11.2综合作文by melody

melody106UID: 2559573

The speaker contradicts the three reasons of the reading passage that the giant-impact theory is unbelievable by providing several explainations which could support the giant-impact effectively.

The speaker begins to argue that although there is no any sign of collision left for us to observe, it is not necessary that the severe hit never happened, as the reading passage states. The fact is that the accident happened pretty long time ago, more than four billion years from now. Therefore, the power of the nature would probably exert great influence on the look of the earth's surface. Actually, thousands time of collision may had taken place during the long history, but all of these marks could have been changed over time. So this point totally refutes the first reason of the reading passage.

Then the speaker goes on to point out that the water on the moon has every likelihood been heated by the unbelievable high temperature during the process of moon's formation. This rebuts the statement of the reading passage that the Moon has never been a part of the earth as the make-up of the two are so various.


Finally, the speaker challenges the validity of the last reason of the reading passage by holding that the destiny of the moon core resembling that of the earth out-layer just demonstrates the foundation of the giant-impact theory. Because the moon just comes from the surface of the earth, which attacks the third reason of the reading passage that the difference between [url=]the two destiny of the core of the moon and that of the earth [/url] show the evidence that the giant-impact theory is not true.

写得不大顺手。狠批！

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

11.2综合作文by melody

The speaker contradicts the three reasons of the reading passage that the giant-impact theory is unbelievable by providing several explainations(explanation) which could support the giant-impact effectively., N3 }7 x# W+ \) G $ C3 o4 \% l7 K0 E/ |0 } The speaker begins to argue that although there is no any sign of collision left for us to observe, it is not necessary that the severe hit never happened, as the reading passage states. The fact is that the accident happened pretty long time ago, more than four billion years from now. Therefore, the power of the nature would probably exert great influence on the look of the earth's surface. Actually, thousands time of collision may had taken place during the long history, but all of these marks could have been changed over time. So this point totally refutes the first reason of the reading passage.我昨天是第一次写综合作文，也不知道怎样是好。这段写的很细节。没有看出有啥问题。 Then the speaker goes on to point out that the water on the moon has every likelihood been heated by the unbelievable high temperature during the process of moon's formation. This rebuts the statement of the reading passage that the Moon has never been a part of the earth as the make-up of the two are so various.其实这段也把意思都说出来了，不过跟上一段对比一下就觉得单薄了点哦~~O(∩_∩)O~ Finally, the speaker challenges the validity of the last reason of the reading passage by holding that the destiny of the moon core resembling that of the earth out-layer just demonstrates the foundation of the giant-impact theory. Because the moon just comes from the surface of the earth, which attacks the third reason of the reading passage that the difference between the two destiny of the core of the moon and that of the earth show the evidence that the giant-impact theory is not true. 唉~~不好意思哈~~米有看出什么问题呢。melody姐姐是用的模板还是自己研究写的，很喜欢你这个结构啊。我偷去背啦~~嘿嘿O(∩_∩)O~

melody106UID: 2559573

哈哈，我这个是集各家模板之大成啊，不过有时候句子会写的很长，感觉太绕了，其实说清楚两者关系就好。O(∩_∩)O~ 2# 如是_ivy