Choices are made between historical buildings and new skyscrapers, controversies over how Internet and parents are competing for youngsters' attention and debates about whether knowledge or skills should be the priority of school curriculum. These real life scenarios echoed with the assertion that tradition and modernization are incompatible and we did have to make choice. Like many dichotomies, however, this one is an oversimplification. Out of discrepancy and contradictions, their underlying alignments and complementariness enable us to come up with a balanced solution rather than a false dilemma.
Alignment between tradition and modernization arises from the nature of social development. Social development, as well as human development, is an upward spiral, historically interconnected. By modernization, we do not mean an isolated and clear-cut stage of development. Rather, it constitutes one period in the continuum of history, connecting with other point along the line. One particular previous point is what known as tradition. Beneath the changing face of modernization, adherence to at least certain essentialities of tradition can be identified in real life scenario. Education, for example, is one arena where the older generation transfers what they want to preserve to the younger generation. In terms of curriculum, there is remarkable uniformity across time and countries: Language, mathematics, philosophy, art, music and physical education are a variant of classic subjects when Ancient Greek first invented formal education.
Education is being modernized through assorted ways and trends like privitation and vocationalism are causing continuous debates between essentialists and progressive educators. It did not have a telling effect in curriculum that is taught in classroom. Tradition always has one way or another to perpetuate its beliefs, customs and practices in the progressive movement of modernization.
Even being aware the nature alignment, conservatives and liberals are unlikely to end their debates, where conservatives accuse modernization of degenerating valued tradition; liberals blame tradition for bonding creativity. Admittedly, both sides gain their ground with factual events and reasonable predictions. Nevertheless, these differences are not necessarily to be identified as conflict. Perceived complementariness, I propose, would allow space for negotiation to alleviate controversial issues. Powerful technologies can help preserve and promote tradition while traditional value system can keep the development of modernization in check. In recent years, there appears increasing dispute between the sweeping effect of globalization, which is a critical component of modernization, and developed its byproduct culture hegemony. Indigenous culture is reported as gradually fading when they want to involve themselves in the global community. If we look another side of the story, we might find how we even firstly are aware of a different culture is through the benefits of modernization. In this sense, any information technology can be a tool for different tradition keeper to preserve and promote their unique tradition. Channels like Discovery documented and broadcasted numerous exotic cultures which we may never get to know. On another side, the expansion of modernization sometimes can be scary if we do not take long-valued morality into consideration. Cutting-edge technologies like stem-cell research, nuclear weapon and human cloning could lead to unwanted even catastrophic consequences. As a result, a traditional and widely-shared value system can help people minimize the negative side-effects when we enjoy the convenience and prosperity brought by modernization.
The pendulum between tradition and modernization will never stop swing. It did not mean, however, that we always have to make a choice between them. As discussed above, their complementariness enables us to have a balanced solution towards particular problem. Hopefully, with this optimistic perception in mind, we could have more programs like "Technology for humanity" to satisfy both conservatives and liberals.