作业贴~~~~~作文so

sosodiuUID：2731702

努力学习努力读英文。。。。。。。。。。。。。

sosodiuUID：2731702

Unrestrained and romantic, most well-known writers and musicians were known to spend their lifelong time in transferring living cities to acquire more inspiring people and things. It seems so common that the celebrity just move to another new city or country for a better development. Obviously, a new place means an exciting restart to a degree, even to many common people. So personally I would prefer to choose moving to another place rather than permanently live in a city or country.  
     One will be motivated to work hard supposing s/he moves to a totally strange environment. The feeling of being the freshman burdens one with more potential pressure, which occurs significantly to the people in all areas. A transfer student is bound to make more efforts in both academics and activities at the beginning of his/her new school life, and a new-coming businessman is supposed to keep a close eye in his market, being more concerned about his business than a local one. Under a non-familiar circumstance, a person is more likely to take all the unknown factors around his as potential enemy. Undoubtedly, those unseen stress inspire one to struggle for a better career or academics.
      Different social circumstance, which rebuilt during one’s changing living city, enables one to experience more. Many fiction writers are spending their life in transferring living cities. It is essential for those men who earn livings through writing attractive and creative stories to keep looking for inspiration from socializing with people of distinguished cultural backgrounds. The new social circumstance may also cover that unhappy memory one suffered in former city or country s/he lived in.
     Moving to another place does have several drawbacks, for instance, the inconvenience caused by not familiar with the local living information occurs. As for me, the solution is trying to take part in more parties of communities and clubs. Using the searching tool on internet is also supposed to be helpful.
     Although hometowns are of an irreplaceable importance in everyone’s life, changing living place is still a more beneficial choice, comparing to keeping a permanent live in a city/country.  Moving to another place is a both inspiring and exciting experience.

sosodiuUID：2731702

12.02        望拍~~~~~~~~~

It is more fun to see a movie in the cinema with other people than see a movie at home. 6 k

Are you the same as me, always having a number of movies that being the last things I want to miss? But just like the old adage says “Enough is as good as a feast”, watching a film in cinema always seems to be beset of difficulties, made in part by objective factors such as financial problems, lack of time and so on. Although the truth is watching the same film on television or DVD is more viable and cheaper, I still prefer to buy a ticket to go to cinema.
It is undoubtedly that both vision effects and sound effects are beyond comparison in a cinema rather than your TV screen. For instance, many Hollywood movies just cost tremendous amount of money pursuing a perfect vision effects, adding lots of multi-media. One probably is not able to enjoy those high-technique factors limited by the facility at home. Missing the most exciting moment in an expecting movie, I guess it is a pitiful thing that a person never wants to occur.
Seeing a movie with other people in the cinema is also a social experience, reasoning that one can interact with others and share some opinions. In contrary you can only get nothing but your own breath when you are sitting in front of a television. People love to give thoughts when they finish a two hours’ clipping, including comments toward actors and plots. Undoubtedly, cinema just offers a place for audience to share interests together.
People who prefer to choose stay at home watching a film may argue that it is more convenient to enjoy it oneself, for one can press pause bottom whenever s/he wants. Considering a movie is like a journey in term to director’s instruction, it is more enjoyable and amazing supposing a person fulfill the whole clipping as designed, to follow the plot and emotional line.  
In conclusion, seeing a live movie is a better choice for both its live effects, audience’s interactions. Buy a ticket of the movie in your must-watch list, just add some fresh to the current life.

michael_beyondUID：2704216

Are you the same as me, always having a number of movies that being the last things I want to miss? But just like the old adage says “Enough is as good as a feast”, watching a film in cinema always seems to be beset (beset是动词吧，他有名词用法吗)of difficulties, made in part by objective factors such as financial problems, lack of time and so on. Although the truth is watching the same film on television or DVD is more viable and cheaper, I still prefer to buy a ticket to go to cinema.$ M) y0 l5 |* U
It is undoubtedly （是undoubted哦）that both vision effects and sound effects are beyond comparison in a cinema rather than your TV screen这个该写at home吧与前面的in a cinema对应吧. For instance, many Hollywood movies just cost tremendous amount of money pursuing a perfect vision effects, adding lots of multi-media. One probably is not able to enjoy those high-technique factors limited by the facility at home. Missing the most exciting moment in an expecting movie, I guess it is a pitiful thing that a person never wants to occur.
# W. ]' W! Y3 A0 X, DSeeing a movie with other people in the cinema is also a social experience, reasoning that one can interact with others and share some opinions. In contrary you can only get nothing but your own breath when you are sitting in front of a television. People love to give thoughts when they finish a two hours’ clipping, including comments toward actors and plots. Undoubtedly, cinema just offers a place for audience to share interests together.# K5 w: N* C  k' y8 f
People who prefer to choose stay at home watching a film may argue that it is more convenient to enjoy it oneself, for one can press pause bottom whenever s/he wants. Considering a movie is like a journey in term to director’s instruction, it is more enjoyable and amazing supposing （to suppose）a person fulfill the whole clipping as designed, to follow the plot and emotional line.  
9 N. b0 E1 u5 bIn conclusion, seeing a live movie is a better choice for both its live effects, audience’s interactions. Buy a ticket of the movie in your must-watch list, just add some fresh(fresh 是形容词吧) to the current life.
从你的作文可以看出你总体的英文功底很强，比我强多了，作文写得挺好，而且分析的挺全面，你说你不能控制自己写作时间，我建议你掐表写作文，到了三十分钟你就停笔

sosodiuUID：2731702

12.8   printed book have had greater effects on society than television has？
这一次掐表了。。。但还是超~~~~~~

If you ever have a chance to immerse yourself in a college library for a full weekend, you must be impressed by this amazing experience of spending time with immeasurable amount of printed books. What is the pity? The people nowadays seem seldom spend weekends or spare time in this way, choosing a more relax kill-time entertainment--Television programs. It is surprising to see a new media can be spread so quicklly that almost beat the old ones, sneaking into people's life so deeply. But i still hold a positive view toward the significance of our historical media method-printed book, reasoning that it always stand an irreplaceable state in human-beings' civilization.
Undoubtedly, printed book has a longer history, which contributes to a more perfect and amplest system of knowledge. As everyone knows it, as a new media controled by the editors and certain people, televison is not an efficient and effective way to reinfore one's wisdom and knowledge. But everyone can access the printed books and choose the needed one for himself/herself. The system of information built by the printed books are wider and more optional than the TV programs. For example, supposing a student is doing his research about a certain subject, the first way to gain the resource mostly would be the printed books in the library, especially some historic references. It is no possibility for him to sit in the coach to wait for the topic he is doing before the TV set.
Printed book has another important feature-the potential collective proper. Even today, with the rapid development of so many new media, the book basing on a permanent subtle is still of its cultural market is never gona to change. Have you ever considered this question, where are the information and resourses of the history on Internet or the TV program came from. No surprising, from the printed books, for its uniqueness of recording the history and the wisdom of ancient people. In addition, the feature of collection of the printed book is also of its pros even to today's cultural market. It is easy to find the materials in books about 100 years ago, when the television first invented, while the film materials of TV show at that time are certainly difficult to be kept.
Some supporters of the television, or this digital media now, would probably say television is more educational and at same time entertaining than the printed book. But just because of the moving images and constant information it is providing, it seems no time for the audience to make their response, not mention to think oneself. It seems more reasonable to call this process "receiving information" rather than "obtain knowledge" .
The new media such as television are really familiar to people in this modern society, and with their great efforts in adding the fresh to our new life, the culture and tough topics seem more accessable to folks. But the new ones are still not comparable to the printed book, the one conveys the wisdom of ancient people and the real heritage of whole civilizations, has no doubt had greater effcts on society.

shirley072UID：2712200

If you ever have a chance toimmerse yourself in a college library for a full weekend, you must be impressedby this amazing experience of spending time with immeasurable amount of printedbooks. What is the pity? (这句话放在这里有点突兀，可以放在后面一点吧) The people nowadays seem seldom spend weekends or spare time inthis way, choosing a more relax kill-time entertainment--Television programs.It is surprising to see a new media can be spread so quicklly that almost beatthe old ones, sneaking into people's life so deeply. But i still hold apositive view toward the significance of our historical media method
(应该没错，但给我感觉这种组合很别扭) -printed book, reasoning that italways stand an irreplaceable state in human-beings' civilization.) H1 _& u, c# c' e
Undoubtedly, printed book has alonger history, which contributes to
(我觉得这个短语不恰当，一般理解为贡献，有作用的意思吧 contribute to a system? 我觉得还不如用set up建立系统之类的 ) a more perfect and amplest systemof knowledge. As everyone knows it, as a new media controled by the editors andcertain people, televison is not an efficient and effective way to reinforeone's wisdom and knowledge. But everyone can access the printed books andchoose the needed one for himself/herself. The system of information built bythe printed books are (is) wider and moreoptional than the TV programs. For example, supposing a student is doing hisresearch about a certain subject, the first way to gain the resource mostlywould be the printed books in the library, especially some historic references.It is no possibility for him to sit in the coach to wait for the topic he isdoing
(related) before the TV set." _' l5 @5 {4 E: G
Printed book has another importantfeature-the potential collective proper
(适合的，形容词？). Even today, with the rapid development of so many new media,the book basing on a permanent subtle (又是形容词？) is still of its cultural market is never gona to change (这句话为啥有两个is呢，没有读懂). Have you ever considered thisquestion, where are the information and resourses of the history on Internet orthe TV program came from. No surprising, from the printed books, for itsuniqueness of recording the history and the wisdom of ancient people. Inaddition, the feature of collection of the printed book is also of its proseven to today's cultural market. It is easy to find the materials in booksabout 100 years ago, when the television first invented, while the filmmaterials of TV show at that time are certainly difficult to be kept.
Some supporters of the television,or this digital media now, would probably say television is more educationaland at same time entertaining than the printed book. But just because of themoving images and constant information it is providing, (这里前后衔接得不是很顺畅) it seems no time for the audienceto make their response, not mention to think oneself. It seems more reasonableto call this process "receiving information" rather than "obtainknowledge" .- u( ?2 O* i- g! n, X! m
The new media such as televisionare really familiar to people in this modern society, and with their greatefforts in adding the fresh to our new life, the culture and tough topics seemmore accessable to folks. But the new ones are still not comparable to theprinted book, the one conveys the wisdom of ancient people and the realheritage of whole civilizations, has no doubt had greater effcts on society.


拼写错误没改
总的来说我觉得楼主的句子很流畅，就是个别的短语，句子之间的承接以及精确的用词要稍微留意一下
还有一个文章的题目主要是论述哪个对社会的影响比较大，而不能仅仅在信息量上面做比较，要从信息量过度到对社会的影响，所以我觉得有时不太切题，特别是最后一个论点说tv过得太快我们来不及反应，我觉得这个跟与社会的关系不相关呢
个人意见啦~~~~

素怿UID：2630430

If you ever have a chance to immerse yourself in a college library for a full weekend, you must be impressed by this amazing experience of spending time with immeasurable amount of printed books. What is the pity? The people nowadays seem seldom spend weekends or spare time in this way, choosing a more relax kill-time entertainment--Television programs. It is surprising to see a new media can be spread so quickly that almost beat the old ones, sneaking into people's life so deeply. But i still hold a positive view toward the significance of our historical media method-printed book, reasoning that it always stand an irreplaceable state in human-beings' civilization.
. `! z6 ~# G; b* m3 R) wUndoubtedly, printed book has a longer history, which contributes to a more perfect and amplest system of knowledge. As everyone knows it, as a new media controlled by the editors and certain people, television is not an efficient and effective way to reinforce one's wisdom and knowledge. But everyone can access the printed books and choose the needed one for himself/herself. The system of information that（主语从句that不能省） built by the printed books are wider and more optional than the TV programs. For example, supposing a student is doing his research about a certain subject, the first way to gain the resource mostly would be the printed books in the library, especially some historic references. It is no possibility for him to sit in the coach to wait for the topic he is doing before the TV set.
8 f0 E) c2 W% f. fPrinted book has another important feature-the potential collective proper（三个形容词？感觉有点奇怪，不用-，直接写成从句就可以三个形容词连用了吧）. Even today, with the rapid development of so many new media, the book basing on a permanent subtle is still of its cultural market is never gona（这个词是？） to change. Have you ever considered this question, where are the information and resources of the history on Internet or the TV program came from. No surprising, from the printed books, for its uniqueness of recording the history and the wisdom of ancient people. In addition, the feature of collection of the printed book is also of its pros even to today's cultural market. It is easy to find the materials in books about 100 years ago, when the television first invented, while the film materials of TV show at that time are certainly difficult to be kept. ( u/ [  d% Q- U9 {
Some supporters of the television, or this digital media now, would probably say television is more educational and at same time entertaining than the printed book. But just because of the moving images and constant information it is providing, it seems no time for the audience to make their response, not mention to think oneself. It seems more reasonable to call this process "receiving information" rather than "obtain knowledge" .
7 S7 `6 j& Z3 N* PThe new media such as television are really familiar to people in this modern society, and with their great efforts in adding the fresh to our new life, the culture and tough topics seem more accessible to folks. But the new ones are still not comparable to the printed book, the one conveys the wisdom of ancient people and the real heritage of whole civilizations, has no doubt had greater effects on society.

楼主的语言驾驭能力比我好，所以没看出啥问题来~~~~不过楼上Shirley提的不是很切题问题有点道理，我自己写的那篇也有这个问题~~~~~
Ps：你写得好长啊~~~所以超时了，嘿嘿~~~

sosodiuUID：2731702

6# shirley072

其实最后一个论点我是从反面写的。 实在想不到正面的。我说的是电视可以更加有效并且愉悦的把信息传达给观众，但是正因为它的这一点，观众被动接收大量愉悦信息，就更懒于去做出反应，更不用说思考。 并不是说电视太快人们来不及反应。

sosodiuUID：2731702

12.11  更真实的新闻从哪来~


It seems undoubted that the mass media has sneaked into every single individual's life, completely with commonly recognized. But since more and more editoral scandals have taken place all around the world, it is not surprising to see an increasing number of conscious folks begin to hold a doubtable view toward these who hold the key of public speaking and somehow the truth. When it comes to the option between the newpaper and the television as a more reliable method to receive the news, personally, I tend to support the one with a longer history-newspaper.
The newspaper, wherever and whenever, gains support from the certain key group of readers, which means the market of local or global publish newspaper has less competetion than the market of television programs. It is a common knowledge that one can receives hundreds of news program in one TV set, but only a little range of local newspapers are available. In order to attract more attention from the audience, TV shows have to put more energy to be particular and entertaining, sometimes will lead to some unconscious social and entertainment news.
   Apparently, in contrast to the digital signal, the media of newspaper is based on the paper, which is safer and stable in some special period. It is common sense that only newspaper is the main method for folks to get the news during the war. In this point, television get its most serious weakness that digital signal is unstable even with today’s technique. For instance, when disasters happen, such as earthquake and strong typhoon, the signal of television is easy to be cut off, so the people in certain area almost can not get any news about the emergence and rescue from television. In addition, digital signal can also be controled by territories sometimes, the consequences of which are all huge and pitiful.
   Mass media does add more fresh to our daily life, also being the key orientation when the society is faced with disaster and war. Although the people nowadays have spent more time with the television, put my feeling into words, it's safe to say that the newspaper provides more reliable sources of news.

bixueer111UID：2697942

啊，今天忙的太晚了，我今天晚上再一起学习哈~~嘿嘿，先去睡觉先~脑子晕了~
by the way,谢谢你的评价~嘿嘿~ 偶要upup ~~

bixueer111UID：2697942

It seems undoubted that the mass media has sneaked into every single individual's life, completely with commonly recognized.（嘿嘿，我没见过这个表达诶~如果你是学习别人的话，偶也学下~看起来很不错） But since more and more editorial scandals have taken place all around the world, it is not surprising to see an increasing number of conscious folks begin to hold a doubtable view toward these who hold the key of public speaking and somehow the truth. When it comes to the option between the newspaper and the television as a more reliable method to receive the news, personally, I tend to support the one with a longer history-newspaper.. e第一段很好诶$ c+ O6 ^, z$ J% b1
|# I
The newspaper, wherever and whenever, gains support from the certain key group of readers, which means the market of local or global publish newspaper has less competition than the market of television programs. It is a common knowledge that one can receives hundreds of news program in one TV set, but only a little range of local newspapers are available. In order to attract more attention from the audience, TV shows have to put more energy to be particular and entertaining, sometimes will lead to some unconscious social and entertainment news. - @1 ^3 l4 X2 \& g3 g2 D( X) b6 D+ _
最好能举个例子啦~                     

Apparently, in contrast to the digital signal, the media of newspaper is based on the paper, which is safer and more stable in some special period. It is common sense that only newspaper is the main method for folks to get the news during the war. In this point, television gets its most serious weakness that digital signal is unstable even with today’s technique. For instance, when disasters happen, such as earthquake and strong typhoon, the signal of television is easy to be cut off, so the people in certain area almost can not get any news about the emergence and rescue from television. In addition, digital signal can also be (easily) controlled by territories sometimes, the consequences of which are all huge and pitiful.(小意见：which lead to huge and pathetic results)
感觉这个段写的有点乱，说特殊时期，你说了war,但是后面例子是earthquake and typhoon.
   Mass media does add more fresh (+air小意见) to our daily life, also being the key orientation when the society is faced（ 可以直接faced吧？）with disaster and war. Although the people nowadays have spent more time with the television, put my feeling into words, it's safe to say that the newspaper provides more reliable sources of news.

啊，sorry这么晚，我只有晚上有时间，作文方面我很弱的~~嘿嘿，所以上面都是我个人意见，有什么你肯定对的一定要告诉我啊~~向你学习~~~加油~~soso

yuminjiaUID：2659628

9# sosodiu

12.11  更真实的新闻从哪来~
5 s, W2 `" S/ H: h. W2 W' l
8 h) `0 I- _* ]5 `. [
# f3 H' j6 J) K; G$ e2 {It seems undoubted that the mass media has sneaked into every single individual's life, completely with commonly recognized？. But since more and more editorial scandals have taken place all around the world, it is not surprising to see an increasing number of conscious folks begin to hold a doubtable view toward these who hold the key of public speaking and somehow the truth. When it comes to the option between the newspaper and the television as a more reliable method to receive the news, personally, I tend to support the one with a longer history-newspaper.9 V7 F
) S$ Q& e
The newspaper, wherever and whenever, gains support from the certain key group of readers, which means the local or global market publishing newspaper has less competition than the market of television programs. It is a common knowledge that one can receives hundreds of news program in one TV set, but only a little range of local newspapers are available. In order to attract more attention from the audience, TV shows have to put more energy (花更多的心血，这么说好象不太好)to be particular and entertaining, sometimes will lead to some unconscious social and entertainment news.

# Z0 Y. K$ ?# Q& _) b% n   Apparently, in contrast to the digital signal, the media of newspaper is based on the paper, which is safer and stable in some special period. It is common sense that only newspaper is the main method for folks to get the news during the war. In this point, television get its most serious weakness that digital signal is unstable even with today’s technique. For instance, when disasters happen, such as earthquake or strong typhoon, the signal of television is easy to be cut off, so the people in certain area almost cannot get any news about the emergence and rescue from television. In addition, digital signal can also be controlled by territories sometimes, the consequences of which are all huge and pitiful.

0 h! H$ V/ V& j1 W9 }   Mass media does add more fresh to our daily life, also being (这个being 在这里是什么用法，分词表伴随状态？好象不太好吧)the key orientation when the society is faced with disaster and war. Although the people nowadays have spent more time with the television, put my feeling into words, it's safe to say that the newspaper provides more reliable sources of news.

改迟了 抱歉.
我觉得第2段写的比较乱,论述有点多,还是写点例子来论证比较生动;第3段写的不错.

sosodiuUID：2731702

12.19  T13

The reading and the lecture both center on the topic of today's literature and whether this decline in literature reading is normal or not. The reading passage presents the conservative point of view of this trend. Conservatively, this trend was undoubtedly a bad sign for reading public, culture and development of the literature. This idea was not based on much analysis of the changing cultural environment. Rather, it was based on an assumption that the role and merits of literature are unassailable. The reading also denied the positive aspects of other culture forms such as movies, music, science fictions, political analyses and so forth, which were quite prevailing nowadays. In addition, this viewpoint attributed the fact that author in the literatural area got few support and lead a hard status to the so-called poor-standards of readers.   

The lecture presents a different side of the decline. According to the speaker, we can still hold a positive view towards this apparent decline in literature reading. The belief is based on several quintessential analyses of the new fashion of culture. First, those classifications of books which prevails at present were of creativities and imaginary, that is to say, the reader could also be benefited from those best sellers other than literature. Second, the new forms of culture sprung up these years were of their irreplaceable significance in improving the level of culture. Finally, aiming to be particular, some literature author had written lots of works that isolated from reader's understanding, which indirectly led to the poor-condition of this area.   


第一次写综合~超时了~句子全模板~

sosodiuUID：2731702

T3  12.30  


The reading passage and the lecture both centered on the Rembrandt's painting and whether an individual work called Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White bonnet was belonged to him. The reading material presents a historical point of view of this question, which was supported in the 1930s. It was turned out to be denied from the evidence found later. Historically, only from this paint itself, there was a vital failure in detail that the woman's accesory was not in accord with her dressing, which was obviously against the former style known as Rembrandt. The passage also mentioned another huge mistake of this work that the light and shadow undoubtedly could not be drew by an expert such as Rembrandt. In addition, the material points to the fact that this particular painting was not similar to rest pieces of Rembrandt's works.
   The lecture presents a relatively new found of this portrait. According to the speaker, basing on several facts, the paint is indeed by Rembrandt. The reason that it is not like other paintings of him is this work had ever been recreated after about 100 years. Three facts are demonstrated in the speaking. Firstly, evidence showed the fur collar was added later by someone else, to make the woman in portrait more close to the character of format portrait.  Second, some original part of a more light color collar was removed, which disrupt the former consistent in light and shadow. Finally, certainly, the later enlarging in whole size of the painting, which aimed to make it more grand and valuable, led to the glued wood material of this work it now presents. However, the former material of this painting is wood panels, the origin painter still points to the Rembrandt.

sosodiuUID：2731702

作文：
1.19 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.


Children have been asked about our dreams and habits since we were in a young age, however, never been told that future would not always be bright like the noontime sunshine, and this is the real life. Tough and even sometimes afflicting, life is mixed with so much experience and thoughts people have no idea until make the trials. It is no doubt that the reality also goes against people's expects. Through these unexpected life stories, one can find many special and unexploited aspects in his own personalities and characteristics.
   Pushing oneself to adapt to a new environment, an unexpected disaster, even a fresh job, one can teach himself several treasure things and burden the understanding of the world, even if the original orientation is not from his wish directly. There are many old stories are saying that some of our ancestors were moving to the new land constantly, driven by the changes taking place in the nature. They explored more and more areas and lands all over the world, reasoning that the gradual worsen environment pushed them to leave the homes and tribals. Without their forced moving, the world today is never the one it looks nowadays.
   Through forcing oneself to do the things himself or herself do not like, one can burden himself/herself a sense of responsibilities. Undoubtedly, every single of man is making their best to meet their social obligation, such as some compulsory policies and family pressure. They may just accept something out of their own hope, but through these works and trials, one gains his social value and the experience benefits others, especially the families and friends.
   It is not a easy task to make sacrifice of one's own thoughts to do something for others and the society. Just as the famous saying goes, no pain, no gain, people learn many influential ideas and gain a mass of life experience in the process. Paying a price in the growth period, we are improving ourselves and qualifying for the further challenges.