综合写作 －－T5 大猫猫

morning8427UID: 2725373

The lecture completely refutes the passage. It is said in the lecture that the stone buildings cannot be used for residential, maizestorage or ceremonial. This contradicts what the passage indicates.
First of all, the lecture insists that the stone buildings cannot be used for residential. Although the outside of building looks like af amily house, the insides of buildings do not have enough fire spaces to meet hundreds of people to cook with. The inside of largest building just has fire spaces to meet 10 families. This is very different from the passage says tha tstone houses are used for residential.
Furthermore, the building cannot be used for storage. The lecture said that there were even no containers in the building for maizestorage. The people cannot put the maize on the floor. On the contrary, the passage contends that the building is used for store food supplies, such as maize.
Finally, the lecture points out that some construction materials are found near the building, which prove that it may not used for ceremonial. The materials, such as sand, stone and construction tools, provethat these buildings may use for construction. Also the pots can be interpreted as construction workers prepare for meals. However, the passage always thinks that the building is used for ceremonial.
In a word, the viewpoints asserted in the lecture aretotally different from what the passage indicates.

饕餮丫UID: 2575059

The lecture completely refutes the passage. It is said in the lecture that the stone buildings cannot be used for residential, maizestorage or ceremonial. This contradicts what the passage indicates.7 J0 W5 _! o9 n7 L1 m0 x" a0 L
First of all, the lecture insists that the stone buildings cannot be used for residential. Although the outside of building looks like af amily house, the insides of buildings do not have enough fire spaces to meet hundreds of people to cook with. The inside of largest building just has fire spaces to meet 10 families. This is very different from (觉得用"different from"不好，这个发现没法支撑阅读文章的论点，所以建议用“failed to support the point stated in the passage”之类) the passage says tha tstone houses are used for residential.
Furthermore, the building cannot be used for storage. The lecture said that there were even no containers in the building for maizestorage. The people cannot put the maize on the floor. On the contrary, the passage contends that the building is used for store food supplies, such as maize.
Finally, the lecture points out that some construction materials are found near the building, which proves that it may not be used for ceremonial. The materials, such as sand, stone and construction tools, provethat these buildings may use (be used) for construction (句式重复了，建议换一个). Also the pots can be interpreted as construction workers prepare for meals. However, the passage always thinks that the building is used for ceremonial （建议表达出lecture认为reading的此观点不成立 drastically counterargument against...etc）. 7 R% x( f/ o( c& j4 m8 L+ g" M( D
In a word, the viewpoints asserted in the lecture aretotally different from what the passage indicates.结尾比较简略