- 最后登录
- 2014-4-20
- 在线时间
- 103 小时
- 寄托币
- 184
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2009-9-26
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 134
- UID
- 2703591

- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 184
- 注册时间
- 2009-9-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2009-12-2 13:05:13
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 日月之首0203 于 2009-12-2 13:06 编辑
题目3. The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis.
事实①"In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years, whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small, general practice firms. 解释(②Even though large firms usually offer much higher salaries, law school graduates are choosing to work for the smaller firms most likely because they experience greater job satisfaction at smaller firms. ③In a survey of first-year students at a leading law school, most greed with the statement that earning a high salary was less important to them than job satisfaction)结论④This finding suggests that the large, corporate firms of Megalopolis will need to offer graduates more benefits and incentives and reduce the number of hours they must work."
在Megalopolis,过去三年间在大型合伙事务所就职的法学院毕业生数量下降了15%,而在小型,一般性事务所就职的毕业生数量则在增加。尽管大型事务所通常提供高的多的薪水,法学院毕业生选择在小型事务所工作主要是因为他们感受到更高的工作满足感。一项对于顶尖法学院一年级学生的调查显示,多数人同意挣更多的钱没有工作满足感更重要的说法。这一现象启示我们,Megalopolis的大型合伙事务所应该给毕业生提供更多的福利和激励,并减少他们的工作时间。
1.需求是必要条件,大公司未必需要更多员工In the last few years, it’s possible that many graduates' entrance to large firms cause its demand accesses to complete. Hence, there are less working opportunities in those firms. If there is no vacant position, how to increase number of graduates at large firms? As a result, demand is a fundamental factor. An objective discipline that graduates feel less job satisfaction because of drastically competition exists. Therefore, large firms don’t necessarily require more employees, let alone provide better benefits and working hours.
2.下降原因有个人有企业The condition of different employment in two kinds of firms doesn't represent graduates like working at small, general practice firms more. Large, corporate firms might have higher requirement—capability of bearing complicated working environment and intense competition--which graduates can't reach. What’s more, there are some objective elements, for instance, large firms are going to lay off employees. On the other hand, graduates may have some individual problems to considerate when they choose a firm. So the duty doesn’t rely on large firms.
3.survey问题,对象不对The survey isn't a persuasive evidence to demonstrate graduates' preference, since we don't know what style of this survey adopting. Besides, it just stands for first-year students, who are totally different with graduates and not representative. They have less professional knowledge, immature thought, less living pressure. Last but not least thing is they aren’t encounter with finding a job now. A few years later, they may change their opinions. The really worth being invested person should be graduates.
4.何谓满意度,大小公司各有优势What’s the definition of job satisfaction? Higher salary, more opportunities and working environment are included except benefit, incentives and fewer working hours. Consequently, large firms don't requisitely have worse job satisfaction. Both firms have their respectful advantage. Graduates choose small may attribute to its leisure surroundings, taking heavy burden earlier and communicating with boss easier, rather than benefits and incentives. Large firms may have better benefits and incentives than small firms. Besides, large firms’ materials, spirits and values are merit being learned. However, merely one aspect to improve job satisfaction can’t attract graduates
5. This simply happened on law school graduates.
6.绝对数字不说明问题Apparently, graduates working for large firms decline by 15percent whereas an increasing number of graduates work for small ones. Nevertheless, rather than compare absolute numbers, we should contrast employment rates in two kinds of firms.
存在问题:看到别人分析说除主观因素,还有可能是其他因素导致,如失业率增加。假如失业率增加正确,那么小企业就不会存在这种问题吗? |
|