ARGUMENT143 [REBORN FROM THE ASHES] TASK ONE by 小轶

domudomuUID: 2670967

Argue 143
    In this argument, the editor of the national newspaper concludes that the author of an article on corporate downsizing is misleading, based on a contradicting report cited in letter. For several reasons, the evidence offered in support of recommendation provides little credible support for it. And I find the argument unconvincing on several grounds.
    In first ground, the editorial cites a recent report on the United States economy, which found that since 1992 more jobs have been created for them have been dominated. The validity of the report is so partial. Specifically, the editor doesn’t offer the authority and some other details about the report. As to the report, which demonstrates that many of those who lost their jobs have found new employment, we still keep the suspect. What survey can lead to such a conclusion? Will the people who are investigated may be regardless of the privacy and tell the false thing? Will it be possible that they are just the group who found the jobs?
    Second, the report found that since 1992, far more jobs have been created than have been eliminated, and the demonstrated that many of those who lost their jobs have found new employment. But, the large amounts of the
    Created job may all for the low experience and knowledge such as washing, restaurant service, cleaning and so on. In this situation, a majority of work seekers are well educated and have to find some job which is skillful and make sense. To this extent, without knowing truly what the job really is, the editorial’s author can’t confidently counterplea the article’s idea. As to the report that may works have found the jobs, we will keep suspected. The word “many” is too vague to draw a clear conclusion.
    Third, the impression of the article and the report is incomparable. As article and the report may be formed in different times, so that the situation can lead to a big difference. They all talk something with different backgrounds. And lost of information in the report is not to the point of the article’s main idea. For instance, the report cites that two thirds of the newly created jobs have been in industries that tend to pay about average wages, and the majority of jobs are full time. However, the article just presents the thing that happen before finding a suitable job. So the following part of the report just proves nothing and don’t make any sense.
    To sum up, the argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it the author must provide clear evidence that essentially be opposite to the article. The author should find the evidence that most of these which job-hunters are able to find the really proper jobs have been created in 1992 and also meets the experience interest and majority of them.

domudomuUID: 2670967

今天终于在外面尖叫着下雪的时候，把我的阿狗传了上来，好吧，你们有你们的雪景，我有我的作文。让我们就都这样幸福下去吧。。。我知道这篇有不少痤的错误呢，可是有点累了哈，明早还要期中考试呢