- 最后登录
- 2011-12-27
- 在线时间
- 133 小时
- 寄托币
- 736
- 声望
- 44
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-27
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 22
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 630
- UID
- 2595535
 
- 声望
- 44
- 寄托币
- 736
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-27
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 22
|
发表于 2010-2-22 16:07:13
|显示全部楼层
好久没过来更新了,其实每天都有写的~~马上就要考试了~不知道现在提高了哪怕一点点没有···
题目:ISSUE190 - "As long as people in a society are hungry or out of work or lack the basic skills needed to survive, the use of public resources to support the arts is inappropriate-and, perhaps, even cruel-when one considers all the potential uses of such money."
字数:566 用时:0:45:00 日期:2010/2/22
It using public resources to support the arts inappropriate, or even cruel, when there is poverty and unemployment in the society? I concede that too much emphasize on arts would be inappropriate, but the arts is an indispensible part of society even when there is still poverty and unemployment.
The arts are a valuable asset of society and an indispensible part of people's life. We believe that everyone has the mental and spiritual need, as well as physical need. And according to Maslow's theory, even if one does not fulfill his/her physical need, he/she still has the mental needs. And the art form is an effable way to fulfill people's, especially the artist's, spiritual need. Many artists use the arts to express themselves, their emotions, their thought and their feeling about the world. Even if Bach could not make a living by his music and needed help from his friends, he stick to music because it was his mental food, his passion and his life, until he finally died of hunger. Also art is so important to ordinary people because arts give them spiritual consolation. After the 911 accident, many people went to the movie theater to see the movie Mama Mia, which brought them into laughter and tears, and in this way their broken heart finds some comfort. The arts, if so important, whether to the artists and to ordinary people, is an indispensible part to the society. Because it is so valuable, the public resources should give it support in order for it to continue.
In addition, if the public resources only supported the arts after the poverty and employment were eliminated, the arts perhaps would never receive any support from public resources. Poverty and employment are common in every society, and even the richest country in the world, the America, still has the problem of poverty and employment. Excepts for the Communist Society, which is still a utopian now, as long as human beings exist, the poverty and unemployment will company and not be eliminated. If arts could not be supported by public resources until these facets disappeared, perhaps it would never receive support and cannot develop well.
Admittedly, it cannot be denied the fact that too much emphasize on arts in inappropriate. The arts are just one part of society and there are many other indispensible parts of society, and the public resources to support those facets are also of significance. Such facets range from people's living condition and employment to the economic, science and military. But these parts and the arts are not incompatible, because the government can advocate money designedly and reasonably to all these facets. What's more, the thriving of arts can also benefits the other areas, thus help reduce poverty and unemployment. For example, the hip-hop music is a type that born from the African American people, who worked hard and had heavy burden. Hip-hop, as their own music form, not only released their burden by bringing them a happy mood and also rendered their great opportunity--many African American people earned fame and got out of poverty by the music and the hip-hop became the pride of people.
In conclusion, while too much public resources to support the arts is inappropriate, the proper support to arts is necessary because the arts are an indispensible part of society even when there is still poverty. We should also realize that the support to arts and other facets of society are harmonious since the prosperity of art can bring benefits to those aspects. |
|