【big fish】 习作1.3 issue005 by gaobao

gaobaoayu123UID: 2740997

完全不会写教育类的题型 怎么搞啊今天死挤才挤出这么一点短。。。
Issue5一个国家应该要求所有的学生在进入大学之前学the same national curriculum 而不是允许有不同地区的学校去决定课程的offer（教育）

  Education, primarily affect the youth, is a significant factor influence the country’s future. When it comes to the issue that should every student learn the same curriculum before college, there arouses a drastic debate. It is hard to agree with any absolute point, combine the same national curriculum and the local feature would be a wise choice.
  First of all, the obvious merit of unify the national curriculum is to provide the students learn the same thing before attend college. As a consequence that the students in colleges are comes from countrywide, if they learn the different curriculum before it, arranging the college courses will become a tough work. My own experiences is a example, in order to complete the courses, the math professors had to leave the few students, who come from the region did not have the prepare curriculums about advanced mathematics. Unifying the national curriculum make a good performance on deduce the students’ learning differences before attending the college.
  In addition, the same national curriculum is good for the college to recruit students. If students learn the different curriculum, it is hard to have a fair standard in college recruit. China, for instance, one of the best countries for education, has a great problem in the unbalance education between provinces. Taking the different curriculum, every province makes the test paper to college receipt themselves. As a result, there is hardly a fair recruit, and many good students can not attend a fine college. So, unify the national curriculum can make a contribution to the fair education.
  Although there is plenty merits of unify the national curriculum, on the contrary, it is far from flexible education system. To narrow the differences between regions is necessary; indeed, the different outside condition can not be eliminated. Some regions may not have the ability to open some curriculums, such as swimming, physics or chemistry experiment, or the psychology, philosophy. Not only had the condition limited the curriculums, the local characteristics is also important. Like local literature, local music curriculums. The same national curriculum has the limits and has some flaw in local culture’s development.
  Further more, some special schools are not suit for the unified national curriculum, art school, technique school or agriculture school, for instance. There is no necessity for them to learn the same national curriculum, but they need the specialty curriculums to intensify their skills. Dancing, art history, agriculture technology is redundant for normal students, so conform with the national curriculum is not an appropriate manner for their education.

All in all, due to the above mentioned words, education is very important to a country’s future, much emphasizes would be taken on it. In order to have a fair environment in the pre-college education, combine the local feature with part-unified national curriculum is a good way.
另附argu51 提纲
Argument 固定题目：

51The following appeared in a medical newsletter.

"Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment."
1.没有证据证明两组患者的初始条件相同—扭伤程度相同，身体条件相同
2.两组对比试验并未控制变量：用了不同的医生，也许时间差正是由于医生的水平造成，跟药物无关。
3.即使是跟药物有关也没有证据证明所有的患者都经历了继发性感染，也许抗生素在其他方面发挥了左右
3.即使是与抗生素有关，建议所有被诊断为肌肉损伤的患者并不一定会有二次感染，普通的或轻度的肌肉损伤只需要一定的恢复治疗即可不需要服用抗生素。药不能随便吃，也许会造成不良后果。