寄托天下
查看: 3831|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] 机经阅读300-passage11 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
50
寄托币
30
注册时间
2021-5-17
精华
0
帖子
10
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-5-24 15:08:21 |显示全部楼层 |倒序浏览
原文:
Before feminist literary criticism emerged in the 1970s, the nineteenth-century United States writer Fanny Fern was regarded by most critics (when considered at all) as a prototype of weepy sentimentalism-a pious, insipid icon of conventional American culture. Feminist reclamations of Fern, by contrast, emphasize her nonsentimental qualities, particularly her sharply humorous social criticism. Most feminist scholars find it difficult to reconcile Fern`s sardonic social critiques with her effusive celebrations of many conventional values. Attempting to resolve this contradiction, Harris concludes that Fern employed flowery rhetoric strategically to disguise her subversive goals beneath apparent conventionality. However, Tompkins proposes an alternative view of sentimentality itself, suggesting that sentimental writing could serve radical, rather than only conservative ends by swaying readers emotionally, moving them to embrace social change.

问题:
Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply. The passage suggests which of the following about the contradiction mentioned in the highlighted sentence?
A. It was not generally addressed by critics before the 1970s.
B. It is apparent in only a small number of Ferns writings.
C. It has troubled many feminist critics who study Fern.
正确答案是AC,我不明白为什么A可以,我是觉得before 1970这个contradictation还没有被提出来,是后来的feminist说FF的sentimentality之下还有social criticism,这个social criticism和celebration for conventional stuff是冲突的。
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: 机经阅读300-passage11 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
机经阅读300-passage11
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-2443469-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部