求解惑

猫斯基UID: 2607814

前几天刚从新东方回来，作文老师是修锐。他的I的方法是将题目归为因果型，问解型，结论型，比较型四种，然后进行论证。在此，我的疑问主要在于因果型，课上，老师说过，对于因果型的题目，攻击果是没有意义的，要从因下手去支持抑或反对云云。这样是否正确呢？就以I 207为例，Rituals and ceremonies help define a culture. Without them, societies or groups of people have a diminished sense of who they are.老师的分析师后半句为因，因此按照他的理论，攻击前半句是没有意义的，比如我如果说，关于文化的定义仅有R 和C是不够的，这样应该是错误的，但是为什么不把前半句看作一句观点来进行论证呢？
  其二，都说I 考逻辑，呢么它的逻辑到底是在看到题目后，就像修锐那样，把题目归类，然后按照不同类别论证方法进行论证，抑或是，单纯 看做一个论点，自己进行论述只要逻辑严密，论述清楚即可。呢么这种情况对于两句话的呢种题目应该怎么分配论述重心呢？，毕竟坛子里有前辈讲到关键词这个说法。就是根据关键词展开。
  谢过

MercurySonUID: 2765276

我也是修锐老师的学生和LZ有同感啊,不过我想思路不一定那么死板吧.多看看范文应该会有帮助~~

霁月难逢UID: 2718354

老不正经的越讲越歪曲了

根本就没有分类这一说 ETS从来没有对自己的题目给出过任何分类 市面上的都是自己瞎分的而已

ISSUE都讲出“攻击”来了 再讲几个班的话就可以当做ETS的反面教材来了

AWITRO里说的明明白白：

The "Present Your Perspective on an Issue" task assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing. Each topic, presented in quotation marks, makes a claim about an issue that test takers can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions. Your task is to present a compelling case for your own position on the issue. Be sure to read the claim carefully and think about it from several points of view, considering the complexity of ideas associated with those perspectives. Then, make notes about the position you want to develop and list the main reasons and examples that you could use to support that position.

ringtailbunnyUID: 2579853

支持。我觉得XDF的issue部分就是个巨大的失败，修锐的argument部分对入门还是很有帮助的。
不要迷信XDF。要迷信，我们也只迷信ets。范文和intro