- 最后登录
- 2012-9-18
- 在线时间
- 60 小时
- 寄托币
- 14
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-26
- 阅读权限
- 2
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 0
- UID
- 2707837
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 14
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
本帖最后由 Donna.# 于 2009-11-18 23:02 编辑
119“When research priorities are being set for science, education, or any other area, the most important question to consider is: How many people’s lives will be improved if the results are successful?”
关键词: research priorities most important How many impove lives
总论点:在评价一个研究,不能以多少人受益为重要依据。而要看其对整个人类社会,地球环境可持续发展所做的贡献。
分论点:
1 + 在当今的社会,人类任何事业都离不开社会,都被赋予了社会价值的属性。所以研究在其根本的了解自然这一目的背后,不可避免地倾向于社会,为人类更好地生活。
例:人类基因组的测序(治疗疾病)、数学理论(为工程服务)、动物学的研究(一些疾病的仿真实验)
2- 科学本身就是难以预料的,它最终的结果和其最后所能发挥的作用都不是在近期可完全预见的,所以用多少人受益来当标尺,会片面。
例:太空探索,阿姆斯特朗登月(对很多人没有的益处,但是人类的一大步,里程碑),
战略防御攻势
3- 真正要看能否对整个地球,社会环境有积极影响。
4 不所害别人利益(待定)
The history of human beings is the struggling for better lives, definitely by varies of satisfactions, such as gorging for ancient times, spirit reconciling for medieval and so forth through hundreds of thousands years. Actually, when considering priorities of things we should do, we will depend mostly on the benefits brought from what one should do first. However, does it apply to researches about science?
As stated above, it is the human nature that enforces us to go after satisfactions for ourselves without considering other species and the whole world. We seem to seek changes in order to conduct the mere researches far more than the material live, but relating to natural essence. Unfortunately, such attempt has been failed in some degree. For example, the human genome sequencing, a tough work underwent in atom perspective, was thought of a milestone for human beings to know themselves thoroughly. Yet, that original goal has never brought to a standstill for pursuing benefits including organ reconstruction and transplantation, eliminating deficient genes behind such challenging and costly research. Similarly, researches about animals contain a large numbers of clinical pharmacology. Animals make a great contribution to human medical affairs. In fact, researches have been influenced by the society and endowed a character of benefit requirement for human beings.
Conceded that trend rooted in our mind and moral laws unconsciously cannot be discarded, it is unjustifiable for us to set priorities for science or other area mostly considering benefits how many people’s lives get form, for the research itself is unclear and hard to predict its ultimate outcomes and impacts on human beings in a short run. If so, how can we prove one benefit more people than the other? Just thinking of what the outer space exploration, which many counties fund millions of dollars deprived from taxing annually, does do for our lives improvements. Although our tax does not get paid for most outer space experiments till now, moreover, we even see less living improvement caused by these experiments, Neil Alden Armstrong’s leaping on the moon was viewed as a tremendous victory and giant pace for human endeavor on space exploration.
Finally, common sense tells me that the world contains other important elements aside from human race. After years of pollution and damage to the environment, many rare animals has been died out, which has nothing to do with wide human race on the surface, but absolutely plays an great role in the development of human beings. Therefore, researches about environment are worth conducting.
To sum up, one of the most important functions of researches is to improve most people’ lives, However, the real decision relies more on the deeply essence of the improvement and future impact on the whole race, rather than the mere fact that how many people are indeed influenced positively. |
|