Kathryn22天备考日志

zhengping001UID: 2689322

In the lecture, the professor argues that (the) moon's（大写） formation. However, this is differentfrom the reading passage, which contends that there are many differences between the moon and the earth about there formation (aboutit) 3 G  k" ?1 Z9 f4 Q
The lecture by the professor, unquestionably, casts doubts on the reading.% U8 _) U) x) n' F6 v
!d  V" C3 e/ ~) u
First of all, the speaker raises the issue that  the earth's (专用名词用大写) impact had disappeared. According to him(his statement), 4 billion years ago (there was)happened (happened) a accident, which had marked in the earth, and theearth's surface was so hot
6 H8 W& N9 B! h5 x# |2 e4 E( ]Onthe contrary, the passage rather deviating from the speaker, Demonstrate (demonstrates) that there was nothing inthe earth's surface. Therefore,this point is contradicted by what the lecture contends(中心句最好放在段落的第一句).7 C- e3 w7 ]7 e2 k0W1 U
我觉得你听出来了，但是没有表明两种观点的对立（虽然你用了很多相反或对立的词），模板词汇使用的太多了。
& U  P* B) l* y1 g+ F. C+}Moreover, the professor advocates the fact that the moon has same materials with the earth. As he mentions that it doesn't surprising aboutthe (disappearance of) water, and the waterwould be evaporate. Contrary to the belief in the lecture, the reading assertsthat the moon and the earth has (have) nothing in common. The points runs counter to the lecture contends.
) u0 I! D1 a1 b7 K6 @4 ]' @2 F- d: U0 ^5 i/ w! P6 z0 ]% D&J
Finally, the listening part states that the density of the moon is equal the moon's(应该是地球吧) surface. However, the reading passage holds the oppositeperspective, the density of the earth is more higher than the moon.1 P: P: b, x" f6 ?

1 ~: M9 t+ T1 QAll in all, thelecture conflicts with the reading passage from the three aspects which arepresented.

DriftKingUID: 2664045

慕妞 别急
慢慢来
加油

kathryn慕云UID: 2638683

17# DriftKing


猪妞也加油。。。支持你