- 最后登录
- 2011-10-16
- 在线时间
- 423 小时
- 寄托币
- 725
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2006-6-24
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 652
- UID
- 2224424
 
- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 725
- 注册时间
- 2006-6-24
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
用英文写的提纲 句子语法都不完整 只传达了意思 呵呵
Issue
13."Many of the world's lesser-known languages arebeing lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. The governments of countriesin which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages frombecoming extinct."
1)
Reasons of the extinction of languages: colonization, migration, globalization,better opportunities (Latin Americans abandon local language for Spanish)
2)
Reasons to protect endangering languages: embody unique localknowledge of culture/ study history (Egyptian hieroglyph: vanish-difficult todecipher unknown history)/ enrich cultural diversity
3)
Government serves gerentocratic interests/ not efficient: whenhampering government interests, protect it, otherwise quench it (e.g Tanzaniaabandon aboriginal language for Swahili). Suggestion: bilingualism/ languagedocumentation/ language revitalization
112."Some educational systems emphasize thedevelopment of students' capacity for reasoning and logical thinking, butstudents would benefit more from an education that also taught them to exploretheir own emotions."
1)
Reasoning/logical thinking is crucial to natural science, engineering,physics
2)
EQ is important to creative thinking (art works: Picasso/literature: Shakespeare/ music: Beethoven), moral standards, socializing(cooperation, leadership, communication)
3)
Current educational system emphasize too much on IQ, instead, theyshould focus more on EQ (EQ control feelings, ignore mental health can cause adolescentsuicides) Study shows EQ help people to be successful
4)
Both are important as development of human being
Arguement
No.39
1.
Increase in number of studentsenrolled in long-distance degree programs ≠ increase of overall enrollment (LDincrease, overall might not change or even decrease). Our aim is to increaseoverall enrollment, so not applicable.
2.
Concurrence fallacy: assumes OUlong-distance programs àdecrease in expenditures for dormitory (other reasons: more efficientmanagement strategy/spent a great deal in previous years so the decreaseoccurred).
3.
Even assuming at OU it works,might not apply to HC. Two schools are inherently different: decreasing qualityof instruction à diminish of enrollment at HC (OU:better education àincrease in overall enrollment, especially NLDP), buildings too old à increasing cost of maintaining buildings at HC. OU might becomprehensive U who can afford costs of establishing LDDP, while HC is a smallLAC who cannot afford the cost, thus further increasing the budget deficits.
4.
Suggestions: tell us overallenrollment in OU increased and it is due to LDDP/ at HC, there will be enoughstudents who r willing to take LDDP instead of regular ones.
No.119
1.
Traffic condition in W mightnot reach record levels. Increase of time to get to work could be caused byconstructing sites, or maybe it’s the raining season, so that bad weatherconditions hampered road conditions.
2.
“Post hoc, ergo proper hoc”falsely assumes that the policy àbetter travel conditions (other factors: G could have built subways or more buslines) and drop of pollution level (other factors: closed down pollutingfactories). Also, a small number of people cannot represent the situation ofthe whole city.
3.
Even assuming the policy worksin G, false analogy between two places, not necessarily work in W. Differentsituations of two cities: W could have worse road conditions than W, denserpopulation, so the policy may not work immediately or at all. Free gas couponmight make people to use cars more often on weekends, thus does not help toreduce pollution.
4.
Suggestions: give evidence toprove that increasing time to get to work is caused by too many cars on theroad, and people will indeed lessen their use of cars even with the free coupon |
|