ISSUE35 欢迎指正，花了我一个晚上加早上的时间，累啊...

lfxianshengUID: 2660057

The speaker claims that people should adhere to one’s beliefs, in every situation, in spite of whether beliefs are right or not. I strongly disagree. I concede that adherence to beliefs is a respectful quality and may result in a good consequence. However, compromise one’s beliefs is usual a better, in some situations is an inevitable, way to achieve one’s purpose.
Admittedly, adherence is a helpful quality,especially when people encounter difficulties and frustrations, which encourage them to face with and overcome blocks obstacles rather than depression. Without the belief of bringing about light to human in a cheap way by electricity, Thomas Edison would not do 1800 hundreds of failing experiments and eventually found one best metal 删除 material for bulbs. Also it is a light towel for the ones who live in a word after Nietzsche said, ： “The God has died”. Yet it may result in seriously bad consequence if someone adhere sticks to a wrong or evil belief. Adolf Hitler who waged the World War two and caused the greatest damages to the world in history,overall his life, advocated and executed his fascism theory which was illustrated embodied in his book Mein Kampf.
However Otherwise, negotiation is a course that two opposite parties try to get the equilibrium of interests and beliefs by compromises each other. For instance, between America and China, there are great differences in culture, in religious belief, in social and political system,and especially in the views of democracy, but they eventually get an agreement affiliating China with member of WTO through a marathon negotiation including from agriculture to culture industry and so forth with mutual compromises in each field. As a result, both countries enjoyed and made their interests in a greatly increasing trade scale. And for most people, existence has larger significance than other else including one’s beliefs. No people impugned Copernicus for the fact that, to avoid possible persecutions of pontiff or church, he published didn't publish work about sun center heliocentric theory after until one year before his death. In most situations, compromises, including compromising one’s beliefs, play a significant role in enlarging space and benefits for collaborators and reducing losses for oppositely competing ones who have few or even no common interests but can decrease damages bycompromise 删除. A truce will be made in the situation that belligerent countries can’t earn more benefits or just they have no energy to continue battling,regardiless of primary cause, like the outcome of each Middle East War.
Moreover, compromise doesn’t mean that one should give up beliefs forever, such as morality or laws, which people can’t violate in during common life. To be sure, there is no just reason for ones to get unjust benefits or even to commit crimes, which cause damages to others.
To sum up, adherence to beliefs seems to be respectful but compromise one’s beliefs also is necessary for harmonious cooperation.With widely various cultures, religious beliefs and so on, people from all over the world have to adapt, at least temporarily giving up some beliefs, to each other, in order to extend common and respective interests in a long term. In addition, although adherence is a compelling power driving force for success sometimes, it doesn’t mean that one should always insist since everything around is changing,especially beliefs emphasized turn out to be wrong or improper. Whether adherence’s result from adherence is harmful or beneficial, it mostly depended on the actual state and conditions.






因为是第一篇，所以实在是慢了些...好多好多的小时啊，写这个

lfxianshengUID: 2660057

The speaker claims that people should adhere to one’s beliefs, in everysituation, in spite of whether beliefs are right or not. I stronglydisagree. I concede that adherence to beliefs is a respectful qualityand may result in a good consequence. However, compromise one’s beliefsis usual a better, in some situations is an inevitable, way to achieveone’s purpose.
Admittedly, adherence is a helpful quality,especiallywhen people encounter difficulties and frustrations, which encouragethem to face with and overcome blocks obstacles ratherthan depression. Without the belief of bringing about light to human ina cheap way by electricity, Thomas Edison would not do 1800 hundreds of failing experiments and eventually found one best metal 删除 material for bulbs. Also it is a light towel for the ones who live in a word after Nietzsche said, ： “The God has died”. Yet it may result in seriously bad consequence if someone adhere sticks toa wrong or evil belief. Adolf Hitler who waged the World War two andcaused the greatest damages to the world in history,overall his life,advocated and executed his fascism theory which was illustrated embodied in his book Mein Kampf.
However Otherwise,negotiation is a course that two opposite parties try to get theequilibrium of interests and beliefs by compromises each other. Forinstance, between America and China, there are great differences inculture, in religious belief, in social and political system,andespecially in the views of democracy, but they eventually get anagreement affiliating China with member of WTO through a marathonnegotiation including from agriculture to culture industry and so forthwith mutual compromises in each field. As a result, both countriesenjoyed and made their interests in a greatly increasing trade scale.And for most people, existence has larger significance than other elseincluding one’s beliefs. No people impugned Copernicus for the factthat, to avoid possible persecutions of pontiff or church, he published didn't publish work about sun center heliocentric theory after until one year before hisdeath. In most situations, compromises, including compromising one’sbeliefs, play a significant role in enlarging space and benefits forcollaborators and reducing losses for oppositely competing ones whohave few or even no common interests but can decrease damages bycompromise 删除.A truce will be made in the situation that belligerent countries can’tearn more benefits or just they have no energy to continue battling,regardiless of primary cause, like the outcome of each Middle East War.
Moreover, compromise doesn’t mean that one should give up beliefs forever, such as morality or laws, which people can’t violate in during common life. To be sure, there is no just reason for ones to get unjust benefits or even to commit crimes, which cause damages to others.
Tosum up, adherence to beliefs seems to be respectful but compromiseone’s beliefs also is necessary for harmonious cooperation.With widely variouscultures, religious beliefs and so on, people from all over the worldhave to adapt, at least temporarily giving up some beliefs, to eachother, in order to extend common and respective interests in a longterm. In addition, although adherence is a compelling power driving forcefor success sometimes, it doesn’t mean that one should always insistsince everything around is changing,especially beliefs emphasized turnout to be wrong or improper. Whether adherence’s result from adherence is harmful or beneficial, it mostly depended on the actual state and conditions.

lfxianshengUID: 2660057

1# lfxiansheng
The speaker claims that people should adhere to one’s beliefs, in every situation, in spite of whether beliefs are right or not. I strongly disagree. I concede that adherence to beliefs is a respectful quality and may result in a good consequence. However, compromise one’s beliefs is usual a better, in some situations is an inevitable, way to achieve one’s purpose.
Admittedly, adherence is a helpful quality, especially when people encounter difficulties and frustrations, which encourage them to face with and overcome blocks rather than depression. Without the belief of bringing about light to human in a cheap way by electricity, Thomas Edison would not do 1800 failing experiments and eventually found one best metal material for bulbs. Also it is a light towel for the ones who live in a word after Nietzsche said, “The God has died”. Yet it may result in seriously bad consequence if someone adhere a wrong or evil belief. Adolf Hitler who waged the World War two and caused the greatest damages to the world in history, overall his life, advocated and executed his fascism theory which was illustrated in his book Mein Kampf.
However, negotiation is a course that two opposite parties try to get the equilibrium of interests and beliefs by compromises each other. For instance, between America and China, there are great differences in culture, in religious belief, in social and political system, and especially in the views of democracy, but they eventually get an agreement affiliating China with member of WTO through a marathon negotiation including from agriculture to culture industry and so forth with mutual compromises in each field. As a result, both countries enjoyed and made their interests in a greatly increasing trade scale. And for most people, existence has larger significance than other else including one’s beliefs. No people impugned Copernicus for the fact that, to avoid possible persecutions of pontiff or church, he published work about sun center theory after death. In most situations, compromises, including compromising one’s beliefs, play a significant role in enlarging space and benefits for collaborators and reducing losses for oppositely competing ones who have few or even no common interests but can decrease damages by compromise. A truce will be made in the situation that belligerent countries can’t earn more benefits or just they have no energy to continue battling, like the outcome of each Middle East War.
Moreover, compromise doesn’t mean that one should give up beliefs forever, such as morality or laws, which people can’t violate in common life. To be sure, there is no just reason for ones to get unjust benefits or even commit crimes, which cause damages to others.
To sum up, adherence to beliefs seems to be respectful but compromise one’s beliefs also is necessary for harmonious cooperation. With various cultures, religious beliefs and so on, people from all over the world have to adapt, at least temporarily giving up some beliefs, to each other, in order to extend common and respective interests in a long term. In addition, although adherence is a compelling power for success sometimes, it doesn’t mean that one should always insist since everything around is changing, especially beliefs emphasized turn out to be wrong or improper. Whether adherence’s result is harmful or beneficial, it mostly depended on the actual state and conditions.

windLeeUID: 2691719

那个, light towel是什么..  live in a word?

个人认为是light tower 和 live in a world ?