Using no limit as a limit—speedzshaw作文

speedzshawUID: 2556376

Young people should try different jobs before they decide which job or career they will do in the long term.

Working after graduation has become a trend among university students, who would invariably change jobs to fit their needs. But many experienced workers would advocate young people to affirm to their first jobs. Debates rage concerning whether or not young people should hold on to single job or career all their life. For my part, I agree that young people should try different kinds of jobs to determine what they would do in the long run.

To start with, trying different jobs would add to young people's job opportunity. There might be an implicit consensus among graduates, namely what they had acquired in universities has little link to their real jobs. It’s of high probability that they still have to learn more in their jobs to fit the position. For a young man, graduates from universities in particular, they seldom know exactly where their interests lie thus accumulating experiences could assume priority in most people's lists. Indeed, through different jobs in different companies, the young have more access to distinctive knowledge and usually essences of different companies. Mastering them would provide them more chances of getting promotion on one hand, but still serve as supplement to their knowledge structure on the other. One step further, all these together would put them in a favorable position in the job market yet coming. Besides, young people are not the only to look for a job. Still many others who are out of jobs due to different reasons also join the young in finding another job, who are less competitive for the lack of experiences favored by many companies sometimes. Besides, through thick and thin after so many attempts of different jobs, the young are capable of gradually getting acquainted with their advantages and disadvantages. They are able know more clearly what kind of jobs they need and fit thus making every effort to strike a balance among major, characteristics and interests. In that case, it's much more likely for them to get what they want and immerse in effort to do the best.

What's more, it would be an excellent opportunity to communicate with more people, who might be a help in the future. Our society is like a kind of net, covering all kinds of different jobs. No man can sever the bonds that unite him to his society simply by averting his eyes. He must ever be receptive and sensitive to the new; and have sufficient courage and skill to novel facts and have to deal with them. The young are new to the job markets. Anyone they meet, irrespective of whether it is a big boss from another company or just workmates in the same company is wealth that society bestows them. A kind of confidence is more likely to establish between acquaints during trade. Furthermore, in communication with different kinds of person, learning to recognize people and developing interpersonal skills will help them deal with identical relationships between workmates more smoothly in the future, which would also ease many unnecessary barriers in work life. In that sense, try different jobs, know more people and prosper the career.

To sum up, for more experiences that the young are busily engaged in seeking and more opportunities to have contact with various people, the young should consider try different kinds of jobs before determining what they will do in the future.

summeralwaysUID: 2704210

# F! v( y# c, cWorking after graduation has become a trend among university students, who would invariably change jobs to fit their needs. But many experienced workers would advocate young people to affirm 断言，证实的意思，不对吧？to their first jobs. Debates rage concerning
没看懂。。whether or not young people should hold on to single job or career all their life. For my part, I agree that young people should try different kinds of jobs to determine what they would do in the long run.
* B' k' J( G9 C, `  Y
7 c: W8 }; O' g+ \4 f
To start with, trying different jobs would add to young people's job opportunity. There might be an implicit consensus among graduates, namely what they had acquired in universities has little link to their real jobs. It’s of high probability that they still have to learn more in their jobs to fit the position. For a young man, graduates from universities in particular, they seldom know exactly where their interests lie thus accumulating experiences could assume priority in most people's lists. Indeed, through different jobs in different companies, the young have more access to distinctive knowledge and usually normal会不会好点？ essences of different companies. Mastering them would provide them more chances of getting promotion on one hand, but 有转折的意思在这里吗？still serve as supplement to their knowledge structure on the other. One step further, all these together would put them in a favorable position in the job market yet coming. Besides, young people are not the only to look for a job. Still many others who are out of jobs due to different reasons also join the young
join 可以这么用吗，不是很确定。。 in finding another job, who are less competitive for the lack of experiences favored by many companies sometimes.个人感觉这里有点多余 Besides, through thick and thin after so many attempts of different jobs, the young are capable of gradually getting acquainted with their advantages and disadvantages. They are able （to） know more clearly what kind of jobs they need and fit thus making every effort to strike a balance among major, characteristics and interests. In that case, it's much more likely for them to get what they want and immerse in effort to do the best.9 K8 v) T  ]' B" i/ Q
2 ?1 H" p7 ]2 B2 L
What's more, it would be an excellent opportunity to communicate with more people, who might be a help in the future. Our society is like a kind of net, covering all kinds of different jobs. No man can sever the bonds that unite him to his society simply by averting his eyes. He must ever be receptive and sensitive to the new; and have sufficient courage and skill to novel facts and have to deal with them. The young are new to the job markets.
Anyone they meet, irrespective of whether it is 后面说的是人，为什么用it is ..a big boss from another company or just workmates in the same company is wealth that society bestows them.
绿色的是这句话的主谓宾吧，这样看这句话写的不大对哦。A kind of confidence is more likely to establish被动 between acquaints 这里指相识的人吗？没这个词。during trade. Furthermore, in communication with different kinds of person,用in是什么意思？在这个交流的过程中吗？ learning to recognize people and developing interpersonal skills will help them deal with identical 不是很恰当，和不同的人发展关系应该是不同的吧？relationships between workmates more smoothly in the future, which would also ease many unnecessary barriers in work life. In that sense, trying different jobs, know more people and prosper the career. # Z* q, L! k! D4 z, ^0 {w
这句话什么意思？无任何主语，我没见过这样的句子。。
. j1 U" r8 F4 w, {
To sum up, for more experiences that the young are busily engaged in seeking and more opportunities to have contact with various people感觉很怪, the young should consider try different kinds of jobs before determining what they will do in the future.

词汇用的蛮好，很多新鲜的词，不过我总觉得分论点的论述不是特别清晰，虽然句式什么的都有变化，但读起来有点绕，不知道是不是我水平有限。。欢迎多多交流，加油

mpromanusUID: 2565872

36# speedzshaw

Telephones or televisions? (This is a frequent error made by non-native users: a single countable noun cannot stand as the subject of a sentence. It needs an article, or a plural form. E.g. you can say 'a cat is a small animal' or 'the cat is a small animal' or 'cats are small animals', but not 'cat is small animal'.) Belonging to the Same family of telecommunication but appearing at distinctive eras, both involve analysis of signals and provide great impulses towards human beings? (I'm still guessing..do you mean 'influence'?). People often argue over which one has had more positive effects on the human kind. For my part, I maintain that both are necessary for human kind while telephones assume more responsibilities? in a few respects.

To start with, the invention of television greatly revolutionizes the way of people spending their time. Long ago, in one of Jules Verne's novels (He wrote more than one novel, that's for sure, so if you can't quote the exact name of the novel, at least be accurate in meaning.), the first appearance of television was a photo-telephoto that was brought to fruition afterwards to satisfy the intention of “seeing” the person. It fits quite well for an old saying which goes: it's better to see for oneself rather than to hear about for many times. Technically adding sound to moving images (FYI: I personally think that television is about adding moving images to sounds, but this is not important XD), televisions, or television programs to be precisely, brings about alternatives (This means people had equivalent choices that are similar to televisions to start with..) to people's lives. They like to see favorite players on the pitch (This is the British English term for 'field', as in the playing area for soccer. Do remember to prefer American English vocabulary as much as possible - but if you don't feel like to, the bottom line is to be consistent i.e. if you use British English variations in spelling or words, use them throughout the essay and don't mix with the American English versions.) shooting, or singers on live performing live; they enjoy witnessing procedures public meetings all covered?; they favor sceneries of landscapes presented in front of them? (Much of this seems to be influenced by your native language.). It doesn’t matter to be an individual or as a group: with respect to for the former, without even leaving his home, television presents everything, while for respect with the latter, it creates an environment of exchanging ideas? (I don't get the part about how television 'creates an environment of exchanging ideas'.). What's more, demands for televisions also inspire producers of reality shows to make moves to encourage people to challenge and show their talents in public, just like in American Idol. This implicitly changes lifestyles of participants and audiences. Consequently, it must have been a really uneasy moment without televisions in people’s lives. (This paragraph is a tad too long if all you do was to consider the opposite view. Remember that the ultimate purpose of an essay to the explain to your reader what your point is and why, NOT what your point is NOT XD)

Yet, it might be more irritating to be without telephone in people's lives, especially in some certain respects. The? Developed telephone? (What kind of telephone is a 'developed telepone'?) marks the advancement in information technology, a much (a much 'what' difference? Do you mean to say 'much a difference' instead?) difference from Bell’s first phone. What's more important is that the telephone keeps on presenting? on all levels and information technology, collaborates to add a new phrase to people's lives: instant communication. People have a need to keep in touch instantaneously. Considering information transmission, advantages of the telephone far outweigh its tele-counterpart, for televisions engage audiences? no more than receiving information, while a phone call involves both sides for interaction. For example, when depressed in my life, my friends far away could relive me out of the plight and cheer me up again through a phone call. But with only television, I may lack that kind of communication to get me over, or to possibly exacerbate the already grave situation. It’s that telephones can serve as perfect vehicles to convey the nuisances intended by the speaker. (FYI: if you've ever attended a telephone conference with 8 people from different countries, each with a different accent of English, you'll appreciate the lack of useful niusances in telephone calls..XD) Once more, the telephone makes it possible for people to communicate at different places at the same time. Besides, under certain circumstances as emergencies like fire, if harnessed well, the great advantage of the telephone in saving time for salvage? is significant. One step further, along with the generation? of new technology, the mobile version of the telephone even eliminates the drawback for telephone ensconced?? and communicates wherever. In that sense, the telephone serves more useful purposes towards people's lives.

To sum up, it's true that both the telephone and the television exert positive effects on human kinds, yet in certain aspects concerning information interaction and emergencies, the television cannot compare with the other in significances.

总结：

请注意一下单数名词作泛指主语需要加冠词的使用。。具体用法参见冠词的用法。

表达方面还是有比较多不清晰的地方，而且似乎有直译的倾向。。你表意不清晰的主要问题还是对单词搭配所需要的语境的不了解，比如ensconce是说人固定、安顿的，而不是说事物的，salvage是说从废墟中抢救的，所以火还烧着时候的救火一般不会说salvage，这些。不是说不可以用，而是没有适合用这些单词的语境，那么把这些单词用上去的话就会让读者很莫名其妙。在中文里，你如果说‘昨天我的邻居家有人驾崩了’，别人一定会觉得奇怪怎么你邻居家难道是皇帝吗，这样，因为‘驾崩’这个词只能用在有关皇帝的语境里，道理是一样的。所以学习使用单词的时候请注意语境的搭配。

论述方面，请注意一般的写法应该是正面论点篇幅要比反面论点多，因为你写文的目的是说明自己的观点，而不是说明反方的观点。另外分段的要点是每段应该只有一个主要的论点，而不是所有的反面论述一段，所有的正面论述一段。普遍接受的议论文格式是 开篇-正面论点1-正面论点2-批驳反面论点-结束，中间三个段落的顺序可以交错。总体来说就是行文组织的方面要尽量标准一点。不是说一定要八股，如果你碰到一个特别的题目，或者你有特别的观点想表达，认为怎样的行文组织比较好的话，都是可以接受的，只是说这个格式对于比较全面地阐述一个问题来说是比较成熟也比较容易写。

lawrencelanUID: 2173940

# F! v( y# c, cWorking after graduation has become a trend among university students, who would invariably change jobs to fit their needs. But many experienced workers would advocate young people to a ...
summeralways 发表于 2010-3-25 10:48

Young people should try different jobs before they decide which job or career they will do in the long term.

Working after graduation has become a trend among university students, who would invariably change jobs to fit their needs. But many experienced workers would advocate young people to affirm (?)to their first jobs. Debates rage concerning whether or not young people should hold on to single job or career all their life. For my part, I agree that young people should try different kinds of jobs to determine what they would do in the long run."

To start with, trying different jobs would add to young people's job opportunity(opportunities). There might be an implicit consensus among graduates, namely what they had acquired in universities has little link to their real jobs. It’s of high probability that they still have to learn more in their jobs to fit the(their) position(s). For a young man(men), graduates from universities in particular, they seldom know exactly where their interests lie thus accumulating experiences could assume priority in most people's lists. Indeed, through different jobs in different companies, the young have more access to distinctive knowledge and usually essences of different companies. Mastering them would provide them (I think the later "them" would be better be replaced by "young men")more chances of getting promotion on one hand, but still serve as supplement to their knowledge structure on the other. One step further, all these together would put them in a favorable position in the job market yet coming. Besides, young people are not the only to look for a job. Still many others who are out of jobs due to different reasons also join the young in finding another job, who are less competitive for the lack of experiences favored by many companies sometimes. Besides, (Besides again?)through thick and thin after so many attempts of different jobs, the young are capable of gradually getting acquainted with their advantages and disadvantages. They are able (to) know more clearly what kind of jobs they need and fit thus making every effort to strike a balance among major, characteristics and interests. In that case, it's much more likely for them to get what they want and immerse in effort to do the best.

What's more, it would be an excellent opportunity to communicate with more people, who might be a help in the future. Our society is like a kind of net, covering all kinds of different jobs. No man can sever the bonds that unite him to his society simply by averting his eyes. He must ever be receptive and sensitive to the new; and have sufficient courage and skill to novel facts and have to deal with them. The young are new to the job markets. Anyone they meet, irrespective of whether it is a big boss from another company or just workmates in the same company is wealth that society bestows them. A kind of confidence is more likely to establish between acquaints during trade. Furthermore, in communication with different kinds of person, learning to recognize people and developing interpersonal skills will help them deal with identical relationships between workmates more smoothly in the future, which would also ease many unnecessary barriers in work life. In that sense, try different jobs, know more people and prosper the career.

To sum up, for more experiences that the young are busily engaged in seeking and more opportunities to have contact with various people, the young should consider try different kinds of jobs before determining what they will do in the future

总结：用词丰富，全文结构清晰。如果段落之内的条理更清楚一点，就更好了。

speedzshawUID: 2556376

To be well-informed, people should get information from many different information sources.

There's an implicit equation in many people's minds: being well-informed equals a success. They can come up with a long list bearing such names as Da Vinci. They desire so much to become a same success, but barely have any idea of how to procure it. For my part, I believe that being approachable to various kinds of information sources brings about the result people are busily engaged in seeking.

To lead off, different sources provide the information needed for people to establish adequate knowledge database for their own use. With this reserve to refer to, they are capable of deal with problems encountered at any time and at any place. Merely fixing eyes on one field not only restricts people's ways of thinking, but also constricts their ideas and thoughts as a whole. Most of the time, people get professional skills from classes, wisdom from books of ancestors, global information via medium like internet and newspaper. It's through such pattern of absorbing and accumulating information that's proved to be useful that the great build up their valuable databases. It's hard to imagine when Chairman Mao Zedong, shutting out from knowledge in history, geography, politics, military, etc, could correctly analyze the situation and guide China to a resurrection. In that case, the role of different sources is hard to neglect.

Moreover, people can recognize certain event relatively more clearly with different sources of information. Every now and then, people are overwhelmed by information ejecting in all directions. Limitations in single perception are always responsible for the fact that the remembered event contains only a fraction of the detail present during the factual one. Different sources provide people more choices to judge the same event. And that's why the juries are needed in a trial course. Of course, there’s one limitation of various information sources: people are relatively more vulnerable of being mislead. In terms of this, in my opinion, people have to behave quickly and naturally. Concerning the same social event, one newspaper’s conclusions are based on facts directly; others are found inferentially. If people are responsive steadily enough, one single saying would not possibly cram their minds. They can still decide precisely. After all, when one door closes, another opens.

Furthermore, being exposed different information sources brings in up-to-date information for people to renew their databases as mentioned above. The world is changing, and so is science and technology. Without adequate database, we can hardly survive through the abominable conditions, depending solely on single source of information; yet without renewing, we can as well not be possible to get through due to the impediment and depletion of knowledge. Take my major electrical engineering for example. Traditionally, I used to take conventional electric machines and normal grid being what I need to learn for granted. But I myself learn about more advanced technologies of my major like the intellgrid from more than classroom, but the internet and lectures. Invariably renewing and updating personal databases assume paramount position in catching up with the advancing world. And in that sense, people become know-all in life.

To sum up, being exposed to different information sources provide people the chance to establish and update their individual databases of knowledge, the opportunity to see what's happening around more precisely, with only thing is that they should respond quickly and wisely.

馋MEUID: 2761685

50# speedzshaw

speedzshawUID: 2556376

Newspapers and magazines are the best way of learning about a foreign country.

Globalization is becoming a trend that outrages around the world these days. People always feel an urge to learn about other countries. Thus one question is posed: how to learn about a foreign country best. For my part, I agree that it would be the best way of learning about a foreign country via newspaper and magazines taking account of different factors.

To lead off, in generally, newspaper and magazines cover basic information needed for people to know what's happened in the country. Nowadays, newspaper and magazines has become an effective way for news, issues, and also a way of entertainment. From government’s policies to social life, from culture to education, they are so pervasive that even the people living in that country prefer to reading newspaper and magazines for information. They exist to meet the needs. So to a certain extent, it could reveal much information and current conditions concerning the intended country. Some people might say that things they get from the internet is much more than those from the newspaper or magazines. But to be essentially, aren't those news a kind of internet-based newspaper or magazines? In that sense, newspaper and magazines should be a choice for people to get to know of a certain country.

In the second place, information of the wanted country on the newspaper and magazines is relatively complete. Concerning the same social event, one newspaper's conclusions are based on facts directly; others may be found inferentially. The emphasis also differs in magazines and newspapers. Magazines are much more concerned about deeply research of the information, while newspaper is a briefly touch on most occasions. Besides, the contents in the newspaper and magazines also vary. With topics spanning from economy to science, they collaborate to systematically provide people more opportunities to know that country from distinctive aspects. It would be absolutely sufficient for most people to get know a foreign country with rationale that they are just dabbling in the information of that country to seek novelty. A different lifestyle fascinates them. Thus, people could know what they want from newspaper and magazines.

Furthermore, it's more practical to learn about a foreign country through newspaper and magazines. To be accurate, I myself are most in favor of the view that with no other limitations, living in a foreign country is found to be the best way to learn about that country. To experience an entire different culture and to enjoy the beautiful landscape, all these would be more fundamentally add to my understanding of the country. And I still confess that some newspaper and magazines are much hindered, hampered by cultural disparities and poor translations. But I don't have that much time, money and language to go there every so often even it's an English-speaking country, and neither do most people. It would be more convenient and practical for us to gain that information from of newspaper and magazines for all their benefits listed above. Then, newspaper and magazines are the best way of learning about a foreign country.

To sum up, although it would be more preferable to learn about a foreign country once having lived there, concerning its disadvantages, I still suggest it's best to learn about a foreign country from magazines and newspaper.

crazyluUID: 2628382

不好意思，昨天学校停电了， 一直没改你的文章
我的在 https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1075143&extra=&page=2 12楼
加油

speedzshawUID: 2556376

Students at university or in college should choose the most difficult classes even if they cannot get top grades (marks) in them.

With so many courses presented for them, many students may be up in the air: should I choose a difficult class to improve my academic skills or a relatively easy one to secure the grade? For my part, I agree that students should be encouraged to choose some difficult classes, but not the most difficult ones for everyone.

To lead off, study is not all about the grades on the paper. Such students might enjoy a high probability to reap a good score in easy courses, which altogether would put them in a favorable position in competing for a scholarship. But in case of that, most of the time, these students are thus shut out from certain essential knowledge. And their own academic skills would possibly not be improved. Students shouldn't only have eyes for scores. Practical skills are much more important. In relatively hard courses, with students concentrating on what the teachers are teaching in class and lucubrating after class, it's unlikely for them to get a good score. Take my course Computer Software for example. The exacting teacher made so many rigor requirements in his courses and experiments that I had to arduously put myself in learning it, through which I learned a lot. Thus, choosing courses shouldn't be oriented on what scores to get.

Furthermore, even if the course might be a little bit difficult, it doesn't mean that we have no access to a good score. It actually depends on individual's attitude. If the students really immerse themselves in efforts to learn it, it's hard for them to get a bad score on that course. For instance, I had a course named Electrical Machine, which is derogated as the one of the 4 Abstruse Writings in my major electrical engineering. But every time in class, I would listen to what the teacher said carefully and think actively; while after class, I completed the homework assigned all by myself. In the final exam, I nearly got a full score, which was unheard of before. That might is another case of the saying: attitude is everything. What's more, nowadays, many students might encounter certain obstacles in learning the courses, yet easily to get a get a good score. In that case, the students are bound to acquire both the knowledge and the score. Hence, the students need not to fear to choose difficult classes.

Of course, I have to admit that it’s unwise and even impossible for everyone to choose the most difficult classes. At first, in terms of choosing course, it may be largely confined by objective factors, like that there isn't big enough classroom allowing all the students to take. Besides, with students’ basics, interests and time varying, it might result in disparities in understanding of the course. If everyone is coerced to choose that most difficult course even when they couldn’t understand the course, they would be more likely to develop a dislike towards that course, or even study. This results in the deformity in study. And students have to  waste a lot of time and energy sitting in the classroom mindlessly but acquire nothing.  In that sense, the students should choose courses according to their conditions in order to regulate everything for the best.

To sum up, I strongly recommend students to choose difficult courses, with only one concern is that their courses should respond to their abilities.

john_332UID: 2741978

4-5   作文修改  by 舜

Students at university or in college should choose the most difficult classes even if they cannot get top grades (marks) in them.

With so many courses presented for them, many students may be up in the air: should I choose a difficult class to improve my academic skills or a relatively easy one to secure the grade? For my part, I agree that students should be encouraged to choose some difficult classes, but not the most difficult ones for everyone.   

我觉得最后一句放在后面的段落中补充说明更好，因为这样会产生一种ambiguity，让读者不太明确你到底站在哪边。我也觉得的每个问题都应该辩证的看，用两分法来写，但是后来看一些评论说还是坚持一边比较清晰，也比较符合托福的要求。

To lead off, study is not all about the grades on the paper. Such students might enjoy a high probability to reap a good score in easy courses, which altogether would put them in a favorable position in competing for a scholarship. But in case of that, most of the time, these students are thus shut out from certain essential knowledge. And their own academic skills would possibly not be improved. Students shouldn't only have eyes for scores. Practical skills are much more important. In relatively hard courses, with students concentrating on what the teachers are teaching in class and lucubrating after class, it's unlikely for them to get a good score. Take my course Computer Software for example. The exacting teacher made so many rigor requirements in his courses and experiments that I had to arduously put myself in learning it, through which I learned a lot. Thus, choosing courses shouldn't be oriented on what scores to get.

  很多词汇用得非常好，是文章的亮点，佩服中... 很值得学习！

Furthermore, even if the course might be a little bit difficult, it doesn't mean that we have no access to a good score. It actually depends on individual's attitude. If the students really immerse themselves in efforts to learn it, it's hard for them to get a bad score on that course. For instance, I had a course named Electrical Machine, which is derogated as the one of the 4 Abstruse Writings in my major electrical engineering. But every time in class, I would listen to what the teacher said carefully and think actively; while after class, I completed the homework assigned all by myself. In the final exam, I nearly got a full score, which was unheard of before. That might is another case of the saying: attitude is everything. What's more, nowadays, many students might encounter certain obstacles in learning the courses, yet easily to get a get a good score. In that case, the students are bound to acquire both the knowledge and the score. Hence, the students need not to fear to choose difficult classes.

写得不错，例子也很丰富，只有学习的份，以我的水平是挑不出什么问题了，呵呵。

Of course, I have to admit that it’s unwise and even impossible for everyone to choose the most difficult classes. At first, in terms of choosing course, it may be largely confined by objective factors, like that there isn't big enough classroom allowing all the students to take. Besides, with students’ basics, interests and time varying, it might result in disparities in understanding of the course. If everyone is coerced to choose that most difficult course even when they couldn’t understand the course, they would be more likely to develop a dislike towards that course, or even study. This results in the deformity in study. And students have to  waste a lot of time and energy sitting in the classroom mindlessly but acquire nothing.  In that sense, the students should choose courses according to their conditions in order to regulate everything for the best.

  这一段就像我开头所说，个人觉得没必要，因为我们没办法，也不需要很全面的论证每一个topic，穷尽每一种情况来体现考虑的周全，思维的缜密，上面两段已经足够向评分老师证明你的实力了，短小而精悍。

To sum up, I strongly recommend students to choose difficult courses, with only one concern is that their courses should respond to their abilities.

wyacUID: 2633619

speedzshawUID: 2556376

The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.

Less laborious work and more frequent vacation enable people to travel in their spare time. But the debate arouses: which is the best way to travel. For my part, I disagree with that assertion that traveling in a group led by a tour guide is the best.

To lead off, I have to admit that a travel led by a tour guide indeed can make the trip at ease. Most people who travel are not familiar with the places they are going to, but they all express a strong desire to get to know of things concerned about these places more conveniently and completely. A tour guide can arrange all the agenda properly to meet people's needs. Besides, as in a large group, fee charged would be relatively cheaper than those who travel alone. Tour guide's explanation towards certain scenery is another reason people prefer traveling in a group. Compared with that, what they obtain from the internet is less oriented and completeness. Thus, taking into consideration of what's listed above, it's not a bad choice to travel in a group.

Nevertheless, some drawbacks inherent a trip led by a tour guide. At first, all the agenda have been settled before, invulnerable for minor changes. Other things, including the path chosen, time given for certain scenery, are largely circumscribed. Then tourists are often compelled not to stop by who are always on the move in their routinely work and study. Furthermore, people with different characters from different places consist of such a divergent group. It's hard to reach a fully informed consensus among them. Yet the tour guide has to concern about the interests of the majority at the expense of the minor ones, which leaves their needs unsatisfied. And maybe you are in that small proportion. Take my trip to the Great Canyon in Western Zhejiang for example. There were two ways out of the canyon, one of which is water drifting, another hiking on the defile. With only my classmate, a couple and I choosing the defile, the tour guide left us all by ourselves. And it turned out that if it were not for our choice, we might be impossible to enjoy those many scenery spots along the defile. Thus travelling in a group might not ease people's trip in some cases.

It seems to me sometimes a lot better to choose some other means to travel. If people had friends who are familiar with the places they intended for, they could ask their friends to act as temp guide, which surely guaranteed them more time at sceneries they favored when compared with a gushing trip in a group. Another alternative I strongly recommend is to travel alone or even organize a trip by oneself. It proves to be an effective way to enhance understanding towards that place and various other abilities. I once organized a hike towards Shaoshan for my classmates, who were fed up with the settled arrangements in group trip. For the well-arranged agenda, we barely wasted time and everyone did have a good time. In that sense, some alternatives are more likely to meet many people needs.

To sum up, it's not always a best way to travel in a group due to certain drawbacks. People could enjoy themselves more when turning for other means to travel.

chailybaiUID: 2741896

这篇偷去当范文了。。。卡卡~~

speedzshawUID: 2556376

Universities should give every member of the team the same grade when the team finishes a project.

In university, students are largely encouraged to participate in quite a variety of projects, either as an individual or as a group. But for the latter one, a problem may arouse: should each member of the group be bestowed with equal grades? For my part, I agree that universities should give every member of the team the same grade.

To lead off, equal grades for each member is a kind of recognition towards their endeavor in accomplishing the projects. Most students are willing to do such projects, firstly because they can hone their skills and accumulate certain experiences. But some of them have an eye for the grades. Due to different factors, not everyone in the group could sacrifice the same amount of time and present the same amount of effort, but they are all striving for an ultimate goal. And a group of students has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Given equal grades, the students are inclined to feel that their efforts are finally paid off. Take my experience in a project for example. The contribution of my group mates and I varied, but we all worked for an ultimate goal. And when it turned out to be equal grades for each one of us, we all felt very pleased. Thus, students could be given the same grades when the projects finished.

Furthermore, equal grades are also an encouragement from the school towards teamwork. Currently, what the society demands from the talents is not just their outstanding abilities, but also a sense of cooperation. As listed above, everyone has his own limitations. Thus perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. The university then should better prepare its students to meet the demands of the society. No matter how much certain member in the group devoting him into the group, it’s the group’s final performance that decides. Then with equal grades from the universities guaranteed, it’s easily for them to foster a sense of cooperation. Though there might be a free rider or so, since the students themselves choose to work as group, it also provides a good opportunity for them to try their best to regulate every member in achieving the final goal more efficiently. And a prize of equal grades is just worthwhile for their regulation. Hence, an urge for cooperation also calls for the university to endow the same grades for every member in the group.

To sum up, for the recognition towards personal efforts and the encouragement towards teamwork, universities should too be encouraged to give the same grades to each member in the group.