请教一道Argument

wwwforestUID: 2731086

31.The following appeared in the editorial section of a newsmagazine.

"Some states are creating new laws that restrict the use of of handheld
cell phones by drivers of automobiles. Such legislation, however, is sheer
folly. Although some people with cell phones undoubtedly cause problems on
the road, including serious accidents, the majority do not. Besides,
problems are also caused by drivers who are distracted by any number of
other activities, from listening to the radio to disciplining children.
Since there is no need to pass legislation restricting these and other
such activities, it follows that there is no need to restrict people's
freedom to use a device that they find convenient-or helpful in
emergencies."

这道题该怎么写？想听听大家的意见~

wilber5945UID: 2709861

刚学ARGUMENT，请指教：
1.不能说多数使用手机的人没事就不考虑少数的事故，而且应该考虑使用手机而发生的事故在总事故率中的比率（瞎编一个很高的率）；
2.既然知道了分散注意力的行为会导致危险，就应该尽力通过立法避免，虽然禁止开车时管教孩子是不现实的，但是禁止开车时听radio是完全可以的，所以不能说没有必要通过立法来限制这种行为；
3.由以上的关于开车该不该用手机的讨论无法推论到所有的设备吧，比如说管制刀具、枪支或ANYTHING ELSE;
4.还有一条貌似很牵强的，arguer的反驳是基于一个假设，禁止开车打handheld cell phones是为了降低事故率，但是可能是为了别的什么目的呢？

霁月难逢UID: 2718354

CHECK THSES OUT :

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=522397&highlight=

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=217360&highlight=

https://bbs.gter.net/search.p ... =views&ascdesc=desc

wwwforestUID: 2731086

多谢以上两位同学~！！！