习作ISSUE28 球拍 求拍死

bzr2915UID: 2612029

28"Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little."
学生们只有在学习了事实的来龙去脉后才有必要记住这些事实。只学习事实本身的学生是学不到多少东西的

提纲：
1、
原观点过于极端两方面
1.1并非所有学习都必须掌握来龙去脉才能开始----这种学习在某些情况下是低效的、乏力的
1.1.1让步 诚然对某些知识的领悟通过全面的学习有助于理解和记忆—一些经典的几何定理的演绎推导
1.1.2
转折 但是当摆脱较少FACTS组成的知识点时，全面的掌握每个FACT的来龙去脉是低效率的——大多数的工程问题，对基本定理只了解其结论 直接应用
1.1.3
这种学习在某些情况下是乏力的、甚至很难展开--儿童教育 往往只是简单地教给他们FACTs，如果要给他们展开就需要借用他们无法理解的FACTs来解释，只会使他们更加混乱—1+1=2 哲学问题 至今无法解释？
1.2只学习FACTs本身的学生可能学习不到多少东西—这种学习方式也是极端的
1.2.1
只学习facts缺乏对facts之间的联系性的了解，很难达到大师的高度—真正的大师大多是博学的 很多数学家同时是哲学家 亚里士多德等
2、重申对俩种极端情况观点的部分支持反对，并基于上述论证提出一种可能的中立的观点也许是必要的和有效的
WORDS: 521
TIME: 01:09:28
DATE: 2010-1-31 13:20:38


The speaker argues that students should learn the relating knowledge before memorized a fact , on the other hand the students will learn little.While I strongly agree with the last statement which relating to the point that students who have learned only facts learned little , however, I do not agree with the first statement which might be troubled in the following respects.

Although learning the relating knowledge before memorize a fact is helpful for our understanding and
memorization, nevertheless, it might be cause an low-effective study style or a hardly carry out study way in most cases. First, it is troubled in the effective problem. Consider, for example, an electronic worker who product a chip in the factory assert a certain part just following as the circuit-diagram which designed by some engineers.In this case there is no necessary for him to know the principle of the chip or the function of the certain part what needed him to do is just make up these parts together. On the contrast , the factory educate any workers to know all the relating knowledge about the chip that might be costly for the company both in time and money , which leading to an low-effective product process. Second, it might be hardly carry outin some particular cases,such as the children's education. Consider, for example , a simple mathmathics' problem which is about the result of one plus one. The result is simply two but it can't be proved up to now. However, most of teachers will teach the children result is two and never tell them why because if they explain this problem will make the children confuse and it is hard for them to understand the relating knowledge. In short, memorizing facts only after learned the relating knowledge might be an ineffective studied method and sometimes it is hardly to carry out .I disagree with the speaker who unnecessary to embrace any study in this study way.

I strongly agree with the statement that students who have learned only facts have learned little, which might be an ineffective study method for most of people. It might lead to a lack of knowing the correlation of some certain facts which limit us to reach a higher level to achieve the apex of study. Consider , for example, Aristotle（亚里士多德） , a distinguish mathematician, philosopher as well as an excellent scientist,found out the relationship of different academic field to bring out amazing miracle to the world. The same to some other academic masters such like Einstein , Descartes（笛卡尔）.

To sum up I agree with the speakers' statement that just learned the facts is not an effective study way, while I disagree with the statement that before learning a fact we must know about the relating knowledge. In the final analyse which depends on the above discussion, a study way that to the necessary facts we should know the ideas , trend , and concepts before we memorize it , however to some other professional issue there is no need for us to memorize the relating knowledge instead of learning the facts might be more effective and accessible.