寄托天下
查看: 908|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 【Big Fish】习作-2.28 Argument53-By Narashy [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
5
寄托币
322
注册时间
2009-2-15
精华
0
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-1 16:24:57 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
In this argument, the speaker asserts that the increased levels of melatonin before birth would cause shyness during infancy which continues to appear into later life. To reinforce his/her theory, the speaker cites the study taken on 25 infants. Althouth appealing, the whole conclusion rests on a series of unsubstantiated assumption which render it unconvincing as it stands.

First of all, the author fails to build the causal relation between melatonin and mild distress by the study on infants. How many infants were conceived in early autumn? Are these 25 infants comes from the same place or selected in a large area? Are they representitive? The study should be statistically reliable, however, we see no sign of this sampling in the argument. Unless it can be shown that the results on these 25 infants are representitive, the conclusion is highly suspectable.

Secondly, even if the assumption that it is melatonin that leads to the distress holds, which is completely unwarranted, it does not necessarily follow that ths distress in childhood would cause shyness when they grow up. As we all know, the character is determined by both gene and environment, of while the latter should be emphasised more. It is entirely possible that these 25 children come from the same place where most people are very shy and seldom talk to each other. Under this circumanstance, children would develop a shy character more easily than others no matter if they were affected by the melatonin.

In addition, there are other alternatives that the author should have taken into account. Such alternatives may include: Is there other material possesing the same functionality as melatonin which has been neglected by the author? The identifications made by the children themselves are probably not acurate. Further analysis and investigation should be conducted before making any conclusion.

To sum up, the speaker's conclusion is not well-supported. In order to convince me this conclusion, the author should provide concrete information about how the study is conducted. Such as how the sampling is done. To better evaluate the recommendation, a causality between distress in childhood and shyness should be established.
0 0

使用道具 举报

RE: 【Big Fish】习作-2.28 Argument53-By Narashy [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
【Big Fish】习作-2.28 Argument53-By Narashy
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1065535-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部