study aboard may be beneficial for students, people shouldn’t ignore the problems it has. Thus, colleges and universities shouldn’t require all students study aboard but encourage them to study in a foreign country when the time is right.
以上就是我这篇写作的思路,现在有个疑惑的问题就是,我在看一些材料,比如5.5那本书的时候讨论第三段,有的时候说正,有时反,也有合或散的情况,这篇文章的第三段受了那个影响,但是每每写散的文章的时候都害怕自己会跑题,正好借这个机会问老师这种思路是否可取。。。
初学者,分析很多不到位的地方,请老师见谅。虽然425考,但很遗憾作文正式写有点晚。。。 |
|